Re: [PATCH 01/12] sunrpc/cache: rename queue_loose to cache_dequeue

["J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>]

On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:22:38PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> 'loose' was a mis-spelling of 'lose', and even that wasn't a good
> word choice.
> So give this function a more useful name.

OK, others may take me longer to get to, but this is easy enough to
apply now!  Done.--b.

> 
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> ---
> 
>  net/sunrpc/cache.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> index ff0c230..d19c075 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_lookup(struct cache_detail *detail,
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sunrpc_cache_lookup);
>  
>  
> -static void queue_loose(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch);
> +static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch);
>  
>  static int cache_fresh_locked(struct cache_head *head, time_t expiry)
>  {
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static void cache_fresh_unlocked(struct cache_head *head,
>  		cache_revisit_request(head);
>  	if (test_and_clear_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &head->flags)) {
>  		cache_revisit_request(head);
> -		queue_loose(detail, head);
> +		cache_dequeue(detail, head);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static int cache_clean(void)
>  				)
>  				continue;
>  			if (test_and_clear_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &ch->flags))
> -				queue_loose(current_detail, ch);
> +				cache_dequeue(current_detail, ch);
>  
>  			if (atomic_read(&ch->ref.refcount) == 1)
>  				break;
> @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static const struct file_operations cache_file_operations = {
>  };
>  
>  
> -static void queue_loose(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch)
> +static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch)
>  {
>  	struct cache_queue *cq;
>  	spin_lock(&queue_lock);
> 
>