public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] sunrpc/cache: simplify cache_fresh_locked and cache_fresh_unlocked.
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:45:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090804154539.GL14249@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090804052238.15929.17142.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:22:38PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> The extra call to cache_revisit_request in cache_fresh_unlocked is not
> needed, as should have been fairly clear at the time of
>    commit 4013edea9a0b6cdcb1fdf5d4011e47e068fd6efb
> 
> If there are requests to be revisited, then we can be sure that
> CACHE_PENDING is set, so the second call is sufficient.

Yes: the only cache_make_upcall() caller (cache_check()) sets
CACHE_PENDING first.  And a grep for CACHE_PENDING verifies that
everyone that clears it immediately calls either cache_revisit_request()
or cache_dequeue().  OK!

Thanks, applied.--b.

> 
> So remove the first call.
> Then remove the 'new' parameter,
> then remove the return value for cache_fresh_locked which is only used
> to provide the value for 'new'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> ---
> 
>  net/sunrpc/cache.c |   23 ++++++++++-------------
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> index 44f4516..c1f897c 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> @@ -103,18 +103,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sunrpc_cache_lookup);
>  
>  static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch);
>  
> -static int cache_fresh_locked(struct cache_head *head, time_t expiry)
> +static void cache_fresh_locked(struct cache_head *head, time_t expiry)
>  {
>  	head->expiry_time = expiry;
>  	head->last_refresh = get_seconds();
> -	return !test_and_set_bit(CACHE_VALID, &head->flags);
> +	set_bit(CACHE_VALID, &head->flags);
>  }
>  
>  static void cache_fresh_unlocked(struct cache_head *head,
> -			struct cache_detail *detail, int new)
> +				 struct cache_detail *detail)
>  {
> -	if (new)
> -		cache_revisit_request(head);
>  	if (test_and_clear_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &head->flags)) {
>  		cache_revisit_request(head);
>  		cache_dequeue(detail, head);
> @@ -130,7 +128,6 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail,
>  	 */
>  	struct cache_head **head;
>  	struct cache_head *tmp;
> -	int is_new;
>  
>  	if (!test_bit(CACHE_VALID, &old->flags)) {
>  		write_lock(&detail->hash_lock);
> @@ -139,9 +136,9 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail,
>  				set_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &old->flags);
>  			else
>  				detail->update(old, new);
> -			is_new = cache_fresh_locked(old, new->expiry_time);
> +			cache_fresh_locked(old, new->expiry_time);
>  			write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock);
> -			cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail, is_new);
> +			cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail);
>  			return old;
>  		}
>  		write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock);
> @@ -165,11 +162,11 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail,
>  	*head = tmp;
>  	detail->entries++;
>  	cache_get(tmp);
> -	is_new = cache_fresh_locked(tmp, new->expiry_time);
> +	cache_fresh_locked(tmp, new->expiry_time);
>  	cache_fresh_locked(old, 0);
>  	write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock);
> -	cache_fresh_unlocked(tmp, detail, is_new);
> -	cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail, 0);
> +	cache_fresh_unlocked(tmp, detail);
> +	cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail);
>  	cache_put(old, detail);
>  	return tmp;
>  }
> @@ -224,8 +221,8 @@ int cache_check(struct cache_detail *detail,
>  				cache_revisit_request(h);
>  				if (rv == -EAGAIN) {
>  					set_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &h->flags);
> -					cache_fresh_unlocked(h, detail,
> -					     cache_fresh_locked(h, get_seconds()+CACHE_NEW_EXPIRY));
> +					cache_fresh_locked(h, get_seconds()+CACHE_NEW_EXPIRY);
> +					cache_fresh_unlocked(h, detail);
>  					rv = -ENOENT;
>  				}
>  				break;
> 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-08-04 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-04  5:22 [PATCH 00/12] Some improvements to request deferral and related code NeilBrown
     [not found] ` <20090804051145.15929.11356.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 03/12] sunrpc/cache: simplify cache_fresh_locked and cache_fresh_unlocked NeilBrown
     [not found]     ` <20090804052238.15929.17142.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 15:45       ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 01/12] sunrpc/cache: rename queue_loose to cache_dequeue NeilBrown
     [not found]     ` <20090804052238.15929.91015.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 14:05       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 02/12] sunrpc/cache: make sure deferred requests eventually get revisited NeilBrown
     [not found]     ` <20090804052238.15929.74402.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 15:02       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 04/12] sunrpc/cache: recheck cache validity after cache_defer_req NeilBrown
     [not found]     ` <20090804052238.15929.56800.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 20:42       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-06  4:57         ` Neil Brown
     [not found]           ` <19066.25248.283061.383233-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-25 21:50             ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-26  0:42               ` Neil Brown
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 07/12] sunrpc/cache: allow thread to block while waiting for cache update NeilBrown
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 08/12] sunrpc/cache: retry cache lookups that return -ETIMEDOUT NeilBrown
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 06/12] sunrpc/cache: avoid variable over-loading in cache_defer_req NeilBrown
     [not found]     ` <20090804052239.15929.87201.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 20:47       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-06  4:35         ` Neil Brown
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 09/12] nfsd/idmap: drop special request deferal in favour of improved default NeilBrown
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 10/12] sunrpc: fix memory leak in unix_gid cache NeilBrown
     [not found]     ` <20090804052239.15929.71459.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 20:55       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 11/12] sunrpc/cache: change deferred-request hash table to use hlist NeilBrown
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 05/12] sunrpc/cache: use list_del_init for the list_head entries in cache_deferred_req NeilBrown
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 12/12] sunrpc: close connection when a request is irretrievably lost NeilBrown
2009-08-04 14:04   ` [PATCH 00/12] Some improvements to request deferral and related code J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-07  4:13     ` Neil Brown
     [not found]       ` <19067.43518.105153.247173-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-10 15:05         ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090804154539.GL14249@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox