From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] sunrpc/cache: change deferred-request hash table to use hlist.
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:32:55 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090909063254.20462.93058.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090909062539.20462.67466.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
Being a hash table, hlist is the best option.
There is currently some ugliness were we treat "->next == NULL" as
a special case to avoid having to initialise the whole array.
This change nicely gets rid of that case.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h | 2 +-
net/sunrpc/cache.c | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h
index ef3db11..ba9d72c 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct cache_req {
* delayed awaiting cache-fill
*/
struct cache_deferred_req {
- struct list_head hash; /* on hash chain */
+ struct hlist_node hash; /* on hash chain */
struct list_head recent; /* on fifo */
struct cache_head *item; /* cache item we wait on */
void *owner; /* we might need to discard all defered requests
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
index 46e9e2b..dab417c 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cache_purge);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cache_defer_lock);
static LIST_HEAD(cache_defer_list);
-static struct list_head cache_defer_hash[DFR_HASHSIZE];
+static struct hlist_head cache_defer_hash[DFR_HASHSIZE];
static int cache_defer_cnt;
struct thread_deferred_req {
@@ -539,9 +539,7 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item)
list_add(&dreq->recent, &cache_defer_list);
- if (cache_defer_hash[hash].next == NULL)
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache_defer_hash[hash]);
- list_add(&dreq->hash, &cache_defer_hash[hash]);
+ hlist_add_head(&dreq->hash, &cache_defer_hash[hash]);
/* it is in, now maybe clean up */
discard = NULL;
@@ -549,7 +547,7 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item)
discard = list_entry(cache_defer_list.prev,
struct cache_deferred_req, recent);
list_del_init(&discard->recent);
- list_del_init(&discard->hash);
+ hlist_del_init(&discard->hash);
cache_defer_cnt--;
}
spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock);
@@ -568,12 +566,12 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item)
wait_event_interruptible_timeout(
sleeper.wait,
!test_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &item->flags)
- || list_empty(&sleeper.handle.hash),
+ || hlist_unhashed(&sleeper.handle.hash),
req->thread_wait);
spin_lock(&cache_defer_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&sleeper.handle.hash)) {
+ if (!hlist_unhashed(&sleeper.handle.hash)) {
list_del_init(&sleeper.handle.recent);
- list_del_init(&sleeper.handle.hash);
+ hlist_del_init(&sleeper.handle.hash);
cache_defer_cnt--;
}
spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock);
@@ -594,24 +592,20 @@ static void cache_revisit_request(struct cache_head *item)
struct cache_deferred_req *dreq;
struct list_head pending;
- struct list_head *lp;
+ struct hlist_node *lp, *tmp;
int hash = DFR_HASH(item);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pending);
spin_lock(&cache_defer_lock);
- lp = cache_defer_hash[hash].next;
- if (lp) {
- while (lp != &cache_defer_hash[hash]) {
- dreq = list_entry(lp, struct cache_deferred_req, hash);
- lp = lp->next;
+ hlist_for_each_entry_safe(dreq, lp, tmp,
+ &cache_defer_hash[hash], hash)
if (dreq->item == item) {
- list_del_init(&dreq->hash);
+ hlist_del_init(&dreq->hash);
list_move(&dreq->recent, &pending);
cache_defer_cnt--;
}
- }
- }
+
spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock);
while (!list_empty(&pending)) {
@@ -632,7 +626,7 @@ void cache_clean_deferred(void *owner)
list_for_each_entry_safe(dreq, tmp, &cache_defer_list, recent) {
if (dreq->owner == owner) {
- list_del_init(&dreq->hash);
+ hlist_del_init(&dreq->hash);
list_move(&dreq->recent, &pending);
cache_defer_cnt--;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-09 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-09 6:32 [PATCH 0/9] Some improvements to request deferral and related code NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20090909062539.20462.67466.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 5/9] sunrpc/cache: allow threads to block while waiting for cache update NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20090909063254.20462.99277.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-02 20:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-12-02 21:23 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-12-02 21:50 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 7/9] nfsd/idmap: drop special request deferal in favour of improved default NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20090909063254.20462.80299.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-02 22:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 6/9] sunrpc/cache: retry cache lookups that return -ETIMEDOUT NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20090909063254.20462.41616.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-02 22:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-12-03 16:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-12-04 4:38 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <20091204153845.1ec83de5-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-05 1:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-12-15 6:27 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <20091215172729.5e1d0190-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-01 17:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-02-02 21:33 ` Neil Brown
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 1/9] sunrpc/cache: change cache_defer_req to return -ve error, not boolean NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20090909063254.20462.57204.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-11 21:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 2/9] sunrpc/cache: simplify cache_fresh_locked and cache_fresh_unlocked NeilBrown
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 3/9] sunrpc/cache: use list_del_init for the list_head entries in cache_deferred_req NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20090909063254.20462.7969.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-18 15:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 4/9] sunrpc/cache: avoid variable over-loading in cache_defer_req NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20090909063254.20462.68582.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-18 21:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-09 6:32 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 9/9] sunrpc: close connection when a request is irretrievably lost NeilBrown
2009-09-11 21:07 ` [PATCH 0/9] Some improvements to request deferral and related code J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090909063254.20462.93058.stgit@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox