From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] sunrpc/cache: simplify cache_fresh_locked and cache_fresh_unlocked.
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:32:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090909063254.20462.36051.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090909062539.20462.67466.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
The extra call to cache_revisit_request in cache_fresh_unlocked is not
needed, as should have been fairly clear at the time of
commit 4013edea9a0b6cdcb1fdf5d4011e47e068fd6efb
If there are requests to be revisited, then we can be sure that
CACHE_PENDING is set, so the second call is sufficient.
So remove the first call.
Then remove the 'new' parameter,
then remove the return value for cache_fresh_locked which is only used
to provide the value for 'new'.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
net/sunrpc/cache.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
index aafb0e7..baddb23 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -105,18 +105,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sunrpc_cache_lookup);
static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch);
-static int cache_fresh_locked(struct cache_head *head, time_t expiry)
+static void cache_fresh_locked(struct cache_head *head, time_t expiry)
{
head->expiry_time = expiry;
head->last_refresh = get_seconds();
- return !test_and_set_bit(CACHE_VALID, &head->flags);
+ set_bit(CACHE_VALID, &head->flags);
}
static void cache_fresh_unlocked(struct cache_head *head,
- struct cache_detail *detail, int new)
+ struct cache_detail *detail)
{
- if (new)
- cache_revisit_request(head);
if (test_and_clear_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &head->flags)) {
cache_revisit_request(head);
cache_dequeue(detail, head);
@@ -132,7 +130,6 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail,
*/
struct cache_head **head;
struct cache_head *tmp;
- int is_new;
if (!test_bit(CACHE_VALID, &old->flags)) {
write_lock(&detail->hash_lock);
@@ -141,9 +138,9 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail,
set_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &old->flags);
else
detail->update(old, new);
- is_new = cache_fresh_locked(old, new->expiry_time);
+ cache_fresh_locked(old, new->expiry_time);
write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock);
- cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail, is_new);
+ cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail);
return old;
}
write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock);
@@ -167,11 +164,11 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail,
*head = tmp;
detail->entries++;
cache_get(tmp);
- is_new = cache_fresh_locked(tmp, new->expiry_time);
+ cache_fresh_locked(tmp, new->expiry_time);
cache_fresh_locked(old, 0);
write_unlock(&detail->hash_lock);
- cache_fresh_unlocked(tmp, detail, is_new);
- cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail, 0);
+ cache_fresh_unlocked(tmp, detail);
+ cache_fresh_unlocked(old, detail);
cache_put(old, detail);
return tmp;
}
@@ -240,8 +237,8 @@ int cache_check(struct cache_detail *detail,
cache_revisit_request(h);
if (rv == -EAGAIN) {
set_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &h->flags);
- cache_fresh_unlocked(h, detail,
- cache_fresh_locked(h, get_seconds()+CACHE_NEW_EXPIRY));
+ cache_fresh_locked(h, get_seconds()+CACHE_NEW_EXPIRY);
+ cache_fresh_unlocked(h, detail);
rv = -ENOENT;
}
break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-09 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-09 6:32 [PATCH 0/9] Some improvements to request deferral and related code NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20090909062539.20462.67466.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 5/9] sunrpc/cache: allow threads to block while waiting for cache update NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20090909063254.20462.99277.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-02 20:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-12-02 21:23 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-12-02 21:50 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 3/9] sunrpc/cache: use list_del_init for the list_head entries in cache_deferred_req NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20090909063254.20462.7969.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-18 15:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 4/9] sunrpc/cache: avoid variable over-loading in cache_defer_req NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20090909063254.20462.68582.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-18 21:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 7/9] nfsd/idmap: drop special request deferal in favour of improved default NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20090909063254.20462.80299.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-02 22:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-09 6:32 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 6/9] sunrpc/cache: retry cache lookups that return -ETIMEDOUT NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20090909063254.20462.41616.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-02 22:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-12-03 16:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-12-04 4:38 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <20091204153845.1ec83de5-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-05 1:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-12-15 6:27 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <20091215172729.5e1d0190-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-01 17:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-02-02 21:33 ` Neil Brown
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 1/9] sunrpc/cache: change cache_defer_req to return -ve error, not boolean NeilBrown
[not found] ` <20090909063254.20462.57204.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-11 21:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 8/9] sunrpc/cache: change deferred-request hash table to use hlist NeilBrown
2009-09-09 6:32 ` [PATCH 9/9] sunrpc: close connection when a request is irretrievably lost NeilBrown
2009-09-11 21:07 ` [PATCH 0/9] Some improvements to request deferral and related code J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090909063254.20462.36051.stgit@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox