* [PATCH 2] SUNRPC: Fix a slow server-side memory leak with RPC-over-TCP
@ 2024-04-03 14:36 Chuck Lever
2024-04-04 13:04 ` David Howells
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever @ 2024-04-03 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nfs
Cc: Jan Schunk, Alexander Duyck, Jakub Kacinski, David Howells,
Chuck Lever
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Jan Schunk reports that his small NFS servers suffer from memory
exhaustion after just a few days. A bisect shows that commit
e18e157bb5c8 ("SUNRPC: Send RPC message on TCP with a single
sock_sendmsg() call") is the first bad commit.
That commit assumed that sock_sendmsg() releases all the pages in
the underlying bio_vec array, but the reality is that it doesn't.
svc_xprt_release() releases the rqst's response pages, but the
record marker page fragment isn't one of those, so it is never
released.
This is a narrow fix that can be applied to stable kernels. A
more extensive fix is in the works.
Reported-by: Jan Schunk <scpcom@gmx.de>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218671
Fixes: e18e157bb5c8 ("SUNRPC: Send RPC message on TCP with a single sock_sendmsg() call")
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: Jakub Kacinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 10 +---------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
Changes since RFC:
- It's safe to release the fragment as soon as sock_sendmsg() returns
- Remove the now-stale documenting comment
- Deeper testing has been successful
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 545017a3daa4..6b3f01beb294 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -1206,15 +1206,6 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
* MSG_SPLICE_PAGES is used exclusively to reduce the number of
* copy operations in this path. Therefore the caller must ensure
* that the pages backing @xdr are unchanging.
- *
- * Note that the send is non-blocking. The caller has incremented
- * the reference count on each page backing the RPC message, and
- * the network layer will "put" these pages when transmission is
- * complete.
- *
- * This is safe for our RPC services because the memory backing
- * the head and tail components is never kmalloc'd. These always
- * come from pages in the svc_rqst::rq_pages array.
*/
static int svc_tcp_sendmsg(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
rpc_fraghdr marker, unsigned int *sentp)
@@ -1244,6 +1235,7 @@ static int svc_tcp_sendmsg(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, rqstp->rq_bvec,
1 + count, sizeof(marker) + rqstp->rq_res.len);
ret = sock_sendmsg(svsk->sk_sock, &msg);
+ page_frag_free(buf);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
*sentp += ret;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2] SUNRPC: Fix a slow server-side memory leak with RPC-over-TCP
2024-04-03 14:36 [PATCH 2] SUNRPC: Fix a slow server-side memory leak with RPC-over-TCP Chuck Lever
@ 2024-04-04 13:04 ` David Howells
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2024-04-04 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Lever
Cc: dhowells, linux-nfs, Jan Schunk, Alexander Duyck, Jakub Kacinski,
Chuck Lever
Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org> wrote:
> That commit assumed that sock_sendmsg() releases all the pages in
> the underlying bio_vec array, but the reality is that it doesn't.
> svc_xprt_release() releases the rqst's response pages, but the
> record marker page fragment isn't one of those, so it is never
> released.
More like the network layer will take its own refs and drop those when it is
done. As you say, it doesn't release the caller's refs.
Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-04 13:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-03 14:36 [PATCH 2] SUNRPC: Fix a slow server-side memory leak with RPC-over-TCP Chuck Lever
2024-04-04 13:04 ` David Howells
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox