From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: daggs <daggs@gmx.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unable to mount nfs4 mount
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 14:14:27 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871swflfxo.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <trinity-72ebcb17-21db-44da-abb3-5ee70ac0ec32-1483706005238@3capp-mailcom-bs05>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4765 bytes --]
On Fri, Jan 06 2017, daggs wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>> Subject: Re: unable to mount nfs4 mount
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 27 2016, daggs wrote:
>>
>> > Greetings Neil,
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Dec 26 2016, daggs wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Greetings,
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Mon, Dec 26 2016, daggs wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Can you strace mountd while you attempt a mount?
>> >> >> >> e.g.
>> >> >> >> strace -o /tmp/trace -s 1000 -p 241
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> and send the /tmp/trace.
>> >> >> >> Also, after the attempt fails, run
>> >> >> >> rpcdebug -m rpc -s cache
>> >> >> >> grep . /proc/net/rpc/*/c*
>> >> >> >> cat /proc/fs/nfsd/exports
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> and report the output.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > here:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > # cat /tmp/trace
>> >> >> > pselect6(1024, [3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12], NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) = 1 (in [3])
>> >> >> > read(3, "nfsd 10.0.0.1\n", 32768) = 14
>> >> >> > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/run/nfs/etab", O_RDONLY) = 14
>> >> >> > fstat(14, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=435, ...}) = 0
>> >> >> > close(14) = 0
>> >> >> > write(3, "nfsd 10.0.0.1 2079 10.0.0.0/24 \n", 32) = 32
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This is weird.
>> >> >> Here mountd is telling nfsd that when a request comes from IP address
>> >> >> 10.0.0.1, it should look for export entries associated with the client
>> >> >> name "10.0.0.0/24", which is good.
>> >> >> However the expiry time for that information is "2079", which is back in
>> >> >> January 1970.
>> >> >> When mountd writes that number, it computes it as
>> >> >> time(0) + DEFAULT_TTL
>> >> >> where DEFAULT_TTL is (30 * 60)
>> >> >> Which suggests time(0) is "279".
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What is the current time on this system?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If it really was very early on Jan 1st 1970, it should work, however...
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > pselect6(1024, [3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12], NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL <detached ...>
>> >> >> > # rpcdebug -m rpc -s cache
>> >> >> > rpc cache
>> >> >> > # grep . /proc/net/rpc/*/c*
>> >> >> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.gid/content:#uid cnt: gids...
>> >> >> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/channel:nfsd 10.0.0.1
>> >> >> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/channel:nfsd 10.0.0.1
>> >> >> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/content:#class IP domain
>> >> >> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/content:# expiry=2079 refcnt=1 flags=1
>> >> >> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/content:# nfsd 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.0/24
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ...the fact that this line is commented out indicates that the entry in
>> >> >> the cache is already expired. So the time must be after 2079.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Maybe the time is getting set from the network at an awkward time that
>> >> >> races with NFS service some how.
>> >> >> Can you find a way to run "exportfs -f" after the time has been set
>> >> >> correctly?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> NeilBrown
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > wait, I think I've seen this somewhere, does this feature needs rtc? this board doesn't have rtc component.
>> >> > for example, I cannot use openssh as ssh server because it needs rtc. I have to use dropbear.
>> >> > if so, this looks like it will affect nfsv3 mounts, am I right?
>> >>
>> >> No, you shouldn't need an RTC.
>> >> You need the synchronize the clock with ntp or similar, else time stamps
>> >> on files will look wrong.
>> >> Though I think we fixed issues with wall-clock-time jumping in 2.6.37...
>> >>
>> >> If you could try using "exportfs -f", and explain what does happen with
>> >> time - do you use ntp ?? - we might be able to make progress.
>> >
>> > I'll build ntp into the image and try. does this affects nfsv3 too?
>>
>> Having correct time is quite important for any version of NFS. With out
>> it, time stamps on files get confused. "make" doesn't cope at all,
>> "tar" often complains, other tools might experience other problems.
>>
>> I still cannot quite see why having an incorrect clock would cause the
>> particular symptoms you are experiencing, but it is worth fixing anyway.
> I worked around the issue by setting the date manually. the issue still presists.
>
>>
>> >
>> > what should I do with the "exportfs -f"? jsut run it and retry?
>>
>> Yes.
> exportfs -f didn't made any difference.
OK. Please:
- make sure the time is (nearly) correct - e.g. running date manually.
- run "exportfs -f"
- run "strace" on mountd
- try to mount the filesystem
- stop the strace
- run
rpcdebug -m rpc -s cache
grep . /proc/net/rpc/*/*
cat /proc/fs/nfsd/exports
(note that it isn't quite the same 'grep' as before).
then post the output of the 'strace', the 'grep', and the 'cat'.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-07 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-23 13:12 unable to mount nfs4 mount daggs
2016-12-24 3:29 ` NeilBrown
2016-12-24 7:11 ` daggs
2016-12-24 19:41 ` NeilBrown
2016-12-24 19:52 ` daggs
2016-12-25 1:20 ` NeilBrown
2016-12-25 20:09 ` daggs
2016-12-25 20:33 ` NeilBrown
2016-12-26 7:48 ` daggs
2016-12-26 11:19 ` NeilBrown
2016-12-26 18:54 ` daggs
2017-01-04 3:18 ` NeilBrown
2017-01-06 12:33 ` daggs
2017-01-07 3:14 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-02-03 13:31 ` daggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871swflfxo.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=daggs@gmx.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox