From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: daggs <daggs@gmx.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unable to mount nfs4 mount
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 07:33:53 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fulboij2.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <trinity-c0b9c914-6d36-40d8-a13a-38cde8b7d23f-1482696592233@3capp-mailcom-bs03>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2460 bytes --]
On Mon, Dec 26 2016, daggs wrote:
>> Can you strace mountd while you attempt a mount?
>> e.g.
>> strace -o /tmp/trace -s 1000 -p 241
>>
>> and send the /tmp/trace.
>> Also, after the attempt fails, run
>> rpcdebug -m rpc -s cache
>> grep . /proc/net/rpc/*/c*
>> cat /proc/fs/nfsd/exports
>>
>> and report the output.
>>
> here:
>
> # cat /tmp/trace
> pselect6(1024, [3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12], NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) = 1 (in [3])
> read(3, "nfsd 10.0.0.1\n", 32768) = 14
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/run/nfs/etab", O_RDONLY) = 14
> fstat(14, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=435, ...}) = 0
> close(14) = 0
> write(3, "nfsd 10.0.0.1 2079 10.0.0.0/24 \n", 32) = 32
This is weird.
Here mountd is telling nfsd that when a request comes from IP address
10.0.0.1, it should look for export entries associated with the client
name "10.0.0.0/24", which is good.
However the expiry time for that information is "2079", which is back in
January 1970.
When mountd writes that number, it computes it as
time(0) + DEFAULT_TTL
where DEFAULT_TTL is (30 * 60)
Which suggests time(0) is "279".
What is the current time on this system?
If it really was very early on Jan 1st 1970, it should work, however...
> pselect6(1024, [3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12], NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL <detached ...>
> # rpcdebug -m rpc -s cache
> rpc cache
> # grep . /proc/net/rpc/*/c*
> /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.gid/content:#uid cnt: gids...
> /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/channel:nfsd 10.0.0.1
> /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/channel:nfsd 10.0.0.1
> /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/content:#class IP domain
> /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/content:# expiry=2079 refcnt=1 flags=1
> /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/content:# nfsd 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.0/24
...the fact that this line is commented out indicates that the entry in
the cache is already expired. So the time must be after 2079.
Maybe the time is getting set from the network at an awkward time that
races with NFS service some how.
Can you find a way to run "exportfs -f" after the time has been set
correctly?
NeilBrown
> /proc/net/rpc/nfs4.idtoname/content:#domain type id [name]
> /proc/net/rpc/nfs4.nametoid/content:#domain type name [id]
> /proc/net/rpc/nfsd.export/content:#path domain(flags)
> /proc/net/rpc/nfsd.fh/content:#domain fsidtype fsid [path]
> # cat /proc/fs/nfsd/exports
> # Version 1.1
> # Path Client(Flags) # IPs
>
> Dagg.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-25 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-23 13:12 unable to mount nfs4 mount daggs
2016-12-24 3:29 ` NeilBrown
2016-12-24 7:11 ` daggs
2016-12-24 19:41 ` NeilBrown
2016-12-24 19:52 ` daggs
2016-12-25 1:20 ` NeilBrown
2016-12-25 20:09 ` daggs
2016-12-25 20:33 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2016-12-26 7:48 ` daggs
2016-12-26 11:19 ` NeilBrown
2016-12-26 18:54 ` daggs
2017-01-04 3:18 ` NeilBrown
2017-01-06 12:33 ` daggs
2017-01-07 3:14 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-03 13:31 ` daggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fulboij2.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=daggs@gmx.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox