From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: daggs <daggs@gmx.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unable to mount nfs4 mount
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 22:19:44 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d1gfndin.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <trinity-161ef8fa-88f7-4128-85e2-cc4f1abb31a7-1482738488938@3capp-mailcom-bs14>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3005 bytes --]
On Mon, Dec 26 2016, daggs wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>> On Mon, Dec 26 2016, daggs wrote:
>>
>> >> Can you strace mountd while you attempt a mount?
>> >> e.g.
>> >> strace -o /tmp/trace -s 1000 -p 241
>> >>
>> >> and send the /tmp/trace.
>> >> Also, after the attempt fails, run
>> >> rpcdebug -m rpc -s cache
>> >> grep . /proc/net/rpc/*/c*
>> >> cat /proc/fs/nfsd/exports
>> >>
>> >> and report the output.
>> >>
>> > here:
>> >
>> > # cat /tmp/trace
>> > pselect6(1024, [3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12], NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) = 1 (in [3])
>> > read(3, "nfsd 10.0.0.1\n", 32768) = 14
>> > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/run/nfs/etab", O_RDONLY) = 14
>> > fstat(14, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=435, ...}) = 0
>> > close(14) = 0
>> > write(3, "nfsd 10.0.0.1 2079 10.0.0.0/24 \n", 32) = 32
>>
>> This is weird.
>> Here mountd is telling nfsd that when a request comes from IP address
>> 10.0.0.1, it should look for export entries associated with the client
>> name "10.0.0.0/24", which is good.
>> However the expiry time for that information is "2079", which is back in
>> January 1970.
>> When mountd writes that number, it computes it as
>> time(0) + DEFAULT_TTL
>> where DEFAULT_TTL is (30 * 60)
>> Which suggests time(0) is "279".
>>
>> What is the current time on this system?
>>
>> If it really was very early on Jan 1st 1970, it should work, however...
>>
>>
>> > pselect6(1024, [3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12], NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL <detached ...>
>> > # rpcdebug -m rpc -s cache
>> > rpc cache
>> > # grep . /proc/net/rpc/*/c*
>> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.gid/content:#uid cnt: gids...
>> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/channel:nfsd 10.0.0.1
>> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/channel:nfsd 10.0.0.1
>> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/content:#class IP domain
>> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/content:# expiry=2079 refcnt=1 flags=1
>> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/content:# nfsd 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.0/24
>>
>> ...the fact that this line is commented out indicates that the entry in
>> the cache is already expired. So the time must be after 2079.
>>
>> Maybe the time is getting set from the network at an awkward time that
>> races with NFS service some how.
>> Can you find a way to run "exportfs -f" after the time has been set
>> correctly?
>>
>> NeilBrown
>>
>>
>
> wait, I think I've seen this somewhere, does this feature needs rtc? this board doesn't have rtc component.
> for example, I cannot use openssh as ssh server because it needs rtc. I have to use dropbear.
> if so, this looks like it will affect nfsv3 mounts, am I right?
No, you shouldn't need an RTC.
You need the synchronize the clock with ntp or similar, else time stamps
on files will look wrong.
Though I think we fixed issues with wall-clock-time jumping in 2.6.37...
If you could try using "exportfs -f", and explain what does happen with
time - do you use ntp ?? - we might be able to make progress.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-26 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-23 13:12 unable to mount nfs4 mount daggs
2016-12-24 3:29 ` NeilBrown
2016-12-24 7:11 ` daggs
2016-12-24 19:41 ` NeilBrown
2016-12-24 19:52 ` daggs
2016-12-25 1:20 ` NeilBrown
2016-12-25 20:09 ` daggs
2016-12-25 20:33 ` NeilBrown
2016-12-26 7:48 ` daggs
2016-12-26 11:19 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2016-12-26 18:54 ` daggs
2017-01-04 3:18 ` NeilBrown
2017-01-06 12:33 ` daggs
2017-01-07 3:14 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-03 13:31 ` daggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d1gfndin.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=daggs@gmx.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox