Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: daggs <daggs@gmx.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unable to mount nfs4 mount
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 22:19:44 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d1gfndin.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <trinity-161ef8fa-88f7-4128-85e2-cc4f1abb31a7-1482738488938@3capp-mailcom-bs14>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3005 bytes --]

On Mon, Dec 26 2016, daggs wrote:

> Greetings,
>
>> On Mon, Dec 26 2016, daggs wrote:
>> 
>> >> Can you strace mountd while you attempt a mount?
>> >> e.g.
>> >>   strace -o /tmp/trace -s 1000 -p 241
>> >> 
>> >> and send the /tmp/trace.
>> >> Also, after the attempt fails, run
>> >>  rpcdebug -m rpc -s cache
>> >>  grep . /proc/net/rpc/*/c*
>> >>  cat /proc/fs/nfsd/exports
>> >> 
>> >> and report the output.
>> >> 
>> > here:
>> >
>> > # cat /tmp/trace
>> > pselect6(1024, [3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12], NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) = 1 (in [3])
>> > read(3, "nfsd 10.0.0.1\n", 32768)       = 14
>> > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/run/nfs/etab", O_RDONLY) = 14
>> > fstat(14, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=435, ...}) = 0
>> > close(14)                               = 0
>> > write(3, "nfsd 10.0.0.1 2079 10.0.0.0/24 \n", 32) = 32
>> 
>> This is weird.
>> Here mountd is telling nfsd that when a request comes from IP address
>> 10.0.0.1, it should look for export entries associated with the client
>> name "10.0.0.0/24", which is good.
>> However the expiry time for that information is "2079", which is back in
>> January 1970.
>> When mountd writes that number, it computes it as
>>    time(0) + DEFAULT_TTL
>> where DEFAULT_TTL is (30 * 60)
>> Which suggests time(0) is "279".
>> 
>> What is the current time on this system?
>> 
>> If it really was very early on Jan 1st 1970, it should work, however...
>> 
>> 
>> > pselect6(1024, [3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12], NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL <detached ...>
>> > # rpcdebug -m rpc -s cache
>> > rpc        cache
>> > # grep . /proc/net/rpc/*/c*
>> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.gid/content:#uid cnt: gids...
>> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/channel:nfsd 10.0.0.1
>> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/channel:nfsd 10.0.0.1
>> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/content:#class IP domain
>> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/content:# expiry=2079 refcnt=1 flags=1
>> > /proc/net/rpc/auth.unix.ip/content:# nfsd 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.0/24
>> 
>> ...the fact that this line is commented out indicates that the entry in
>> the cache is already expired.  So the time must be after 2079.
>> 
>> Maybe the time is getting set from the network at an awkward time that
>> races with NFS service some how.
>> Can you find a way to run "exportfs -f" after the time has been set
>> correctly?
>> 
>> NeilBrown
>> 
>> 
>
> wait, I think I've seen this somewhere, does this feature needs rtc? this board doesn't have rtc component.
> for example, I cannot use openssh as ssh server because it needs rtc. I have to use dropbear.
> if so, this looks like it will affect nfsv3 mounts, am I right?

No, you shouldn't need an RTC.
You need the synchronize the clock with ntp or similar, else time stamps
on files will look wrong.
Though I think we fixed issues with wall-clock-time jumping in 2.6.37...

If you could try using "exportfs -f", and explain what does happen with
time - do you use ntp ?? - we might be able to make progress.

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-26 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-23 13:12 unable to mount nfs4 mount daggs
2016-12-24  3:29 ` NeilBrown
2016-12-24  7:11   ` daggs
2016-12-24 19:41     ` NeilBrown
2016-12-24 19:52       ` daggs
2016-12-25  1:20         ` NeilBrown
2016-12-25 20:09           ` daggs
2016-12-25 20:33             ` NeilBrown
2016-12-26  7:48               ` daggs
2016-12-26 11:19                 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2016-12-26 18:54                   ` daggs
2017-01-04  3:18                     ` NeilBrown
2017-01-06 12:33                       ` daggs
2017-01-07  3:14                         ` NeilBrown
2017-02-03 13:31                           ` daggs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d1gfndin.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=daggs@gmx.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox