From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] NFSD: fix misaligned DIO READ to not use a start_extra_page, exposes rpcrdma bug?
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 13:59:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92908105-9261-42f9-a0fd-ebfaf3e2f564@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2559f795-bdc9-4d39-aa03-e6a6d89e9f84@oracle.com>
On 9/2/25 11:56 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On 8/30/25 1:38 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> dt (j:1 t:1): File System Information:
>> dt (j:1 t:1): Mounted from device: 192.168.0.105:/hs_test
>> dt (j:1 t:1): Mounted on directory: /mnt/hs_test
>> dt (j:1 t:1): Filesystem type: nfs4
>> dt (j:1 t:1): Filesystem options: rw,relatime,vers=4.2,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,fatal_neterrors=none,proto=tcp,nconnect=16,port=20491,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=192.168.0.106,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.0.105
>
> I haven't been able to reproduce a similar failure in my lab with
> NFSv4.2 over RDMA with FDR InfiniBand. I've run dt 6-7 times, all
> successful. Also, for shit giggles, I tried the fsx-based subtests in
> fstests, no new failures there either. The export is xfs on an NVMe
> add-on card; server uses direct I/O for READ and page cache for WRITE.
>
> Notice the mount options for your test run: "proto=tcp" and
> "nconnect=16". Even if your network fabric is RoCE, "proto=tcp" will
> not use RDMA at all; it will use bog standard TCP/IP on your ultra
> fast Ethernet network.
>
> What should I try next? I can apply 2/2 or add "nconnect" or move the
> testing to my RoCE fabric after lunch and keep poking at it.
>
> Or, I could switch to TCP. Suggestions welcome.
The client is not sending any READ procedures/operations to the server.
The following is NFSv3 for clarity, but NFSv4.x results are similar:
nfsd-1669 [003] 1466.634816: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x7b2a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=NULL
nfsd-1669 [003] 1466.635389: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x7d2a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=FSINFO
nfsd-1669 [003] 1466.635420: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x7e2a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=PATHCONF
nfsd-1669 [003] 1466.635451: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x7f2a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=GETATTR
nfsd-1669 [003] 1466.635486: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x802a6274 service=nfsacl vers=3 proc=NULL
nfsd-1669 [003] 1466.635558: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x812a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=FSINFO
nfsd-1669 [003] 1466.635585: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x822a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=GETATTR
nfsd-1669 [003] 1470.029208: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x832a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=ACCESS
nfsd-1669 [003] 1470.029255: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x842a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=LOOKUP
nfsd-1669 [003] 1470.029296: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x852a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=FSSTAT
nfsd-1669 [003] 1470.039715: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x862a6274 service=nfsacl vers=3 proc=GETACL
nfsd-1669 [003] 1470.039758: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x872a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=CREATE
nfsd-1669 [003] 1470.040091: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x882a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=WRITE
nfsd-1669 [003] 1470.040469: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x892a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=GETATTR
nfsd-1669 [003] 1470.040503: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x8a2a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=ACCESS
nfsd-1669 [003] 1470.041867: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x8b2a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=FSSTAT
nfsd-1669 [003] 1470.042109: svc_process:
addr=192.168.2.67 xid=0x8c2a6274 service=nfsd vers=3 proc=REMOVE
So I'm probably missing some setting on the reproducer/client.
/mnt from klimt.ib.1015granger.net:/export/fast
Flags: rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,
fatal_neterrors=none,proto=rdma,port=20049,timeo=600,retrans=2,
sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.2.55,mountvers=3,mountproto=tcp,
local_lock=none,addr=192.168.2.55
Linux morisot.1015granger.net 6.15.10-100.fc41.x86_64 #1 SMP
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Aug 15 14:55:12 UTC 2025 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
Chuck Lever
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-26 18:57 [PATCH v8 0/7] NFSD: add "NFSD DIRECT" and "NFSD DONTCACHE" IO modes Mike Snitzer
2025-08-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] NFSD: filecache: add STATX_DIOALIGN and STATX_DIO_READ_ALIGN support Mike Snitzer
2025-08-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] NFSD: pass nfsd_file to nfsd_iter_read() Mike Snitzer
2025-08-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] NFSD: add io_cache_read controls to debugfs interface Mike Snitzer
2025-09-03 14:38 ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-03 15:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-03 16:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-03 16:12 ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-03 16:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] NFSD: add io_cache_write " Mike Snitzer
2025-08-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] NFSD: issue READs using O_DIRECT even if IO is misaligned Mike Snitzer
2025-08-27 15:34 ` Chuck Lever
2025-08-27 19:41 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-27 20:56 ` Chuck Lever
2025-08-27 23:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-28 1:57 ` Chuck Lever
2025-08-28 8:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-28 14:53 ` Chuck Lever
2025-08-28 18:52 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-30 17:38 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] some progress on rpcrdma bug [was: Re: [PATCH v8 5/7] NFSD: issue READs using O_DIRECT even if IO is misaligned] Mike Snitzer
2025-08-30 17:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] NFSD: fix misaligned DIO READ to not use a start_extra_page, exposes rpcrdma bug? Mike Snitzer
2025-09-02 14:04 ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-02 15:56 ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-02 17:59 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2025-09-02 21:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-02 21:16 ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-02 21:27 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-02 22:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-04 19:07 ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-04 21:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-04 14:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-04 15:12 ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-04 16:10 ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-04 16:33 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-04 17:54 ` Chuck Lever
2025-08-30 17:38 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] NFSD: use /end/ of rq_pages for front_pad page, simpler workaround for rpcrdma bug Mike Snitzer
2025-08-30 18:53 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] some progress on rpcrdma bug [was: Re: [PATCH v8 5/7] NFSD: issue READs using O_DIRECT even if IO is misaligned] Mike Snitzer
2025-08-28 16:36 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] NFSD: issue READs using O_DIRECT even if IO is misaligned Jeff Layton
2025-08-28 16:22 ` Jeff Layton
2025-08-28 16:27 ` Chuck Lever
2025-08-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] NFSD: issue WRITEs " Mike Snitzer
2025-08-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] NFSD: add nfsd_analyze_read_dio and nfsd_analyze_write_dio trace events Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92908105-9261-42f9-a0fd-ebfaf3e2f564@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox