Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] NFSD: add io_cache_read controls to debugfs interface
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 12:12:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b514a3b1-ae0e-4803-81e3-ef2d1de18a6d@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aLhmnwNasNnZIew1@kernel.org>

On 9/3/25 12:02 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 11:07:29AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 10:38:45AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> 
>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsd.h b/fs/nfsd/nfsd.h
>>>> index 1cd0bed57bc2f..6ef799405145f 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsd.h
>>>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsd.h
>>>> @@ -153,6 +153,15 @@ static inline void nfsd_debugfs_exit(void) {}
>>>>  
>>>>  extern bool nfsd_disable_splice_read __read_mostly;
>>>>  
>>>> +enum {
>>>> +	NFSD_IO_UNSPECIFIED = 0,
>>>> +	NFSD_IO_BUFFERED,
>>>> +	NFSD_IO_DONTCACHE,
>>>> +	NFSD_IO_DIRECT,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +extern u64 nfsd_io_cache_read __read_mostly;
>>>
>>> And then here, initialize nfsd_io_cache_read to reflect the default
>>> behavior. That would be NFSD_IO_BUFFERED for now... then later we might
>>> want to change it to NFSD_IO_DIRECT, for instance.
>>>
>>> Same suggestion for 4/7.
>>
>> Ah ok, I can see the way forward to default to NFSD_IO_BUFFERED but
>> _not_ default to it when erroring (if the user specified some unknown
>> value).
>>
>> I'll run with that (despite just asking Jeff's opinion above, I'm the
>> one who came up with the awkward UNSPECIFIED state when honoring
>> Jeff's early feedback).
> 
> Here is the incremental diff (these changes will be folded into
> appropriate patches in v9):
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/debugfs.c b/fs/nfsd/debugfs.c
> index 8878c3519b30c..173032a04cdec 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/debugfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/debugfs.c
> @@ -43,11 +43,10 @@ DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(nfsd_dsr_fops, nfsd_dsr_get, nfsd_dsr_set, "%llu\n");
>   * /sys/kernel/debug/nfsd/io_cache_read
>   *
>   * Contents:
> - *   %1: NFS READ will use buffered IO
> - *   %2: NFS READ will use dontcache (buffered IO w/ dropbehind)
> - *   %3: NFS READ will use direct IO
> + *   %0: NFS READ will use buffered IO
> + *   %1: NFS READ will use dontcache (buffered IO w/ dropbehind)
> + *   %2: NFS READ will use direct IO
>   *
> - * The default value of this setting is zero (UNSPECIFIED).
>   * This setting takes immediate effect for all NFS versions,
>   * all exports, and in all NFSD net namespaces.
>   */
> @@ -90,11 +89,10 @@ DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(nfsd_io_cache_read_fops, nfsd_io_cache_read_get,
>   * /sys/kernel/debug/nfsd/io_cache_write
>   *
>   * Contents:
> - *   %1: NFS WRITE will use buffered IO
> - *   %2: NFS WRITE will use dontcache (buffered IO w/ dropbehind)
> - *   %3: NFS WRITE will use direct IO
> + *   %0: NFS WRITE will use buffered IO
> + *   %1: NFS WRITE will use dontcache (buffered IO w/ dropbehind)
> + *   %2: NFS WRITE will use direct IO
>   *
> - * The default value of this setting is zero (UNSPECIFIED).
>   * This setting takes immediate effect for all NFS versions,
>   * all exports, and in all NFSD net namespaces.
>   */
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsd.h b/fs/nfsd/nfsd.h
> index fe935b4cda538..412a1e9a2a876 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsd.h
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsd.h
> @@ -154,8 +154,7 @@ static inline void nfsd_debugfs_exit(void) {}
>  extern bool nfsd_disable_splice_read __read_mostly;
>  
>  enum {
> -	NFSD_IO_UNSPECIFIED = 0,
> -	NFSD_IO_BUFFERED,
> +	NFSD_IO_BUFFERED = 0,

Thanks, this LGTM. Two additional remarks:

1. I think that the "= 0" is unneeded here because C enumerators always
start at 0.

2. I'm wondering if this enum definition should be moved to a uapi
header. Thoughts? This is experimental, and not a fixed API. So maybe
it needs to stay in fs/nfsd/nfsd.h.

(I'm probably going over ground that has already been covered.)


>  	NFSD_IO_DONTCACHE,
>  	NFSD_IO_DIRECT,
>  };
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> index 5e700a0d6b12e..403076443573f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> @@ -50,8 +50,8 @@
>  #define NFSDDBG_FACILITY		NFSDDBG_FILEOP
>  
>  bool nfsd_disable_splice_read __read_mostly;
> -u64 nfsd_io_cache_read __read_mostly;
> -u64 nfsd_io_cache_write __read_mostly;
> +u64 nfsd_io_cache_read __read_mostly = NFSD_IO_BUFFERED;
> +u64 nfsd_io_cache_write __read_mostly = NFSD_IO_BUFFERED;
>  
>  /**
>   * nfserrno - Map Linux errnos to NFS errnos
> @@ -1272,8 +1272,7 @@ __be32 nfsd_iter_read(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
>  		break;
>  	case NFSD_IO_DONTCACHE:
>  		kiocb.ki_flags = IOCB_DONTCACHE;
> -		fallthrough;
> -	case NFSD_IO_UNSPECIFIED:
> +		break;
>  	case NFSD_IO_BUFFERED:
>  		break;
>  	}
> @@ -1605,8 +1604,7 @@ nfsd_vfs_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
>  		break;
>  	case NFSD_IO_DONTCACHE:
>  		kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DONTCACHE;
> -		fallthrough;
> -	case NFSD_IO_UNSPECIFIED:
> +		fallthrough; /* must call nfsd_issue_write_buffered */

Right. In this case, the NFSD_IO_BUFFERED arm is more than just a
"break;" so, not as brittle as the nfsd_iter_read() switch statement.
The comment is helpful, though; I'm not suggesting a change, just
observing.


>  	case NFSD_IO_BUFFERED:
>  		host_err = nfsd_issue_write_buffered(rqstp, file,
>  						nvecs, cnt, &kiocb);


-- 
Chuck Lever

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-03 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-26 18:57 [PATCH v8 0/7] NFSD: add "NFSD DIRECT" and "NFSD DONTCACHE" IO modes Mike Snitzer
2025-08-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] NFSD: filecache: add STATX_DIOALIGN and STATX_DIO_READ_ALIGN support Mike Snitzer
2025-08-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] NFSD: pass nfsd_file to nfsd_iter_read() Mike Snitzer
2025-08-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] NFSD: add io_cache_read controls to debugfs interface Mike Snitzer
2025-09-03 14:38   ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-03 15:07     ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-03 16:02       ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-03 16:12         ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2025-09-03 16:50           ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] NFSD: add io_cache_write " Mike Snitzer
2025-08-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] NFSD: issue READs using O_DIRECT even if IO is misaligned Mike Snitzer
2025-08-27 15:34   ` Chuck Lever
2025-08-27 19:41     ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-27 20:56       ` Chuck Lever
2025-08-27 23:15         ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-28  1:57           ` Chuck Lever
2025-08-28  8:09             ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-28 14:53               ` Chuck Lever
2025-08-28 18:52                 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-30 17:38                   ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] some progress on rpcrdma bug [was: Re: [PATCH v8 5/7] NFSD: issue READs using O_DIRECT even if IO is misaligned] Mike Snitzer
2025-08-30 17:38                     ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] NFSD: fix misaligned DIO READ to not use a start_extra_page, exposes rpcrdma bug? Mike Snitzer
2025-09-02 14:04                       ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-02 15:56                       ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-02 17:59                         ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-02 21:06                           ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-02 21:16                             ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-02 21:27                               ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-02 22:18                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-04 19:07                                   ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-04 21:00                                     ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-04 14:42                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-04 15:12                                   ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-04 16:10                                   ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-04 16:33                                     ` Mike Snitzer
2025-09-04 17:54                                       ` Chuck Lever
2025-08-30 17:38                     ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] NFSD: use /end/ of rq_pages for front_pad page, simpler workaround for rpcrdma bug Mike Snitzer
2025-08-30 18:53                     ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] some progress on rpcrdma bug [was: Re: [PATCH v8 5/7] NFSD: issue READs using O_DIRECT even if IO is misaligned] Mike Snitzer
2025-08-28 16:36               ` [PATCH v8 5/7] NFSD: issue READs using O_DIRECT even if IO is misaligned Jeff Layton
2025-08-28 16:22       ` Jeff Layton
2025-08-28 16:27         ` Chuck Lever
2025-08-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] NFSD: issue WRITEs " Mike Snitzer
2025-08-26 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] NFSD: add nfsd_analyze_read_dio and nfsd_analyze_write_dio trace events Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b514a3b1-ae0e-4803-81e3-ef2d1de18a6d@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox