From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Did the in-kernel Camellia or CMAC crypto implementation break?
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 18:18:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDkoiqPXwIRYmeF3@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1239035.1681467430@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 11:17:10AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
>
> There would be just two users at the moment: sunrpc/nfs and rxrpc/afs. I
> don't know if cifs or ceph could make use of it.
Interesting. Could you outline how this new interface would work?
And have you looked whether the aead interface could fit into your
model?
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-14 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-12 15:56 Did the in-kernel Camellia or CMAC crypto implementation break? David Howells
2023-04-12 16:57 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-04-12 17:44 ` Scott Mayhew
2023-04-12 17:50 ` David Howells
2023-04-13 6:07 ` Herbert Xu
2023-04-13 6:36 ` David Howells
2023-04-13 6:40 ` Herbert Xu
2023-04-13 8:59 ` David Howells
2023-04-13 13:55 ` David Howells
2023-04-14 2:08 ` Herbert Xu
2023-04-14 8:47 ` David Howells
2023-04-14 8:52 ` Herbert Xu
2023-04-14 10:17 ` David Howells
2023-04-14 10:18 ` Herbert Xu [this message]
2023-04-14 10:34 ` David Howells
2023-04-14 11:04 ` Herbert Xu
2023-04-14 12:32 ` David Howells
2023-05-22 21:07 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZDkoiqPXwIRYmeF3@gondor.apana.org.au \
--to=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smayhew@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox