* [PATCH 0/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on fatal connection error
@ 2025-06-09 21:43 Tigran Mkrtchyan
2025-06-09 21:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Tigran Mkrtchyan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tigran Mkrtchyan @ 2025-06-09 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nfs; +Cc: Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker, Tigran Mkrtchyan
As mentioned in the thread
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/601285843.50695650.1748800817824.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de/T/#u
We observe that interrupted batch processing jobs put the client into an unrecoverable state that requires
the client host reboot. Finally, I was able to build a custom kernel with all required third-party drivers to prove
my assumption. So indeed, marking pNFS device unavailable fixes the issue. Thus, please consider the proposed
change and backport it to older kernels. I did testing with (which is not part of the patch) and will try to
add a trace point as soon as I find out how to implement one.
Tigran Mkrtchyan (1):
pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on fatal connection error
fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on fatal connection error
2025-06-09 21:43 [PATCH 0/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on fatal connection error Tigran Mkrtchyan
@ 2025-06-09 21:43 ` Tigran Mkrtchyan
2025-06-25 19:19 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tigran Mkrtchyan @ 2025-06-09 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nfs; +Cc: Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker, Tigran Mkrtchyan
Fixes: 260f32adb88 ("pNFS/flexfiles: Check the result of nfs4_pnfs_ds_connect")
When an applications get killed (SIGTERM/SIGINT) while pNFS client performs a connection
to DS, client ends in an infinite loop of connect-disconnect. This
source of the issue, it that flexfilelayoutdev#nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds gets an error
on nfs4_pnfs_ds_connect with status ERESTARTSYS, which is set by rpc_signal_task, but
the error is treated as transient, thus retried.
The issue is reproducible with script as (there should be ~1000 files in
a directory, client should must not have any connections to DSes):
```
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
for i in *
do
head -1 $i &
PP=$!
sleep 10e-03
kill -TERM $PP
done
```
Signed-off-by: Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
---
fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
index 4a304cf17c4b..0008a8180c9b 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
@@ -410,6 +410,10 @@ nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
mirror->mirror_ds->ds_versions[0].wsize = max_payload;
goto out;
}
+ /* There is a fatal error to connect to DS. Mark it unavailable to avoid infinite retry loop. */
+ if (nfs_error_is_fatal(status))
+ nfs4_mark_deviceid_unavailable(&mirror->mirror_ds->id_node);
+
noconnect:
ff_layout_track_ds_error(FF_LAYOUT_FROM_HDR(lseg->pls_layout),
mirror, lseg->pls_range.offset,
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on fatal connection error
2025-06-09 21:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Tigran Mkrtchyan
@ 2025-06-25 19:19 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
2025-06-25 19:39 ` Trond Myklebust
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mkrtchyan, Tigran @ 2025-06-25 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nfs; +Cc: Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2188 bytes --]
Hi Folks,
Do you have any opinion on this one? Would you like me to address it differently?
Tigran.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tigran Mkrtchyan" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
> To: "linux-nfs" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: "Trond Myklebust" <trondmy@kernel.org>, "Anna Schumaker" <anna@kernel.org>, "Tigran Mkrtchyan"
> <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
> Sent: Monday, 9 June, 2025 23:43:03
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on fatal connection error
> Fixes: 260f32adb88 ("pNFS/flexfiles: Check the result of nfs4_pnfs_ds_connect")
>
> When an applications get killed (SIGTERM/SIGINT) while pNFS client performs a
> connection
> to DS, client ends in an infinite loop of connect-disconnect. This
> source of the issue, it that flexfilelayoutdev#nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds gets an
> error
> on nfs4_pnfs_ds_connect with status ERESTARTSYS, which is set by
> rpc_signal_task, but
> the error is treated as transient, thus retried.
>
> The issue is reproducible with script as (there should be ~1000 files in
> a directory, client should must not have any connections to DSes):
>
> ```
> echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> for i in *
> do
> head -1 $i &
> PP=$!
> sleep 10e-03
> kill -TERM $PP
> done
> ```
>
> Signed-off-by: Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
> ---
> fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> index 4a304cf17c4b..0008a8180c9b 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> @@ -410,6 +410,10 @@ nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
> mirror->mirror_ds->ds_versions[0].wsize = max_payload;
> goto out;
> }
> + /* There is a fatal error to connect to DS. Mark it unavailable to avoid
> infinite retry loop. */
> + if (nfs_error_is_fatal(status))
> + nfs4_mark_deviceid_unavailable(&mirror->mirror_ds->id_node);
> +
> noconnect:
> ff_layout_track_ds_error(FF_LAYOUT_FROM_HDR(lseg->pls_layout),
> mirror, lseg->pls_range.offset,
> --
> 2.49.0
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 2826 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on fatal connection error
2025-06-25 19:19 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
@ 2025-06-25 19:39 ` Trond Myklebust
2025-06-26 9:17 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Trond Myklebust @ 2025-06-25 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mkrtchyan, Tigran, linux-nfs; +Cc: Anna Schumaker
On Wed, 2025-06-25 at 21:19 +0200, Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Do you have any opinion on this one? Would you like me to address it
> differently?
>
I don't think we should mark the device as being unavailable just
because someone signalled the RPC task.
It would be better to have nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds() return any fatal
errors that it encounters using ERR_PTR(), so that the callers can
handle them. Then maybe return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN) for the case where we
currently return NULL so that those callers don't have to use the hated
IS_ERR_OR_NULL() test.
> Tigran.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tigran Mkrtchyan" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
> > To: "linux-nfs" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
> > Cc: "Trond Myklebust" <trondmy@kernel.org>, "Anna Schumaker"
> > <anna@kernel.org>, "Tigran Mkrtchyan"
> > <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
> > Sent: Monday, 9 June, 2025 23:43:03
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on
> > fatal connection error
>
> > Fixes: 260f32adb88 ("pNFS/flexfiles: Check the result of
> > nfs4_pnfs_ds_connect")
> >
> > When an applications get killed (SIGTERM/SIGINT) while pNFS client
> > performs a
> > connection
> > to DS, client ends in an infinite loop of connect-disconnect. This
> > source of the issue, it that
> > flexfilelayoutdev#nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds gets an
> > error
> > on nfs4_pnfs_ds_connect with status ERESTARTSYS, which is set by
> > rpc_signal_task, but
> > the error is treated as transient, thus retried.
> >
> > The issue is reproducible with script as (there should be ~1000
> > files in
> > a directory, client should must not have any connections to DSes):
> >
> > ```
> > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> >
> > for i in *
> > do
> > head -1 $i &
> > PP=$!
> > sleep 10e-03
> > kill -TERM $PP
> > done
> > ```
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
> > ---
> > fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> > b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> > index 4a304cf17c4b..0008a8180c9b 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> > @@ -410,6 +410,10 @@ nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds(struct
> > pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
> > mirror->mirror_ds->ds_versions[0].wsize =
> > max_payload;
> > goto out;
> > }
> > + /* There is a fatal error to connect to DS. Mark it
> > unavailable to avoid
> > infinite retry loop. */
> > + if (nfs_error_is_fatal(status))
> > + nfs4_mark_deviceid_unavailable(&mirror->mirror_ds-
> > >id_node);
> > +
> > noconnect:
> > ff_layout_track_ds_error(FF_LAYOUT_FROM_HDR(lseg-
> > >pls_layout),
> > mirror, lseg->pls_range.offset,
> > --
> > 2.49.0
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trondmy@kernel.org, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on fatal connection error
2025-06-25 19:39 ` Trond Myklebust
@ 2025-06-26 9:17 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mkrtchyan, Tigran @ 2025-06-26 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trond Myklebust; +Cc: linux-nfs, Anna Schumaker
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3601 bytes --]
I posted a different patch with the suggested approach.
Tigran.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Trond Myklebust" <trondmy@kernel.org>
> To: "Tigran Mkrtchyan" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>, "linux-nfs" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: "Anna Schumaker" <anna@kernel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 June, 2025 21:39:15
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on fatal connection error
> On Wed, 2025-06-25 at 21:19 +0200, Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote:
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Do you have any opinion on this one? Would you like me to address it
>> differently?
>>
>
> I don't think we should mark the device as being unavailable just
> because someone signalled the RPC task.
>
> It would be better to have nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds() return any fatal
> errors that it encounters using ERR_PTR(), so that the callers can
> handle them. Then maybe return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN) for the case where we
> currently return NULL so that those callers don't have to use the hated
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL() test.
>
>> Tigran.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Tigran Mkrtchyan" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
>> > To: "linux-nfs" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
>> > Cc: "Trond Myklebust" <trondmy@kernel.org>, "Anna Schumaker"
>> > <anna@kernel.org>, "Tigran Mkrtchyan"
>> > <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
>> > Sent: Monday, 9 June, 2025 23:43:03
>> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on
>> > fatal connection error
>>
>> > Fixes: 260f32adb88 ("pNFS/flexfiles: Check the result of
>> > nfs4_pnfs_ds_connect")
>> >
>> > When an applications get killed (SIGTERM/SIGINT) while pNFS client
>> > performs a
>> > connection
>> > to DS, client ends in an infinite loop of connect-disconnect. This
>> > source of the issue, it that
>> > flexfilelayoutdev#nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds gets an
>> > error
>> > on nfs4_pnfs_ds_connect with status ERESTARTSYS, which is set by
>> > rpc_signal_task, but
>> > the error is treated as transient, thus retried.
>> >
>> > The issue is reproducible with script as (there should be ~1000
>> > files in
>> > a directory, client should must not have any connections to DSes):
>> >
>> > ```
>> > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>> >
>> > for i in *
>> > do
>> > head -1 $i &
>> > PP=$!
>> > sleep 10e-03
>> > kill -TERM $PP
>> > done
>> > ```
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
>> > ---
>> > fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c | 4 ++++
>> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
>> > b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
>> > index 4a304cf17c4b..0008a8180c9b 100644
>> > --- a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
>> > +++ b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
>> > @@ -410,6 +410,10 @@ nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds(struct
>> > pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
>> > mirror->mirror_ds->ds_versions[0].wsize =
>> > max_payload;
>> > goto out;
>> > }
>> > + /* There is a fatal error to connect to DS. Mark it
>> > unavailable to avoid
>> > infinite retry loop. */
>> > + if (nfs_error_is_fatal(status))
>> > + nfs4_mark_deviceid_unavailable(&mirror->mirror_ds-
>> > >id_node);
>> > +
>> > noconnect:
>> > ff_layout_track_ds_error(FF_LAYOUT_FROM_HDR(lseg-
>> > >pls_layout),
>> > mirror, lseg->pls_range.offset,
>> > --
>> > 2.49.0
>
> --
> Trond Myklebust
> Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
> trondmy@kernel.org, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 2826 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-06-26 9:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-09 21:43 [PATCH 0/1] pNFS/flexfiles: mark device unavailable on fatal connection error Tigran Mkrtchyan
2025-06-09 21:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Tigran Mkrtchyan
2025-06-25 19:19 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
2025-06-25 19:39 ` Trond Myklebust
2025-06-26 9:17 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox