* Benchmark between EXT3/4, Btrfs, Nilfs and XFS (article)
@ 2009-06-29 8:35 Tako Schotanus
[not found] ` <8641fd7c0906290135g4ce4f2c0veb85239ee1363d5c-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tako Schotanus @ 2009-06-29 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 144 bytes --]
Maybe you've already read it but for those who haven't:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ext4_btrfs_nilfs2&num=1
--
-Tako
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 314 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 158 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org
https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Benchmark between EXT3/4, Btrfs, Nilfs and XFS (article)
[not found] ` <8641fd7c0906290135g4ce4f2c0veb85239ee1363d5c-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-29 9:27 ` Reinoud Zandijk
[not found] ` <20090629092745.GC14991-5cYspOl2ggRz6xQTk39kMVfVdRo2wo/d@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Reinoud Zandijk @ 2009-06-29 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NILFS Users mailing list
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:35:36AM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
> Maybe you've already read it but for those who haven't:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ext4_btrfs_nilfs2&num=1
It just shows that NiLFS is better suited for SSD media :) I predict SSD will
replace the older harddisc technology in the end. Its just waiting for volume
and flash chips getting bigger and cheaper.
With regards,
Reinoud
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Benchmark between EXT3/4, Btrfs, Nilfs and XFS (article)
[not found] ` <20090629092745.GC14991-5cYspOl2ggRz6xQTk39kMVfVdRo2wo/d@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-29 10:03 ` Tako Schotanus
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tako Schotanus @ 2009-06-29 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NILFS Users mailing list
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1010 bytes --]
Well personally I wasn't looking for speed anyway, I just wanted the
snapshotting features of NILFS and as long as the performance is reasonable
I'm a happy camper :)
(Now if somebody would only make a Fedora 11 package so I can access the
data I have ona a backup disk :) )
-Tako
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:27, Reinoud Zandijk <reinoud-S783fYmB3Ccdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:35:36AM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
> > Maybe you've already read it but for those who haven't:
> >
> >
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ext4_btrfs_nilfs2&num=1
>
> It just shows that NiLFS is better suited for SSD media :) I predict SSD
> will
> replace the older harddisc technology in the end. Its just waiting for
> volume
> and flash chips getting bigger and cheaper.
>
> With regards,
> Reinoud
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org
> https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1649 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 158 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org
https://www.nilfs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-29 10:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-29 8:35 Benchmark between EXT3/4, Btrfs, Nilfs and XFS (article) Tako Schotanus
[not found] ` <8641fd7c0906290135g4ce4f2c0veb85239ee1363d5c-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-29 9:27 ` Reinoud Zandijk
[not found] ` <20090629092745.GC14991-5cYspOl2ggRz6xQTk39kMVfVdRo2wo/d@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-29 10:03 ` Tako Schotanus
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox