From: Ryusuke Konishi <ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>
To: lihong.hi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Cc: konishi.ryusuke-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org,
linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] nilfs2: change sc_timer from a pointer to an embedded one in struct nilfs_sc_info
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:40:22 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100411.114022.199103512.ryusuke@osrg.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100410161752.GC9213@xhl>
Hi,
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:17:52 +0800, Li Hong <lihong.hi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> In nilfs_segctor_thread(), timer is a local variable allocated on stack. Its
> address can't be set to sci->sc_timer and passed in several procedures.
>
> It works now by chance, just because other procedures are called by
> nilfs_segctor_thread() directly or indirectly and the stack hasn't been
> deallocated yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Hong <lihong.hi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Looks to be heading in the right direction.
Note that the del_timer_sync call in nilfs_segctor_thread() should be
moved into nilfs_segctor_destroy() for safety. Without the check if
sci->sc_timer != NULL, sci->sc_timer can be registered to the timer
list after the segment constructor thread died. This leads to
corruption of the timer list.
add_timer(&sci->sc_timer) is called only while nilfs->ns_segctor_sem
(i.e. nilfs_transaction_lock) is held.
So, the place where del_timer_sync should be inserted, seems between
down_write(&sbi->s_nilfs->ns_segctor_sem)
and
kfree()
in nilfs_segctor_destroy().
Thanks,
Ryusuke Konishi
> ---
> fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 31 +++++++++++++------------------
> fs/nilfs2/segment.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
> index dd3c4d5..310979a 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
> @@ -2158,9 +2158,9 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_do_construct(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci, int mode)
> static void nilfs_segctor_start_timer(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci)
> {
> spin_lock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
> - if (sci->sc_timer && !(sci->sc_state & NILFS_SEGCTOR_COMMIT)) {
> - sci->sc_timer->expires = jiffies + sci->sc_interval;
> - add_timer(sci->sc_timer);
> + if (!(sci->sc_state & NILFS_SEGCTOR_COMMIT)) {
> + sci->sc_timer.expires = jiffies + sci->sc_interval;
> + add_timer(&sci->sc_timer);
> sci->sc_state |= NILFS_SEGCTOR_COMMIT;
> }
> spin_unlock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
> @@ -2365,9 +2365,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_accept(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci)
> spin_lock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
> sci->sc_seq_accepted = sci->sc_seq_request;
> spin_unlock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
> -
> - if (sci->sc_timer)
> - del_timer_sync(sci->sc_timer);
> + del_timer_sync(&sci->sc_timer);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -2393,9 +2391,9 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_notify(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci, int mode, int err)
> sci->sc_flush_request &= ~FLUSH_DAT_BIT;
>
> /* re-enable timer if checkpoint creation was not done */
> - if (sci->sc_timer && (sci->sc_state & NILFS_SEGCTOR_COMMIT) &&
> - time_before(jiffies, sci->sc_timer->expires))
> - add_timer(sci->sc_timer);
> + if ((sci->sc_state & NILFS_SEGCTOR_COMMIT) &&
> + time_before(jiffies, sci->sc_timer.expires))
> + add_timer(&sci->sc_timer);
> }
> spin_unlock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
> }
> @@ -2574,13 +2572,10 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_thread(void *arg)
> {
> struct nilfs_sc_info *sci = (struct nilfs_sc_info *)arg;
> struct the_nilfs *nilfs = sci->sc_sbi->s_nilfs;
> - struct timer_list timer;
> int timeout = 0;
>
> - init_timer(&timer);
> - timer.data = (unsigned long)current;
> - timer.function = nilfs_construction_timeout;
> - sci->sc_timer = &timer;
> + sci->sc_timer.data = (unsigned long)current;
> + sci->sc_timer.function = nilfs_construction_timeout;
>
> /* start sync. */
> sci->sc_task = current;
> @@ -2629,7 +2624,7 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_thread(void *arg)
> should_sleep = 0;
> else if (sci->sc_state & NILFS_SEGCTOR_COMMIT)
> should_sleep = time_before(jiffies,
> - sci->sc_timer->expires);
> + sci->sc_timer.expires);
>
> if (should_sleep) {
> spin_unlock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
> @@ -2638,7 +2633,7 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_thread(void *arg)
> }
> finish_wait(&sci->sc_wait_daemon, &wait);
> timeout = ((sci->sc_state & NILFS_SEGCTOR_COMMIT) &&
> - time_after_eq(jiffies, sci->sc_timer->expires));
> + time_after_eq(jiffies, sci->sc_timer.expires));
>
> if (nilfs_sb_dirty(nilfs) && nilfs_sb_need_update(nilfs))
> set_nilfs_discontinued(nilfs);
> @@ -2647,8 +2642,7 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_thread(void *arg)
>
> end_thread:
> spin_unlock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
> - del_timer_sync(sci->sc_timer);
> - sci->sc_timer = NULL;
> + del_timer_sync(&sci->sc_timer);
>
> /* end sync. */
> sci->sc_task = NULL;
> @@ -2707,6 +2701,7 @@ static struct nilfs_sc_info *nilfs_segctor_new(struct nilfs_sb_info *sbi)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sci->sc_write_logs);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sci->sc_gc_inodes);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sci->sc_copied_buffers);
> + init_timer(&sci->sc_timer);
>
> sci->sc_interval = HZ * NILFS_SC_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT;
> sci->sc_mjcp_freq = HZ * NILFS_SC_DEFAULT_SR_FREQ;
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.h b/fs/nilfs2/segment.h
> index 7aca765..dca1423 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.h
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.h
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ struct nilfs_sc_info {
> unsigned long sc_lseg_stime; /* in 1/HZ seconds */
> unsigned long sc_watermark;
>
> - struct timer_list *sc_timer;
> + struct timer_list sc_timer;
> struct task_struct *sc_task;
> };
>
> --
> 1.6.3.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-11 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-10 16:15 [PATCH 1/3] nilfs2: remove nilfs_segctor_init() in segment.c Li Hong
2010-04-10 16:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] nilfs2: nilfs_segctor_destroy() should do a full job Li Hong
2010-04-10 16:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] nilfs2: change sc_timer from a pointer to an embedded one in struct nilfs_sc_info Li Hong
2010-04-11 2:40 ` Ryusuke Konishi [this message]
[not found] ` <20100411.114022.199103512.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-11 4:29 ` Li Hong
2010-04-11 9:08 ` Li Hong
2010-04-11 9:47 ` Ryusuke Konishi
2010-04-10 18:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] nilfs2: nilfs_segctor_destroy() should do a full job Ryusuke Konishi
[not found] ` <20100411.031005.204131803.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-11 4:27 ` Li Hong
2010-04-11 8:15 ` Ryusuke Konishi
[not found] ` <20100411.171551.04175650.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-11 8:29 ` Li Hong
2010-04-10 17:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] nilfs2: remove nilfs_segctor_init() in segment.c Ryusuke Konishi
[not found] ` <20100411.025715.33555818.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-11 4:17 ` Li Hong
2010-04-11 7:58 ` Ryusuke Konishi
[not found] ` <20100411.165847.77342547.ryusuke-sG5X7nlA6pw@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-11 8:22 ` Li Hong
2010-04-11 8:40 ` Ryusuke Konishi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100411.114022.199103512.ryusuke@osrg.net \
--to=ryusuke-sg5x7nla6pw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=konishi.ryusuke-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lihong.hi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).