* [PATCH] Revert "nvme: create 'slaves' and 'holders' entries for hidden controllers"
@ 2018-03-07 13:13 Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-07 13:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-03-09 8:51 ` Johannes Thumshirn
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2018-03-07 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
This reverts commit e9a48034d7d1318ece7d4a235838a86c94db9d68.
The slaves and holders link for the hidden gendisks confuse lsblk so that
it errors out on, or doesn't report the nvme multipath devices. Given
that we don't need holder relationships for something that can't even be
directly accessed we should just stop creating those links.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
Reported-by: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat at chelsio.com>
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 2 --
drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c | 30 ------------------------------
drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h | 8 --------
3 files changed, 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 817e5e2766da..7aeca5db7916 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -3033,7 +3033,6 @@ static void nvme_alloc_ns(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, unsigned nsid)
ns->disk->disk_name);
nvme_mpath_add_disk(ns->head);
- nvme_mpath_add_disk_links(ns);
return;
out_unlink_ns:
mutex_lock(&ctrl->subsys->lock);
@@ -3053,7 +3052,6 @@ static void nvme_ns_remove(struct nvme_ns *ns)
return;
if (ns->disk && ns->disk->flags & GENHD_FL_UP) {
- nvme_mpath_remove_disk_links(ns);
sysfs_remove_group(&disk_to_dev(ns->disk)->kobj,
&nvme_ns_id_attr_group);
if (ns->ndev)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
index b7e5c6db4d92..060f69e03427 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
@@ -210,25 +210,6 @@ void nvme_mpath_add_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
mutex_unlock(&head->subsys->lock);
}
-void nvme_mpath_add_disk_links(struct nvme_ns *ns)
-{
- struct kobject *slave_disk_kobj, *holder_disk_kobj;
-
- if (!ns->head->disk)
- return;
-
- slave_disk_kobj = &disk_to_dev(ns->disk)->kobj;
- if (sysfs_create_link(ns->head->disk->slave_dir, slave_disk_kobj,
- kobject_name(slave_disk_kobj)))
- return;
-
- holder_disk_kobj = &disk_to_dev(ns->head->disk)->kobj;
- if (sysfs_create_link(ns->disk->part0.holder_dir, holder_disk_kobj,
- kobject_name(holder_disk_kobj)))
- sysfs_remove_link(ns->head->disk->slave_dir,
- kobject_name(slave_disk_kobj));
-}
-
void nvme_mpath_remove_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
{
if (!head->disk)
@@ -243,14 +224,3 @@ void nvme_mpath_remove_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
blk_cleanup_queue(head->disk->queue);
put_disk(head->disk);
}
-
-void nvme_mpath_remove_disk_links(struct nvme_ns *ns)
-{
- if (!ns->head->disk)
- return;
-
- sysfs_remove_link(ns->disk->part0.holder_dir,
- kobject_name(&disk_to_dev(ns->head->disk)->kobj));
- sysfs_remove_link(ns->head->disk->slave_dir,
- kobject_name(&disk_to_dev(ns->disk)->kobj));
-}
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
index 0521e4707d1c..d733b14ede9d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
@@ -410,9 +410,7 @@ bool nvme_req_needs_failover(struct request *req, blk_status_t error);
void nvme_kick_requeue_lists(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
int nvme_mpath_alloc_disk(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,struct nvme_ns_head *head);
void nvme_mpath_add_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head);
-void nvme_mpath_add_disk_links(struct nvme_ns *ns);
void nvme_mpath_remove_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head);
-void nvme_mpath_remove_disk_links(struct nvme_ns *ns);
static inline void nvme_mpath_clear_current_path(struct nvme_ns *ns)
{
@@ -454,12 +452,6 @@ static inline void nvme_mpath_add_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
static inline void nvme_mpath_remove_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
{
}
-static inline void nvme_mpath_add_disk_links(struct nvme_ns *ns)
-{
-}
-static inline void nvme_mpath_remove_disk_links(struct nvme_ns *ns)
-{
-}
static inline void nvme_mpath_clear_current_path(struct nvme_ns *ns)
{
}
--
2.14.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH] Revert "nvme: create 'slaves' and 'holders' entries for hidden controllers"
2018-03-07 13:13 [PATCH] Revert "nvme: create 'slaves' and 'holders' entries for hidden controllers" Christoph Hellwig
@ 2018-03-07 13:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-03-07 15:03 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-09 8:51 ` Johannes Thumshirn
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2018-03-07 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 03/07/2018 02:13 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This reverts commit e9a48034d7d1318ece7d4a235838a86c94db9d68.
>
> The slaves and holders link for the hidden gendisks confuse lsblk so that
> it errors out on, or doesn't report the nvme multipath devices. Given
> that we don't need holder relationships for something that can't even be
> directly accessed we should just stop creating those links.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> Reported-by: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat at chelsio.com>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 2 --
> drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c | 30 ------------------------------
> drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h | 8 --------
> 3 files changed, 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 817e5e2766da..7aeca5db7916 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -3033,7 +3033,6 @@ static void nvme_alloc_ns(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, unsigned nsid)
> ns->disk->disk_name);
>
> nvme_mpath_add_disk(ns->head);
> - nvme_mpath_add_disk_links(ns);
> return;
> out_unlink_ns:
> mutex_lock(&ctrl->subsys->lock);
> @@ -3053,7 +3052,6 @@ static void nvme_ns_remove(struct nvme_ns *ns)
> return;
>
> if (ns->disk && ns->disk->flags & GENHD_FL_UP) {
> - nvme_mpath_remove_disk_links(ns);
> sysfs_remove_group(&disk_to_dev(ns->disk)->kobj,
> &nvme_ns_id_attr_group);
> if (ns->ndev)
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
> index b7e5c6db4d92..060f69e03427 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
> @@ -210,25 +210,6 @@ void nvme_mpath_add_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
> mutex_unlock(&head->subsys->lock);
> }
>
> -void nvme_mpath_add_disk_links(struct nvme_ns *ns)
> -{
> - struct kobject *slave_disk_kobj, *holder_disk_kobj;
> -
> - if (!ns->head->disk)
> - return;
> -
> - slave_disk_kobj = &disk_to_dev(ns->disk)->kobj;
> - if (sysfs_create_link(ns->head->disk->slave_dir, slave_disk_kobj,
> - kobject_name(slave_disk_kobj)))
> - return;
> -
> - holder_disk_kobj = &disk_to_dev(ns->head->disk)->kobj;
> - if (sysfs_create_link(ns->disk->part0.holder_dir, holder_disk_kobj,
> - kobject_name(holder_disk_kobj)))
> - sysfs_remove_link(ns->head->disk->slave_dir,
> - kobject_name(slave_disk_kobj));
> -}
> -
> void nvme_mpath_remove_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
> {
> if (!head->disk)
> @@ -243,14 +224,3 @@ void nvme_mpath_remove_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
> blk_cleanup_queue(head->disk->queue);
> put_disk(head->disk);
> }
> -
> -void nvme_mpath_remove_disk_links(struct nvme_ns *ns)
> -{
> - if (!ns->head->disk)
> - return;
> -
> - sysfs_remove_link(ns->disk->part0.holder_dir,
> - kobject_name(&disk_to_dev(ns->head->disk)->kobj));
> - sysfs_remove_link(ns->head->disk->slave_dir,
> - kobject_name(&disk_to_dev(ns->disk)->kobj));
> -}
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> index 0521e4707d1c..d733b14ede9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> @@ -410,9 +410,7 @@ bool nvme_req_needs_failover(struct request *req, blk_status_t error);
> void nvme_kick_requeue_lists(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
> int nvme_mpath_alloc_disk(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,struct nvme_ns_head *head);
> void nvme_mpath_add_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head);
> -void nvme_mpath_add_disk_links(struct nvme_ns *ns);
> void nvme_mpath_remove_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head);
> -void nvme_mpath_remove_disk_links(struct nvme_ns *ns);
>
> static inline void nvme_mpath_clear_current_path(struct nvme_ns *ns)
> {
> @@ -454,12 +452,6 @@ static inline void nvme_mpath_add_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
> static inline void nvme_mpath_remove_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
> {
> }
> -static inline void nvme_mpath_add_disk_links(struct nvme_ns *ns)
> -{
> -}
> -static inline void nvme_mpath_remove_disk_links(struct nvme_ns *ns)
> -{
> -}
> static inline void nvme_mpath_clear_current_path(struct nvme_ns *ns)
> {
> }
>
The nice thing about the holders/slave is that one can discover the
topology, and potentially figure out any issues (like one path going
down etc).
How do we detect the topology now?
Does nvme cli has the functionality?
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare at suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg
GF: F. Imend?rffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH] Revert "nvme: create 'slaves' and 'holders' entries for hidden controllers"
2018-03-07 13:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
@ 2018-03-07 15:03 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-07 15:56 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2018-03-08 22:45 ` Keith Busch
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Keith Busch @ 2018-03-07 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018@02:40:39PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> The nice thing about the holders/slave is that one can discover the
> topology, and potentially figure out any issues (like one path going
> down etc).
I also thought the sysfs hierarchy was useful, but it sounds like causes
more problems than it solves. :(
> How do we detect the topology now?
> Does nvme cli has the functionality?
Not in the way you'd probably like. It can provide all the information
you'd need to put it together, but it doesn't provide a convenient
method to get or visualize it. I'll add a note on the project to fix
that.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Revert "nvme: create 'slaves' and 'holders' entries for hidden controllers"
2018-03-07 15:03 ` Keith Busch
@ 2018-03-07 15:56 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2018-03-07 17:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-08 22:45 ` Keith Busch
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Sitsofe Wheeler @ 2018-03-07 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 7 March 2018@15:03, Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018@02:40:39PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> The nice thing about the holders/slave is that one can discover the
>> topology, and potentially figure out any issues (like one path going
>> down etc).
>
> I also thought the sysfs hierarchy was useful, but it sounds like causes
> more problems than it solves. :(
The problem is that it's the first of its kind in regard to virtual
slaves/devices and many of the consumers of block device sysfs simply
weren't ready for it to appear where it did. Perhaps if it had been a
different part of sysfs hierarchy and/or linked up a different way
(virtual-slaves/?) it would have been invisible to programs that
weren't ready to consume it...
--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Revert "nvme: create 'slaves' and 'holders' entries for hidden controllers"
2018-03-07 15:56 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
@ 2018-03-07 17:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-07 17:38 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-08 17:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2018-03-07 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018@03:56:36PM +0000, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> The problem is that it's the first of its kind in regard to virtual
> slaves/devices and many of the consumers of block device sysfs simply
> weren't ready for it to appear where it did. Perhaps if it had been a
> different part of sysfs hierarchy and/or linked up a different way
> (virtual-slaves/?) it would have been invisible to programs that
> weren't ready to consume it...
Yes, I think we should simply creates a paths/ directory. Not sure
there is much point in the backlink.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Revert "nvme: create 'slaves' and 'holders' entries for hidden controllers"
2018-03-07 17:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2018-03-07 17:38 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-07 17:47 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2018-03-08 17:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Keith Busch @ 2018-03-07 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018@06:18:05PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Yes, I think we should simply creates a paths/ directory. Not sure
> there is much point in the backlink.
That sounds good to me. For now, looks like we need the revert for the
current rc and stable; applied to nvme-4.16-rc5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Revert "nvme: create 'slaves' and 'holders' entries for hidden controllers"
2018-03-07 17:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-07 17:38 ` Keith Busch
@ 2018-03-08 17:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2018-03-08 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
>> The problem is that it's the first of its kind in regard to virtual
>> slaves/devices and many of the consumers of block device sysfs simply
>> weren't ready for it to appear where it did. Perhaps if it had been a
>> different part of sysfs hierarchy and/or linked up a different way
>> (virtual-slaves/?) it would have been invisible to programs that
>> weren't ready to consume it...
>
> Yes, I think we should simply creates a paths/ directory. Not sure
> there is much point in the backlink.
I'm good with this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Revert "nvme: create 'slaves' and 'holders' entries for hidden controllers"
2018-03-07 15:03 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-07 15:56 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
@ 2018-03-08 22:45 ` Keith Busch
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Keith Busch @ 2018-03-08 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018@08:03:45AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018@02:40:39PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > How do we detect the topology now?
> > Does nvme cli has the functionality?
>
> Not in the way you'd probably like. It can provide all the information
> you'd need to put it together, but it doesn't provide a convenient
> method to get or visualize it. I'll add a note on the project to fix
> that.
Actually, nvmecli already has something kind of close, thanks
to Johannes! The 'list-subsys' command is most of the way there. It
currently looks like this, and just needs to go one level deeper to
append the namespaces to the output:
# nvme list-subsys -o json
{
"Subsystems" : [
{
"Name" : "nvme-subsys0",
"NQN" : "nqn.2014.08.org.nvmexpress:8086108ePHLE7200015N6P4B7335943:ICDPC5ED2ORA6.4T"
},
{
"Paths" : [
{
"Name" : "nvme0",
"Transport" : "pcie",
"Address" : "0000:03:00.0"
},
{
"Name" : "nvme1",
"Transport" : "pcie",
"Address" : "0000:04:00.0"
}
]
}
]
}
While this should readily work for fabrics, I needed to add a new kernel
driver patch to export the PCIe address for the above (patch staged
for 4.17).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Revert "nvme: create 'slaves' and 'holders' entries for hidden controllers"
2018-03-07 13:13 [PATCH] Revert "nvme: create 'slaves' and 'holders' entries for hidden controllers" Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-07 13:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
@ 2018-03-09 8:51 ` Johannes Thumshirn
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Thumshirn @ 2018-03-09 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn at suse.de>
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumshirn at suse.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg
GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-03-09 8:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-03-07 13:13 [PATCH] Revert "nvme: create 'slaves' and 'holders' entries for hidden controllers" Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-07 13:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-03-07 15:03 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-07 15:56 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2018-03-07 17:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-07 17:38 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-07 17:47 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2018-03-07 20:37 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-07 21:42 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2018-03-08 17:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-03-08 22:45 ` Keith Busch
2018-03-09 8:51 ` Johannes Thumshirn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox