From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] nvme: enable multipathing by default
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:47:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181120184749.GF26707@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181120162734.2013-2-hch@lst.de>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018@05:27:32PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> And make it a little more clear that the only reason to disable it is
> to optimize for size in constrained environment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig b/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig
> index 88a8b5916624..d2ae6954ce7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig
> @@ -16,12 +16,20 @@ config BLK_DEV_NVME
> config NVME_MULTIPATH
> bool "NVMe multipath support"
> depends on NVME_CORE
> + default y
> ---help---
> This option enables support for multipath access to NVMe
> subsystems. If this option is enabled only a single
> /dev/nvmeXnY device will show up for each NVMe namespaces,
> even if it is accessible through multiple controllers.
>
> + Say Y here unless you need to optimize for size in embedded
> + systems that are never going to see multi-port NVMe devices.
> +
> + If you say N multiple ports of the same subsystem will show
> + up as separate devices, and none of the normal block device
> + exclusion mechanisms will work.
> +
> config NVME_FABRICS
> tristate
This is okay with me, but I have one little follow-on I'd like to RFC here:
The /dev/nvme naming convention with multiplath has broken people's
minds, and making it default will invite a lot of repeat questions on
how to match up block to admin handles.
Could we promote /dev/nvme0 to be a subsystem handle instead of a
controller handle, and add new per-controller handles, like /dev/nvme0c1,
nvme0c2, etc...? The subsystem handle's management interface can just use
the first active controller to forward admin commands, and per-controller
specific administration can be taught to use the new handles as needed.
Tooling shouldn't care about the names, but I am not sure if this could
possibly break productino scripts. The naming disconnect has broken
some things, though, so I hope this doesn't end up being a pick your
poision suggestion...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-20 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-20 16:27 tweak multipath kconfig and options Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20 16:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme: enable multipathing by default Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20 18:47 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-11-21 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-22 2:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-11-26 15:40 ` Keith Busch
2018-11-20 16:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme: warn when finding multi-port subsystems without multipathing enabled Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-22 2:45 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-11-20 16:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme: deprecate the multipath=0 module option Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-22 2:49 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-11-27 15:06 ` [PATCH 3/3 v2] " Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181120184749.GF26707@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox