Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: osandov@osandov.com (Omar Sandoval)
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] block: improve logic around when to sort a plug list
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:31:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181127233142.GB846@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181126163556.5181-3-axboe@kernel.dk>

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018@09:35:50AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Do it for the nr_hw_queues == 1 case, but only do it for the multi queue
> case if we have requests for multiple devices in the plug.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk>
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c       | 1 +
>  block/blk-mq.c         | 7 +++++--
>  include/linux/blkdev.h | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index be9233400314..c9758d185357 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -1780,6 +1780,7 @@ void blk_start_plug(struct blk_plug *plug)
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&plug->mq_list);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&plug->cb_list);
>  	plug->rq_count = 0;
> +	plug->do_sort = false;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Store ordering should not be needed here, since a potential
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 99c66823d52f..6a249bf6ed00 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1678,7 +1678,8 @@ void blk_mq_flush_plug_list(struct blk_plug *plug, bool from_schedule)
>  	list_splice_init(&plug->mq_list, &list);
>  	plug->rq_count = 0;
>  
> -	list_sort(NULL, &list, plug_rq_cmp);
> +	if (plug->do_sort)
> +		list_sort(NULL, &list, plug_rq_cmp);
>  
>  	this_q = NULL;
>  	this_hctx = NULL;
> @@ -1935,6 +1936,7 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_mq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  
>  		list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &plug->mq_list);
>  		plug->rq_count++;
> +		plug->do_sort = true;
>  	} else if (plug && !blk_queue_nomerges(q)) {
>  		blk_mq_bio_to_request(rq, bio);
>  
> @@ -1958,7 +1960,8 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_mq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  			data.hctx = same_queue_rq->mq_hctx;
>  			blk_mq_try_issue_directly(data.hctx, same_queue_rq,
>  					&cookie);
> -		}
> +		} else if (plug->rq_count > 1)
> +			plug->do_sort = true;

If plug->rq_count == 2, there's no benefit to sorting, either. The
nr_hw_queues == 1 case could also avoid sorting in that case. So maybe
this whole patch could just be replaced with:

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 7b7dff85cf6c..de93c14e4700 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1675,9 +1675,10 @@ void blk_mq_flush_plug_list(struct blk_plug *plug, bool from_schedule)
 	unsigned int depth;
 
 	list_splice_init(&plug->mq_list, &list);
-	plug->rq_count = 0;
 
-	list_sort(NULL, &list, plug_rq_cmp);
+	if (plug->rq_count > 2)
+		list_sort(NULL, &list, plug_rq_cmp);
+	plug->rq_count = 0;
 
 	this_q = NULL;
 	this_hctx = NULL;

That will also handle the multi-queue case since we only plug one
request per multi-queue device. Thoughts?

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-27 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-26 16:35 [PATCHSET 0/8] block plugging improvements Jens Axboe
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 1/8] block: sum requests in the plug structure Jens Axboe
2018-11-26 17:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 2/8] block: improve logic around when to sort a plug list Jens Axboe
2018-11-27 23:31   ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2018-11-27 23:49     ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-27 23:55       ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-27 23:59       ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-28  0:05         ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-28  0:16           ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: add mq_ops->commit_rqs() Jens Axboe
2018-11-27 23:43   ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-28  1:38   ` Ming Lei
2018-11-28  7:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-28 12:54     ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 4/8] nvme: implement mq_ops->commit_rqs() hook Jens Axboe
2018-11-28  7:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-28 13:07     ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 5/8] virtio_blk: " Jens Axboe
2018-11-27 23:45   ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-28  3:05     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-11-28  2:10   ` Ming Lei
2018-11-28  2:34     ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-29  1:23       ` Ming Lei
2018-11-29  2:19         ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-29  2:51           ` Ming Lei
2018-11-29  3:13             ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-29  3:27               ` Ming Lei
2018-11-29  3:53                 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-28  7:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 6/8] ataflop: " Jens Axboe
2018-11-27 23:46   ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-28  7:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-28 13:09     ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: use bd->last == true for list inserts Jens Axboe
2018-11-27 23:49   ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-27 23:51     ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-28  1:49   ` Ming Lei
2018-11-28  2:37     ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: add plug case for devices that implement ->commits_rqs() Jens Axboe
2018-11-28  7:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-28 13:11     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181127233142.GB846@vader \
    --to=osandov@osandov.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox