Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] nvme: retry commands based on ACRE flag
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:52:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210120005236.GD4205@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210119180535.GA1520627@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com>

On 21-01-20 03:28:38, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 06:40:51PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 03:26:02AM +0900, Minwoo Im wrote:
> > > > I am not sure we should ignore the FAILFAST for non-path errors. If we
> > > > need retryable admin commands, we should let the driver provide a way
> > > > for callers to dispatch requests without that flag.
> > > 
> > > Understood.  I thought the opposite way about FAILFAST in case with
> > > acre, if device is enabled with acre, all commands would be retried
> > > regardless to FAILFAST...  Thanks for pointing that out!
> > > 
> > > How do you think which one is right choice to go with if a user-space
> > > application(e.g., nvme-cli) wants a command to be retired in case of
> > > ACRE && Error && !DNR:
> > > 
> > >   - User-space application should figure out !DNR and retry the command.
> > >     (Maybe we are not able to easily figure out exact status code from
> > >     the user-space application by the return value).
> > > 
> > >   - Driver should retry the command right before putting result up to
> > >     the user-space even it's a FAILFAST request.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > 
> > We could come up with a version of the ioctls that use the normal
> > retry mechanisms.  nvme_passthru_cmd64 has two reserved fields we
> > could use for UAPI flags like this.
> 
> Yeah, I'm totally okay with adding driver control flags for this sort of
> behavior.
> 
> For the moment, the ioctl interface has always been 1:1 for commands
> submitted to completions received, so all user space applications using
> this should have been prepared to receive unfiltered status back and
> handle retries on their own.

Thanks Keith for your feedback!

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

      reply	other threads:[~2021-01-20  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-14 13:31 [PATCH V3 0/3] nvme: fixes for command retry Minwoo Im
2021-01-14 13:31 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] nvme: check all retry delay times in Identify Controller Minwoo Im
2021-01-19  3:43   ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-14 13:31 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] nvme: introduce acre flag in nvme_ctrl Minwoo Im
2021-01-15  2:16   ` Chao Leng
2021-01-14 13:31 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] nvme: retry commands based on ACRE flag Minwoo Im
2021-01-15  2:17   ` Chao Leng
2021-01-15 17:04   ` Keith Busch
2021-01-15 18:26     ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-18 17:40       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-19  3:30         ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-19 18:28         ` Keith Busch
2021-01-20  0:52           ` Minwoo Im [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210120005236.GD4205@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=lengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox