From: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>
To: <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me,
axboe@fb.com, kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] nvme-fabrics: avoid double request completion for nvmf_fail_nonready_command
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:15:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210126081539.13320-4-lengchao@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210126081539.13320-1-lengchao@huawei.com>
When reconnect, the request may be completed with NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR
in nvmf_fail_nonready_command. The state of request will be changed to
MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT before call nvme_complete_rq. If free the request
asynchronously such as in nvme_submit_user_cmd, in extreme scenario
the request may be completed again in tear down process.
nvmf_fail_nonready_command do not need calling blk_mq_start_request
before complete the request. nvmf_fail_nonready_command should set
the state of request to MQ_RQ_COMPLETE before complete the request.
Signed-off-by: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>
---
drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c
index 72ac00173500..40f40c0debc1 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c
@@ -553,9 +553,7 @@ blk_status_t nvmf_fail_nonready_command(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
!blk_noretry_request(rq) && !(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NVME_MPATH))
return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
- nvme_req(rq)->status = NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR;
- blk_mq_start_request(rq);
- nvme_complete_rq(rq);
+ nvme_complete_failed_rq(rq, NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR);
return BLK_STS_OK;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmf_fail_nonready_command);
--
2.16.4
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-26 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-26 8:15 [PATCH v4 0/5] avoid double request completion and IO error Chao Leng
2021-01-26 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_set_request_complete Chao Leng
2021-01-27 16:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 1:34 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-26 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] nvme-core: introduce complete failed request Chao Leng
2021-01-26 8:15 ` Chao Leng [this message]
2021-01-26 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] nvme-rdma: avoid IO error for nvme native multipath Chao Leng
2021-01-28 8:39 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-01-28 9:31 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29 1:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-01-29 2:48 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29 3:24 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-01-29 3:30 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29 3:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-01-29 3:50 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29 3:37 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-26 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] nvme-fc: " Chao Leng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210126081539.13320-4-lengchao@huawei.com \
--to=lengchao@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox