Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: axboe@fb.com (Jens Axboe)
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] nvme-blkmq fixes
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:54:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5499AC69.2010706@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5499AB17.6060805@fb.com>

On 12/23/2014 10:49 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/22/2014 06:34 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2014, Keith Busch wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2014, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> Should be enough to just check for ->rq_pool being initialized or not
>>>> - if it is, we could have waiters and we know the waitqueues have
>>>> been setup, etc.
>>>>
>>>> V2 attached.
>>>
>>> Yep, that fixes the bug.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure I follow your suggestion for forcing bt_get() to abandon
>>> allocating a request tag when the queue is dying. If hctx_may_queue()
>>> fails, it returns a generic error and bt_get() reschedules itself.
>>> Should
>>> a different error than -1 be returned if the queue is dying?
>>
>> We're making good incremental improvements, but finding oddities the
>> more I test this. This one's a doozy.
>>
>> Requeued IO's are automatically dispatched, and I don't see an
>> immediately
>> available way stop them. It causes a bug because the queue doorbells are
>> unmapped during reset, so you can't touch them when the queue should be
>> quiesced. I could fix that by having the driver not kick the requeue_list
>> when it knows a reset is in progress, but there's no immediate way
>> to drain the list if the reset fails and the device requires removal,
>> and blk_cleanup_queue() will be stuck.
>>
>> Is there something available to call that I'm missing or do I need to
>> add more removal handling?
>
> So that's actually a case where having the queues auto-started on
> requeue run is harmful, since we should be able to handle this situation
> by stopping queues, requeueing, and then having a helper to eventually
> abort pending requeued work, if we have to. But if you simply requeue
> them and defer kicking the requeue list it might work. At that point
> you'd either kick the requeues (and hence start processing them) if
> things went well on the reset, or we could have some
> blk_mq_abort_requeues() helper that'd kill them with -EIO instead. Would
> that work for you?

Something like this.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: blk-mq-abort-requeue-list.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1461 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/attachments/20141223/b92098c3/attachment.bin>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-23 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-20  0:54 [PATCH 0/4] nvme-blkmq fixes Keith Busch
2014-12-20  0:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] blk-mq: Exit queue on alloc failure Keith Busch
2014-12-20  0:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] blk-mq: Export freeze/unfreeze functions Keith Busch
2014-12-20  0:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] NVMe: Fix double free irq Keith Busch
2014-12-22 15:15   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-12-20  0:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] NVMe: Freeze queues on shutdown Keith Busch
2014-12-20 17:32 ` [PATCH 0/4] nvme-blkmq fixes Jens Axboe
2014-12-20 19:29   ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-22 16:38     ` Keith Busch
2014-12-22 16:47       ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-22 18:17         ` Keith Busch
2014-12-22 18:19           ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-22 20:08             ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-22 21:01               ` Keith Busch
2014-12-23  1:34                 ` Keith Busch
2014-12-23 17:49                   ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-23 17:54                     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2014-12-23 18:09                       ` Keith Busch
2014-12-23 21:10                       ` Keith Busch
2014-12-23 21:23                         ` Keith Busch
2014-12-23 21:24                           ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-31  2:31                             ` Keith Busch
2014-12-31 16:38                               ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-05 15:17                                 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-05 19:30                                   ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-05 20:19                                     ` Keith Busch
2015-01-05 20:20                                       ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5499AC69.2010706@fb.com \
    --to=axboe@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox