From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] nvmet-tcp: support secure channel concatenation
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 09:34:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b754a67-0f35-43a7-b650-40b26c968aa8@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee8c31e1-31fe-47e0-9c60-61d3292851e0@grimberg.me>
On 7/18/24 00:36, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>
> On 17/07/2024 12:10, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Evaluate the SC_C flag during DH-CHAP-HMAC negotiation and insert
>> the generated PSK once negotiation has finished.
>
> Will look in details at the patch, but first a question,
> IIRC TLS enabled ports should only allow host to connect
> over TLS. How does this change now?
>
It didn't. We always had the possibility to set 'treq' to
'not required', which then will allow for either.
(In case you wondered: that was implemented with the last
patch to my TLS series, implementing a 'peek' on icreq to
figure out whether TLS should be started or not.)
> Plus, what does the discovery service tell hosts about such
> discovery log entries?
That's what the 'treq' bits are for; 'required' means you
have to use TLS, 'not required' means you _may_ use TLS
(ie both TLS and none-TLS connections are allowed).
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-18 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-17 9:10 [PATCHv5 00/16] nvme: implement secure concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 01/16] nvme-keyring: restrict match length for version '1' identifiers Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 21:47 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 02/16] nvme-tcp: sanitize TLS key handling Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 21:53 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-18 7:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 03/16] nvme-tcp: check for invalidated or revoked key Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 21:55 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 04/16] nvme: add a newline to the 'tls_key' sysfs attribute Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 21:55 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 05/16] nvme-sysfs: add 'tls_configured_key' " Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 21:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-18 7:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 06/16] nvme-sysfs: add 'tls_keyring' attribute Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 21:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 07/16] crypto,fs: Separate out hkdf_extract() and hkdf_expand() Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 21:39 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 08/16] nvme: add nvme_auth_generate_psk() Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 09/16] nvme: add nvme_auth_generate_digest() Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 10/16] nvme: add nvme_auth_derive_tls_psk() Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 22:01 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 11/16] nvme-keyring: add nvme_tls_psk_refresh() Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 22:04 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 12/16] nvme-tcp: request secure channel concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 22:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-18 7:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 13/16] nvme-fabrics: reset admin connection for secure concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 22:32 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 14/16] nvmet-auth: allow to clear DH-HMAC-CHAP keys Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 22:32 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 15/16] nvme-target: do not check authentication status for admin commands twice Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 22:33 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 16/16] nvmet-tcp: support secure channel concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-17 22:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-18 7:34 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2024-07-17 21:38 ` [PATCHv5 00/16] nvme: implement secure concatenation Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-18 6:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b754a67-0f35-43a7-b650-40b26c968aa8@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox