From: ednadols@linux.microsoft.com (Edmund Nadolski)
Subject: [PATCH, RFC 1/2] nvme: change locking for the per-subsystem controller list
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 09:47:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b9497da-a1d1-84ed-f59c-ef602297a2aa@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190508075508.28552-1-hch@lst.de>
On 5/8/19 12:55 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Life becomes a lot simpler if we just use the global
> nvme_subsystems_lock to protect this list. Given that it is only
> accessed during controller probing and removal that isn't a scalability
> problem either.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index eebaeadaa800..4f4ffcce7416 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -2346,13 +2346,11 @@ static int nvme_active_ctrls(struct nvme_subsystem *subsys)
> int count = 0;
> struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl;
>
> - mutex_lock(&subsys->lock);
> list_for_each_entry(ctrl, &subsys->ctrls, subsys_entry) {
> if (ctrl->state != NVME_CTRL_DELETING &&
> ctrl->state != NVME_CTRL_DEAD)
> count++;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&subsys->lock);
>
> return count;
> }
Would lockdep_assert_held(&nvme_subsystems_lock); be beneficial here?
Thanks,
Ed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-08 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-08 7:55 [PATCH, RFC 1/2] nvme: change locking for the per-subsystem controller list Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-08 7:55 ` [PATCH, RFC 2/2] nvme: validate cntlid during controller initialisation Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-08 14:28 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-09 6:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-08 18:51 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-09 6:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-08 16:47 ` Edmund Nadolski [this message]
2019-05-09 6:17 ` [PATCH, RFC 1/2] nvme: change locking for the per-subsystem controller list Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-09 21:43 ` Edmund Nadolski
2019-05-08 22:42 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-09 5:13 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b9497da-a1d1-84ed-f59c-ef602297a2aa@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=ednadols@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox