Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ednadols@linux.microsoft.com (Edmund Nadolski)
Subject: [PATCH, RFC 1/2] nvme: change locking for the per-subsystem controller list
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 14:43:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc2d70e6-3607-a4f2-c8a7-a41220ea5085@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190509061716.GD15229@lst.de>

On 5/8/19 11:17 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2019@09:47:42AM -0700, Edmund Nadolski wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>>> index eebaeadaa800..4f4ffcce7416 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>>> @@ -2346,13 +2346,11 @@ static int nvme_active_ctrls(struct nvme_subsystem *subsys)
>>>   	int count = 0;
>>>   	struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl;
>>>   -	mutex_lock(&subsys->lock);
>>>   	list_for_each_entry(ctrl, &subsys->ctrls, subsys_entry) {
>>>   		if (ctrl->state != NVME_CTRL_DELETING &&
>>>   		    ctrl->state != NVME_CTRL_DEAD)
>>>   			count++;
>>>   	}
>>> -	mutex_unlock(&subsys->lock);
>>>     	return count;
>>>   }
>>
>> Would lockdep_assert_held(&nvme_subsystems_lock); be beneficial here?
> 
> It certainly would not hurt, although it seems a little overkill for
> a trivial helper with a single caller.

True, the thought is that it would be indicative that subsys->lock is not
needed in this context.

Ed

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-09 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-08  7:55 [PATCH, RFC 1/2] nvme: change locking for the per-subsystem controller list Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-08  7:55 ` [PATCH, RFC 2/2] nvme: validate cntlid during controller initialisation Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-08 14:28   ` Keith Busch
2019-05-09  6:15     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-08 18:51   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-09  6:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-08 16:47 ` [PATCH, RFC 1/2] nvme: change locking for the per-subsystem controller list Edmund Nadolski
2019-05-09  6:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-09 21:43     ` Edmund Nadolski [this message]
2019-05-08 22:42 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-09  5:13   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc2d70e6-3607-a4f2-c8a7-a41220ea5085@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=ednadols@linux.microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox