public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] nvme/auth: optimize code redundancy and provide code quality
@ 2024-01-15  6:52 mengfanhui
  2024-01-15 12:51 ` Sagi Grimberg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: mengfanhui @ 2024-01-15  6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbusch, axboe; +Cc: mengfanhui, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, sagi

Improve code quality. Reduce code redundancy.

Signed-off-by: mengfanhui <mengfanhui@kylinos.cn>
---
 drivers/nvme/common/auth.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/common/auth.c b/drivers/nvme/common/auth.c
index a23ab5c968b9..4f9d06afdc38 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/common/auth.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/common/auth.c
@@ -250,9 +250,7 @@ struct nvme_dhchap_key *nvme_auth_transform_key(
 	if (key->hash == 0) {
 		key_len = nvme_auth_key_struct_size(key->len);
 		transformed_key = kmemdup(key, key_len, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!transformed_key)
-			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-		return transformed_key;
+		return transformed_key ? transformed_key : ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
 	hmac_name = nvme_auth_hmac_name(key->hash);
 	if (!hmac_name) {

base-commit: c29901006179c4c87f9335771e50814ec5707239
-- 
2.25.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] nvme/auth: optimize code redundancy and provide code quality
  2024-01-15  6:52 [PATCH] nvme/auth: optimize code redundancy and provide code quality mengfanhui
@ 2024-01-15 12:51 ` Sagi Grimberg
  2024-01-15 22:21   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2024-01-15 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mengfanhui, kbusch, axboe; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-nvme


> Improve code quality. Reduce code redundancy.

Why does this improve code quality? Why does this
reduce code redundancy?

It's just a different style, seems like a useless change to me.

> 
> Signed-off-by: mengfanhui <mengfanhui@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>   drivers/nvme/common/auth.c | 4 +---
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/common/auth.c b/drivers/nvme/common/auth.c
> index a23ab5c968b9..4f9d06afdc38 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/common/auth.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/common/auth.c
> @@ -250,9 +250,7 @@ struct nvme_dhchap_key *nvme_auth_transform_key(
>   	if (key->hash == 0) {
>   		key_len = nvme_auth_key_struct_size(key->len);
>   		transformed_key = kmemdup(key, key_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!transformed_key)
> -			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> -		return transformed_key;
> +		return transformed_key ? transformed_key : ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>   	}
>   	hmac_name = nvme_auth_hmac_name(key->hash);
>   	if (!hmac_name) {
> 
> base-commit: c29901006179c4c87f9335771e50814ec5707239


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] nvme/auth: optimize code redundancy and provide code quality
  2024-01-15 12:51 ` Sagi Grimberg
@ 2024-01-15 22:21   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni @ 2024-01-15 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mengfanhui
  Cc: Sagi Grimberg, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, kbusch@kernel.org


>> +        return transformed_key ? transformed_key : ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);

I've received many comments about not using ?: in kernel code as
if .. else is preferred way, not sure if this is a good idea

-ck



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-15 22:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-15  6:52 [PATCH] nvme/auth: optimize code redundancy and provide code quality mengfanhui
2024-01-15 12:51 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-01-15 22:21   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox