Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: OMAP2: MUSB: Specify omap4 has mailbox

[Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1782 bytes --]

Hi again,

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 01:03:55PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:57:13AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 11:28:11AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> > > Added has_mailbox to the musb platform data to specify that omap uses
> > > an external mailbox (in control module) to communicate with the musb
> > > core during device connect and disconnect.
> > 
> > So, I've been through your five patches looking for any other users of
> > "has_mailbox" and I can find none.  You introduce this in this patch,
> > and you set it.  But I don't see anything that uses it.
> > 
> > Write only variables are not useful.
> 
> looking back at what I sent Greg this was probably my fault. When taking
> Kishon's patches (in particular $SUBJECT) I removed some of arch/arm/
> code and ended up forgetting to add the include file which introduces
> has_mailbox.
> 
> This means that my lack of attention has introduced a compile break on
> Greg's tree. Oh well, s**t happens. In any case, the user is already in
> Greg's tree and there's no way Greg will rebase his tree to amend
> $SUBJECT there, so it will have to go separately.
> 
> I didn't even notice this before because I had the diff in my tree, just
> forgot to git add and/or git reset. Too late now

there's a little more to it. When running allmodconfig,
CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM is set but none of the other ARCHes
(ARCH_OMAP, ARCH_AT91, ARCH_VERSATILE, etc) are set, so it turned out
that the driver wasn't even included on my build test.

Russell, is this expected (the MULTIPLATFORM thing) ? Just so I fix my
build test scripts to use another defconfig instead of allmod and
allyes.

cheers

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]