From: David Rivshin <drivshin@awxrd.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: omap: compute debounce-time from actual debounce-clock rate
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:53:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170420095341.6c919e40.drivshin@awxrd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d0fab0d-bc9d-5148-063c-8bfe9e26f9a5@ti.com>
On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 19:06:47 -0500
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:
> CC: Tero
Gentle ping. Any thoughts on this? Is there anything I should
investigate, or other information you'd like me to provide?
> On 03/17/2017 06:14 PM, David Rivshin wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 14:43:02 -0500
> > Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/16/2017 07:57 PM, David Rivshin wrote:
> >>> From: David Rivshin <DRivshin@allworx.com>
> >>>
> >>> omap2_set_gpio_debounce() assumes the debounce clock runs at 32768Hz,
> >>> leading to 31us granularity. In reality the debounce clock (which
> >>> is provided by other modules) could be at different rate, leading to
> >>> an incorrect computation of the number of debounce clock cycles for
> >>> GPIO_DEBOUNCINGTIME[DEBOUNCETIME].
> >>>
> >>> Also, even with a standard 32768Hz input clock, the actual granularity
> >>> is ~30.5us. This leads to the actual debounce time being ~1.5% too
> >>> short.
> >>>
> >>> Fix both issues by simply querying the dbck rate, rather than
> >>> hardcoding.
> >>
> >> Pls, hold on with this - I'm trying to check it, as it doesn't follow TRMs.
> >
> > Yes, the TRMs are somewhat cryptic about the details, perhaps I can give
> > some more background on how I came to this. I think the chapters for the
> > GPIO block are written with a strong assumption that the input debounce
> > clock is 32768Hz, and further round 1/32768Hz to the nearest whole
> > microsecond (~30.5us->31us).
> >
> > However, at least on AM335x the debounce clock (i.e. the CLK_32KHZ) can
> > be made to run at other rates via the Control Module.
> >
> > Here is an example from clk_summary:
> > clk_24mhz 1 1 24000000 0 0
> > clkdiv32k_ck 1 1 65536 0 0
> > clkdiv32k_ick 2 6 65536 0 0
> > timer7_fck 1 1 65536 0 0
> > wdt1_fck 0 1 65536 0 0
> > gpio3_dbclk 0 2 65536 0 0
> > gpio2_dbclk 0 2 65536 0 0
> > gpio1_dbclk 0 2 65536 0 0
> >
> > This is accomplished by setting clk32kdivratio_ctl[clkdivopp50_en] to 1
> > even while in OPP100, and adjusting the devicetree to match. Timer7 is
> > known to truly have a 65536Hz fck by configuring it as a 50% duty cycle
> > PWM and measuring with an oscilloscope.
> >
> > Here are some relevant sections from the AM335x TRM (spruh73o):
> > 25.2.2 GPIO Clock and Reset Management
> > Debounce Functional clock (GPIO[123]) comes from CLK_32KHZ.
> > 8.1.6.8 Peripheral PLL Description
> > CLK_32KHZ is CLK_24 divided by either 732.4219 or 366.2109.
> > In OPP100 this results in either 32768Hz or 65536Hz.
> > In OPP50 this results in either 16384Hz or 32768Hz.
> > 9.3.1.8 clk32kdivratio_ctrl Register
> > Names of the register and field differ from 8.1.6.8, but it's
> > clear they are the same.
> >
> > I'm not sure if other devices can be similarly cajoled into running
> > their equivalent 32KHZ clocks at a different rate, but it certainly
> > works for AM335x. Checking OMAP4430 TRM as an example makes it look
> > like OMAP44xx has a fixed 32768Hz clock with no adjustment possible
> > (backed up by omap44xx-clocks.dtsi having it just be a fixed-clock).
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: e85ec6c3047b ("gpio: omap: fix omap2_set_gpio_debounce")
> >>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.3+
> >>> Signed-off-by: David Rivshin <drivshin@allworx.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> This logical bug existed before e85ec6c3047b, but if backporting
> >>> further it's probably best to just cherry-pick/backport e85ec6c3047b
> >>> first.
> >>>
> >>> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 8 +++++---
> >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> >>> index 33ec02d..865a831 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> >>> @@ -205,8 +205,8 @@ static inline void omap_gpio_dbck_disable(struct gpio_bank *bank)
> >>> * @offset: the gpio number on this @bank
> >>> * @debounce: debounce time to use
> >>> *
> >>> - * OMAP's debounce time is in 31us steps
> >>> - * <debounce time> = (GPIO_DEBOUNCINGTIME[7:0].DEBOUNCETIME + 1) x 31
> >>> + * OMAP's debounce time is in 1/DBCK steps
> >>> + * <debounce time> = (GPIO_DEBOUNCINGTIME[7:0].DEBOUNCETIME + 1) / DBCK
> >>> * so we need to convert and round up to the closest unit.
> >>> *
> >>> * Return: 0 on success, negative error otherwise.
> >>> @@ -223,7 +223,9 @@ static int omap2_set_gpio_debounce(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset,
> >>> return -ENOTSUPP;
> >>>
> >>> if (enable) {
> >>> - debounce = DIV_ROUND_UP(debounce, 31) - 1;
> >>> + u64 tmp = (u64)debounce * clk_get_rate(bank->dbck);
> >>> +
> >>> + debounce = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(tmp, 1000000) - 1;
> >>> if ((debounce & OMAP4_GPIO_DEBOUNCINGTIME_MASK) != debounce)
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-20 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170317005704.11971-1-drivshin@awxrd.com>
[not found] ` <20170317005704.11971-2-drivshin@awxrd.com>
2017-03-17 16:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: omap: return error if requested debounce time is not possible Grygorii Strashko
2017-03-17 17:54 ` David Rivshin
2017-03-17 18:54 ` Grygorii Strashko
2017-03-17 20:50 ` David Rivshin
2017-03-17 21:43 ` Grygorii Strashko
2017-03-17 23:42 ` David Rivshin
2017-04-20 14:44 ` David Rivshin
2017-04-20 15:19 ` Grygorii Strashko
[not found] ` <20170317005704.11971-3-drivshin@awxrd.com>
2017-03-17 19:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: omap: compute debounce-time from actual debounce-clock rate Grygorii Strashko
2017-03-17 23:14 ` David Rivshin
2017-03-18 0:06 ` Grygorii Strashko
2017-04-20 13:53 ` David Rivshin [this message]
2017-03-17 1:48 [PATCH 0/2] gpio: omap: set_debounce fixes David Rivshin
2017-03-17 1:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: omap: compute debounce-time from actual debounce-clock rate David Rivshin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170420095341.6c919e40.drivshin@awxrd.com \
--to=drivshin@awxrd.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox