Linux on ARM based TI OMAP SoCs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: David Rivshin <drivshin@awxrd.com>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: omap: compute debounce-time from actual debounce-clock rate
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 19:06:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d0fab0d-bc9d-5148-063c-8bfe9e26f9a5@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170317191419.021bdd84.drivshin@awxrd.com>

CC: Tero

On 03/17/2017 06:14 PM, David Rivshin wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 14:43:02 -0500
> Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:
>
>> On 03/16/2017 07:57 PM, David Rivshin wrote:
>>> From: David Rivshin <DRivshin@allworx.com>
>>>
>>> omap2_set_gpio_debounce() assumes the debounce clock runs at 32768Hz,
>>> leading to 31us granularity. In reality the debounce clock (which
>>> is provided by other modules) could be at different rate, leading to
>>> an incorrect computation of the number of debounce clock cycles for
>>> GPIO_DEBOUNCINGTIME[DEBOUNCETIME].
>>>
>>> Also, even with a standard 32768Hz input clock, the actual granularity
>>> is ~30.5us. This leads to the actual debounce time being ~1.5% too
>>> short.
>>>
>>> Fix both issues by simply querying the dbck rate, rather than
>>> hardcoding.
>>
>> Pls, hold on with this - I'm trying to check it, as it doesn't follow TRMs.
>
> Yes, the TRMs are somewhat cryptic about the details, perhaps I can give
> some more background on how I came to this. I think the chapters for the
> GPIO block are written with a strong assumption that the input debounce
> clock is 32768Hz, and further round 1/32768Hz to the nearest whole
> microsecond (~30.5us->31us).
>
> However, at least on AM335x the debounce clock (i.e. the CLK_32KHZ) can
> be made to run at other rates via the Control Module.
>
> Here is an example from clk_summary:
>  clk_24mhz                    1            1    24000000          0 0
>     clkdiv32k_ck              1            1       65536          0 0
>        clkdiv32k_ick          2            6       65536          0 0
>           timer7_fck          1            1       65536          0 0
>           wdt1_fck            0            1       65536          0 0
>           gpio3_dbclk         0            2       65536          0 0
>           gpio2_dbclk         0            2       65536          0 0
>           gpio1_dbclk         0            2       65536          0 0
>
> This is accomplished by setting clk32kdivratio_ctl[clkdivopp50_en] to 1
> even while in OPP100, and adjusting the devicetree to match. Timer7 is
> known to truly have a 65536Hz fck by configuring it as a 50% duty cycle
> PWM and measuring with an oscilloscope.
>
> Here are some relevant sections from the AM335x TRM (spruh73o):
>   25.2.2 GPIO Clock and Reset Management
>     Debounce Functional clock (GPIO[123]) comes from CLK_32KHZ.
>   8.1.6.8 Peripheral PLL Description
>     CLK_32KHZ is CLK_24 divided by either 732.4219 or 366.2109.
>     In OPP100 this results in either 32768Hz or 65536Hz.
>     In OPP50 this results in either 16384Hz or 32768Hz.
>   9.3.1.8 clk32kdivratio_ctrl Register
>     Names of the register and field differ from 8.1.6.8, but it's
>      clear they are the same.
>
> I'm not sure if other devices can be similarly cajoled into running
> their equivalent 32KHZ clocks at a different rate, but it certainly
> works for AM335x. Checking OMAP4430 TRM as an example makes it look
> like OMAP44xx has a fixed 32768Hz clock with no adjustment possible
> (backed up by omap44xx-clocks.dtsi having it just be a fixed-clock).
>
>
>>>
>>> Fixes: e85ec6c3047b ("gpio: omap: fix omap2_set_gpio_debounce")
>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.3+
>>> Signed-off-by: David Rivshin <drivshin@allworx.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This logical bug existed before e85ec6c3047b, but if backporting
>>> further it's probably best to just cherry-pick/backport e85ec6c3047b
>>> first.
>>>
>>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 8 +++++---
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>>> index 33ec02d..865a831 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
>>> @@ -205,8 +205,8 @@ static inline void omap_gpio_dbck_disable(struct gpio_bank *bank)
>>>   * @offset: the gpio number on this @bank
>>>   * @debounce: debounce time to use
>>>   *
>>> - * OMAP's debounce time is in 31us steps
>>> - *   <debounce time> = (GPIO_DEBOUNCINGTIME[7:0].DEBOUNCETIME + 1) x 31
>>> + * OMAP's debounce time is in 1/DBCK steps
>>> + *   <debounce time> = (GPIO_DEBOUNCINGTIME[7:0].DEBOUNCETIME + 1) / DBCK
>>>   * so we need to convert and round up to the closest unit.
>>>   *
>>>   * Return: 0 on success, negative error otherwise.
>>> @@ -223,7 +223,9 @@ static int omap2_set_gpio_debounce(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset,
>>>  		return -ENOTSUPP;
>>>
>>>  	if (enable) {
>>> -		debounce = DIV_ROUND_UP(debounce, 31) - 1;
>>> +		u64 tmp = (u64)debounce * clk_get_rate(bank->dbck);
>>> +
>>> +		debounce = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(tmp, 1000000) - 1;
>>>  		if ((debounce & OMAP4_GPIO_DEBOUNCINGTIME_MASK) != debounce)
>>>  			return -EINVAL;
>>>  	}
>>>
>>
>

-- 
regards,
-grygorii

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-18  0:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20170317005704.11971-1-drivshin@awxrd.com>
     [not found] ` <20170317005704.11971-2-drivshin@awxrd.com>
2017-03-17 16:45   ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: omap: return error if requested debounce time is not possible Grygorii Strashko
2017-03-17 17:54     ` David Rivshin
2017-03-17 18:54       ` Grygorii Strashko
2017-03-17 20:50         ` David Rivshin
2017-03-17 21:43           ` Grygorii Strashko
2017-03-17 23:42             ` David Rivshin
2017-04-20 14:44               ` David Rivshin
2017-04-20 15:19                 ` Grygorii Strashko
     [not found] ` <20170317005704.11971-3-drivshin@awxrd.com>
2017-03-17 19:43   ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: omap: compute debounce-time from actual debounce-clock rate Grygorii Strashko
2017-03-17 23:14     ` David Rivshin
2017-03-18  0:06       ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2017-04-20 13:53         ` David Rivshin
2017-03-17  1:48 [PATCH 0/2] gpio: omap: set_debounce fixes David Rivshin
2017-03-17  1:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: omap: compute debounce-time from actual debounce-clock rate David Rivshin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d0fab0d-bc9d-5148-063c-8bfe9e26f9a5@ti.com \
    --to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=drivshin@awxrd.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox