Re: [PATCH 00/10] ASoC: ti: Improve probe error handling

[Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>]

On 7/14/2026 2:00 PM, phucduc.bui@gmail.com wrote:

> The changes fall into two categories:
>   1.Replace dev_err() with dev_err_probe() when reporting probe
>     failures. This preserves the original error code while suppressing
>     unnecessary log messages for deferred probe errors.
>   2.Preserve the original error codes returned by helper functions
>     instead of converting them to -ENODEV, and remove redundant error
>     messages where the helper already reports the failure.

> bui duc phuc (10):
>    ASoC: ti: ams-delta: Use dev_err_probe() for error handling
>    ASoC: ti: davinci-evm: Use dev_err_probe() for error handling
>    ASoC: ti: j721e-evm: Return the original error from card name parsing
>    ASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: Preserve error code and drop redundant log
>    ASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: Use dev_err_probe() for error handling
>    ASoC: ti: omap-dmic: Use dev_err_probe() for error handling
>    ASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: Use dev_err_probe() for error handling
>    ASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: Return the original error code
>    ASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: Use dev_err_probe() for error handling
>    ASoC: ti: rx51: Use dev_err_probe() for error handling
If there are no dependencies between the 1) and 2), have all patches 
belonging to 1) lead the series before any 2)s pop up.

Right now you have three outstanding patches in the middle of the set 
that clearly differentiate from "Use dev_err_probe() for error handling" 
pattern like if you are about to hide something.

Which obviously you do not but the impression is there nonetheless.

Kind regards,
Czarek