[PATCH v2 11/17] mfd: tps65910: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in tps65910_parse_dt()

[PATCH v2 11/17] mfd: tps65910: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in tps65910_parse_dt()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 09:00:59 +0100

Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---

v2:
Lee Jones requested a resend for this patch. The change was rebased
on source files from Linux next-20180308.

 drivers/mfd/tps65910.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
index 8263605f6d2f..555bd394efc3 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
@@ -395,10 +395,8 @@ static struct tps65910_board *tps65910_parse_dt(struct i2c_client *client,
 
 	board_info = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*board_info),
 			GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!board_info) {
-		dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to allocate pdata\n");
+	if (!board_info)
 		return NULL;
-	}
 
 	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,vmbch-threshold", &prop);
 	if (!ret)
-- 
2.16.2

[PATCH v2 12/17 2/4] mfd: tps65910: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in four functions

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 09:06:14 +0100

The local variable "ret" will be set to an appropriate value a bit later.
Thus omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---

v2:
Lee Jones requested a resend for this patch. The change was rebased
on source files from Linux next-20180308.

 drivers/mfd/tps65910.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
index 555bd394efc3..80ea1474c654 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static struct regmap_irq_chip tps65910_irq_chip = {
 static int tps65910_irq_init(struct tps65910 *tps65910, int irq,
 		    struct tps65910_platform_data *pdata)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 	static struct regmap_irq_chip *tps6591x_irqs_chip;
 
 	if (!irq) {
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static int tps65910_sleepinit(struct tps65910 *tps65910,
 		struct tps65910_board *pmic_pdata)
 {
 	struct device *dev = NULL;
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	dev = tps65910->dev;
 
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ static struct tps65910_board *tps65910_parse_dt(struct i2c_client *client,
 	struct tps65910_board *board_info;
 	unsigned int prop;
 	const struct of_device_id *match;
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	match = of_match_device(tps65910_of_match, &client->dev);
 	if (!match) {
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static int tps65910_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 	struct tps65910_board *of_pmic_plat_data = NULL;
 	struct tps65910_platform_data *init_data;
 	unsigned long chip_id = id->driver_data;
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	pmic_plat_data = dev_get_platdata(&i2c->dev);
 
-- 
2.16.2

[PATCH v2 13/17 3/4] mfd: tps65910: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in tps65910_sleepinit()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 09:10:09 +0100

The local variable "dev" will be reassigned by a following statement.
Thus omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---

v2:
Lee Jones requested a resend for this patch. The change was rebased
on source files from Linux next-20180308.

 drivers/mfd/tps65910.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
index 80ea1474c654..7e7d3d1642c6 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int tps65910_ck32k_init(struct tps65910 *tps65910,
 static int tps65910_sleepinit(struct tps65910 *tps65910,
 		struct tps65910_board *pmic_pdata)
 {
-	struct device *dev = NULL;
+	struct device *dev;
 	int ret;
 
 	dev = tps65910->dev;
-- 
2.16.2

[PATCH v2 14/17 4/4] mfd: tps65910: Move an assignment in tps65910_sleepinit()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 09:19:42 +0100

Move the assignment for the local variable "dev" so that its setting
will be performed after a configuration check by this function.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---

v2:
Lee Jones requested a resend for this patch. The change was rebased
on source files from Linux next-20180308.

 drivers/mfd/tps65910.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
index 7e7d3d1642c6..bf16cbe6fd88 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
@@ -315,11 +315,11 @@ static int tps65910_sleepinit(struct tps65910 *tps65910,
 	struct device *dev;
 	int ret;
 
-	dev = tps65910->dev;
-
 	if (!pmic_pdata->en_dev_slp)
 		return 0;
 
+	dev = tps65910->dev;
+
 	/* enabling SLEEP device state */
 	ret = tps65910_reg_set_bits(tps65910, TPS65910_DEVCTRL,
 				DEVCTRL_DEV_SLP_MASK);
-- 
2.16.2

[PATCH v2 16/17] mfd: twl6030-irq: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in twl6030_init_irq()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 09:49:32 +0100

Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---

v2:
Lee Jones requested a resend for this patch. The change was rebased
on source files from Linux next-20180308.

 drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
index e3ec8dfa9f1e..e939431ed10c 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
@@ -392,10 +392,8 @@ int twl6030_init_irq(struct device *dev, int irq_num)
 	nr_irqs = TWL6030_NR_IRQS;
 
 	twl6030_irq = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*twl6030_irq), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!twl6030_irq) {
-		dev_err(dev, "twl6030_irq: Memory allocation failed\n");
+	if (!twl6030_irq)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
 
 	mask[0] = 0xFF;
 	mask[1] = 0xFF;
-- 
2.16.2

Re: [PATCH v2 14/17 4/4] mfd: tps65910: Move an assignment in tps65910_sleepinit()

[Lee Jones]

On Fri, 09 Mar 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 09:19:42 +0100
> 
> Move the assignment for the local variable "dev" so that its setting
> will be performed after a configuration check by this function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> 
> v2:
> Lee Jones requested a resend for this patch. The change was rebased
> on source files from Linux next-20180308.

Thanks.

What happened here: [PATCH v2 14/17 4/4]

How have you managed to insert 4 patches into the x/17 thread?

It shouldn't matter for reviewing purposes.  It just looks really
odd.

>  drivers/mfd/tps65910.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
> index 7e7d3d1642c6..bf16cbe6fd88 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
> @@ -315,11 +315,11 @@ static int tps65910_sleepinit(struct tps65910 *tps65910,
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	dev = tps65910->dev;
> -
>  	if (!pmic_pdata->en_dev_slp)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	dev = tps65910->dev;
> +
>  	/* enabling SLEEP device state */
>  	ret = tps65910_reg_set_bits(tps65910, TPS65910_DEVCTRL,
>  				DEVCTRL_DEV_SLP_MASK);

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [v2 14/17 4/4] mfd: tps65910: Checking patch structures

[SF Markus Elfring]

> How have you managed to insert 4 patches into the x/17 thread?

I dared to group the desired patch series into dedicated mail threads.

Regards,
Markus

Re: [v2 14/17 4/4] mfd: tps65910: Checking patch structures

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> > How have you managed to insert 4 patches into the x/17 thread?
> 
> I dared to group the desired patch series into dedicated mail threads.

Interesting.  I've never seen that done before.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog