Linux PARISC architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
To: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: [parisc-linux] [PATCH-linux-2.5] sa_handler compare with cast
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 08:12:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030508061234.GR27494@lug-owl.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EB7766A000003EE@ocpmta7.freegates.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8028 bytes --]

On Tue, 2003-05-06 19:56:48 +0200, Joel Soete <jsoe0708@tiscali.be>
wrote in message <3EB7766A000003EE@ocpmta7.freegates.net>:
> So it will finaly become:
> diff -NaurX dontdiff linux-2.4.20-pa33/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c linux-2.4.20-pa33-gcc33/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c
> --- linux-2.4.20-pa33/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c	2003-05-06 17:47:32.000000000
> +0200
> +++ linux-2.4.20-pa33-gcc33/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c	2003-05-06 18:09:35.000000000
> +0200
[...]

This is the 2.5.x version. It's _only_ the sa_handler caste, not
including the additional compiler fixes you suggested.


Index: drivers/char/n_tty.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/linux-2.5/drivers/char/n_tty.c,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.8 n_tty.c
--- drivers/char/n_tty.c	5 May 2003 17:06:33 -0000	1.8
+++ drivers/char/n_tty.c	8 May 2003 06:08:38 -0000
@@ -808,7 +808,8 @@
 int is_ignored(int sig)
 {
 	return (sigismember(&current->blocked, sig) ||
-	        current->sighand->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN);
+	        current->sighand->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler
+				== (void *)SIG_IGN);
 }
 
 static void n_tty_set_termios(struct tty_struct *tty, struct termios * old)
Index: fs/ncpfs/sock.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/linux-2.5/fs/ncpfs/sock.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 sock.c
--- fs/ncpfs/sock.c	15 Feb 2003 03:48:26 -0000	1.6
+++ fs/ncpfs/sock.c	8 May 2003 06:08:39 -0000
@@ -757,9 +757,9 @@
 			   What if we've blocked it ourselves?  What about
 			   alarms?  Why, in fact, are we mucking with the
 			   sigmask at all? -- r~ */
-			if (current->sighand->action[SIGINT - 1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL)
+			if (current->sighand->action[SIGINT - 1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL)
 				mask |= sigmask(SIGINT);
-			if (current->sighand->action[SIGQUIT - 1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL)
+			if (current->sighand->action[SIGQUIT - 1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL)
 				mask |= sigmask(SIGQUIT);
 		}
 		siginitsetinv(&current->blocked, mask);
Index: fs/proc/array.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/linux-2.5/fs/proc/array.c,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.15 array.c
--- fs/proc/array.c	5 May 2003 17:08:54 -0000	1.15
+++ fs/proc/array.c	8 May 2003 06:08:40 -0000
@@ -213,9 +213,9 @@
 
 	k = p->sighand->action;
 	for (i = 1; i <= _NSIG; ++i, ++k) {
-		if (k->sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN)
+		if (k->sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN)
 			sigaddset(ign, i);
-		else if (k->sa.sa_handler != SIG_DFL)
+		else if (k->sa.sa_handler != (void *)SIG_DFL)
 			sigaddset(catch, i);
 	}
 }
Index: kernel/signal.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/linux-2.5/kernel/signal.c,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.19 signal.c
--- kernel/signal.c	24 Apr 2003 01:38:05 -0000	1.19
+++ kernel/signal.c	8 May 2003 06:08:42 -0000
@@ -144,12 +144,12 @@
 		(((sig) < SIGRTMIN)  && T(sig, SIG_KERNEL_STOP_MASK))
 
 #define sig_user_defined(t, signr) \
-	(((t)->sighand->action[(signr)-1].sa.sa_handler != SIG_DFL) &&	\
-	 ((t)->sighand->action[(signr)-1].sa.sa_handler != SIG_IGN))
+	(((t)->sighand->action[(signr)-1].sa.sa_handler != (void *)SIG_DFL) &&	\
+	 ((t)->sighand->action[(signr)-1].sa.sa_handler != (void *)SIG_IGN))
 
 #define sig_fatal(t, signr) \
 	(!T(signr, SIG_KERNEL_IGNORE_MASK|SIG_KERNEL_STOP_MASK) && \
-	 (t)->sighand->action[(signr)-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL)
+	 (t)->sighand->action[(signr)-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL)
 
 static inline int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
 {
@@ -171,8 +171,8 @@
 
 	/* Is it explicitly or implicitly ignored? */
 	handler = t->sighand->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler;
-	return   handler == SIG_IGN ||
-		(handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
+	return   handler == (void *)SIG_IGN ||
+		(handler == (void *)SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@
 	int i;
 	struct k_sigaction *ka = &t->sighand->action[0];
 	for (i = _NSIG ; i != 0 ; i--) {
-		if (force_default || ka->sa.sa_handler != SIG_IGN)
+		if (force_default || ka->sa.sa_handler != (void *)SIG_IGN)
 			ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
 		ka->sa.sa_flags = 0;
 		sigemptyset(&ka->sa.sa_mask);
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@
 	int ret;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&t->sighand->siglock, flags);
-	if (t->sighand->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN)
+	if (t->sighand->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN)
 		t->sighand->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
 	sigdelset(&t->blocked, sig);
 	recalc_sigpending_tsk(t);
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@
 	unsigned long int flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&t->sighand->siglock, flags);
-	if (t->sighand->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN)
+	if (t->sighand->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN)
 		t->sighand->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
 	sigdelset(&t->blocked, sig);
 	recalc_sigpending_tsk(t);
@@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@
 	psig = tsk->parent->sighand;
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&psig->siglock, flags);
 	if (sig == SIGCHLD && tsk->state != TASK_STOPPED &&
-	    (psig->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN ||
+	    (psig->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN ||
 	     (psig->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_flags & SA_NOCLDWAIT))) {
 		/*
 		 * We are exiting and our parent doesn't care.  POSIX.1
@@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@
 		 * it, just use SIG_IGN instead).
 		 */
 		tsk->exit_signal = -1;
-		if (psig->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN)
+		if (psig->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN)
 			sig = 0;
 	}
 	if (sig > 0 && sig <= _NSIG)
@@ -1347,7 +1347,7 @@
 
 	sighand = parent->sighand;
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sighand->siglock, flags);
-	if (sighand->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler != SIG_IGN &&
+	if (sighand->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler != (void *)SIG_IGN &&
 	    !(sighand->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_flags & SA_NOCLDSTOP))
 		__group_send_sig_info(SIGCHLD, &info, parent);
 	/*
@@ -1581,9 +1581,9 @@
 		}
 
 		ka = &current->sighand->action[signr-1];
-		if (ka->sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN) /* Do nothing.  */
+		if (ka->sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN) /* Do nothing.  */
 			continue;
-		if (ka->sa.sa_handler != SIG_DFL) /* Run the handler.  */
+		if (ka->sa.sa_handler != (void *)SIG_DFL) /* Run the handler.  */
 			return signr;
 
 		/*
@@ -2034,8 +2034,8 @@
 		 *   (for example, SIGCHLD), shall cause the pending signal to
 		 *   be discarded, whether or not it is blocked"
 		 */
-		if (act->sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN ||
-		    (act->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL &&
+		if (act->sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_IGN ||
+		    (act->sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL &&
 		     sig_kernel_ignore(sig))) {
 			/*
 			 * This is a fairly rare case, so we only take the
Index: net/sunrpc/clnt.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/linux-2.5/net/sunrpc/clnt.c,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.12 clnt.c
--- net/sunrpc/clnt.c	8 Apr 2003 15:21:04 -0000	1.12
+++ net/sunrpc/clnt.c	8 May 2003 06:08:44 -0000
@@ -255,9 +255,9 @@
 	/* Turn off various signals */
 	if (clnt->cl_intr) {
 		struct k_sigaction *action = current->sighand->action;
-		if (action[SIGINT-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL)
+		if (action[SIGINT-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL)
 			sigallow |= sigmask(SIGINT);
-		if (action[SIGQUIT-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL)
+		if (action[SIGQUIT-1].sa.sa_handler == (void *)SIG_DFL)
 			sigallow |= sigmask(SIGQUIT);
 	}
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&current->sighand->siglock, irqflags);



MfG, JBG

-- 
   Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481
   "Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
    fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!
      ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(IRAQ_WAR_2 | DRM | TCPA));

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-05-08  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-05 20:02 [parisc-linux] Oops on 2.4.20-pa33 Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-05 20:05 ` Randolph Chung
2003-05-05 21:05   ` [parisc-linux] [PATCH-2.4] DIVA serial build error (was: Oops on 2.4.20-pa33) Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-06 15:20     ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-07 16:27       ` Paul Bame
2003-05-06  6:04   ` [parisc-linux] Oops on 2.4.20-pa33 Joel Soete
2003-05-06 14:04     ` Randolph Chung
2003-05-06 15:04       ` Joel Soete
2003-05-06 15:08         ` Randolph Chung
2003-05-06 16:34         ` Joel Soete
2003-05-06 16:42           ` John David Anglin
2003-05-06 17:56             ` Joel Soete
2003-05-07 15:48               ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-07 16:09                 ` Joel Soete
2003-05-07 17:17                   ` Randolph Chung
2003-05-07 17:51                     ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-09  2:37                       ` Andrew Shugg
2003-05-09 22:04                         ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-08  5:52                     ` Joel Soete
2003-05-08  6:12               ` Jan-Benedict Glaw [this message]
2003-05-10 20:31             ` [parisc-linux] Yet another '__canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare' pb Joel Soete
2003-05-10 20:25               ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-10 21:08               ` Grant Grundler
2003-05-10 21:32                 ` John David Anglin
2003-05-10 21:33                 ` Joel Soete
2003-05-10 21:38                   ` [parisc-linux] Yet another '__canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare' John David Anglin
2003-05-10 21:21               ` [parisc-linux] Re: Yet another '__canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare' pb John David Anglin
2003-05-05 20:10 ` [parisc-linux] Oops on 2.4.20-pa33 John David Anglin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030508061234.GR27494@lug-owl.de \
    --to=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
    --cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox