From: Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
To: Joel Soete <jsoe0708@tiscali.be>
Cc: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>,
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Oops on 2.4.20-pa33
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 08:08:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030506150827.GA23465@tausq.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EB7766A00000308@ocpmta7.freegates.net>
> That is ok for me (even if I don't understand very well :( ; afaik the previous
> code works fine for gcc<=3.1 and do not seems to concern 64bits? )
The point is that if the new code is always correct, then littering
the code with #ifdef's makes the code hard to read and maintain. If
you really need to make the code different for the two cases, it's
better to conditionally define a function/macro in a single place
(header file) and use that in the source, rather than having ifdef's
in many places.
HTH,
randolph
--
Randolph Chung
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports
http://www.tausq.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-06 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-05 20:02 [parisc-linux] Oops on 2.4.20-pa33 Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-05 20:05 ` Randolph Chung
2003-05-05 21:05 ` [parisc-linux] [PATCH-2.4] DIVA serial build error (was: Oops on 2.4.20-pa33) Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-06 15:20 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-07 16:27 ` Paul Bame
2003-05-06 6:04 ` [parisc-linux] Oops on 2.4.20-pa33 Joel Soete
2003-05-06 14:04 ` Randolph Chung
2003-05-06 15:04 ` Joel Soete
2003-05-06 15:08 ` Randolph Chung [this message]
2003-05-06 16:34 ` Joel Soete
2003-05-06 16:42 ` John David Anglin
2003-05-06 17:56 ` Joel Soete
2003-05-07 15:48 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-07 16:09 ` Joel Soete
2003-05-07 17:17 ` Randolph Chung
2003-05-07 17:51 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-09 2:37 ` Andrew Shugg
2003-05-09 22:04 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-08 5:52 ` Joel Soete
2003-05-08 6:12 ` [parisc-linux] [PATCH-linux-2.5] sa_handler compare with cast Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-10 20:31 ` [parisc-linux] Yet another '__canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare' pb Joel Soete
2003-05-10 20:25 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-05-10 21:08 ` Grant Grundler
2003-05-10 21:32 ` John David Anglin
2003-05-10 21:33 ` Joel Soete
2003-05-10 21:38 ` [parisc-linux] Yet another '__canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare' John David Anglin
2003-05-10 21:21 ` [parisc-linux] Re: Yet another '__canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare' pb John David Anglin
2003-05-05 20:10 ` [parisc-linux] Oops on 2.4.20-pa33 John David Anglin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-06 17:33 Joel Soete
2003-05-06 17:40 ` Randolph Chung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030506150827.GA23465@tausq.org \
--to=tausq@debian.org \
--cc=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
--cc=jsoe0708@tiscali.be \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox