From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@intel.com>, markgross@kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, ashok.raj@intel.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, thiago.macieira@intel.com,
athenas.jimenez.gonzalez@intel.com, sohil.mehta@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add current_batch sysfs entry
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 22:22:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6acf1f9-5441-d7b8-0eb4-3913f6f3392e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221107225323.2733518-13-jithu.joseph@intel.com>
Hi,
On 11/7/22 23:53, Jithu Joseph wrote:
> Initial implementation assumed a single IFS test image file with a
> fixed name ff-mm-ss.scan. (where ff, mm, ss refers to family, model
> and stepping of the core)
>
> Subsequently, it became evident that supporting more than one
> test image file is needed to provide more comprehensive
> test coverage. (Test coverage in this scenario refers to testing
> more transistors in the core to identify faults)
>
> The other alternative of increasing the size of a single scan test image
> file would not work as the upper bound is limited by the size of memory
> area reserved by BIOS for loading IFS test image.
>
> Introduce "current_batch" file which accepts a number. Writing a
> number to the current_batch file would load the test image file by name
> ff-mm-ss-<xy>.scan, where <xy> is the number written to the
> "current_batch" file in hex. Range check of the input is done to verify
> it not greater than 0xff.
>
> For e.g if the scan test image comprises of 6 files, they would be named
> as show below:
> 06-8f-06-01.scan
> 06-8f-06-02.scan
> 06-8f-06-03.scan
> 06-8f-06-04.scan
> 06-8f-06-05.scan
> 06-8f-06-06.scan
>
> And writing 3 to current_batch would result in loading 06-8f-06-03.scan
> in the above e.g. The file can also be read to know the currently loaded
> file.
>
> And testing a system looks like:
> for each scan file
> do
> load the IFS test image file (write to the batch file)
> for each core
> do
> test the core with this set of tests
> done
> done
>
> Qualify few error messages with the test image file suffix to
> provide better context.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@intel.com>
Thanks, patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/ifs.h | 23 ++++++++++----
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/core.c | 1 +
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/load.c | 18 +++++++----
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c | 10 ++++---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/sysfs.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/ifs.h b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/ifs.h
> index 98ca91bdd5ca..390e508faf57 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/ifs.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/ifs.h
> @@ -33,13 +33,23 @@
> * The driver loads the tests into memory reserved BIOS local to each CPU
> * socket in a two step process using writes to MSRs to first load the
> * SHA hashes for the test. Then the tests themselves. Status MSRs provide
> - * feedback on the success/failure of these steps. When a new test file
> - * is installed it can be loaded by writing to the driver reload file::
> + * feedback on the success/failure of these steps.
> *
> - * # echo 1 > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/intel_ifs_0/reload
> + * The test files are kept in a fixed location: /lib/firmware/intel/ifs_0/
> + * For e.g if there are 3 test files, they would be named in the following
> + * fashion:
> + * ff-mm-ss-01.scan
> + * ff-mm-ss-02.scan
> + * ff-mm-ss-03.scan
> + * (where ff refers to family, mm indicates model and ss indicates stepping)
> *
> - * Similar to microcode, the current version of the scan tests is stored
> - * in a fixed location: /lib/firmware/intel/ifs.0/family-model-stepping.scan
> + * A different testfile can be loaded by writing the numerical portion
> + * (e.g 1, 2 or 3 in the above scenario) into the curent_batch file.
> + * To load ff-mm-ss-02.scan, the following command can be used::
> + *
> + * # echo 2 > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/intel_ifs_0/current_batch
> + *
> + * The above file can also be read to know the currently loaded image.
> *
> * Running tests
> * -------------
> @@ -207,6 +217,7 @@ struct ifs_data {
> int status;
> u64 scan_details;
> int cur_batch;
> + int test_num;
> };
>
> struct ifs_work {
> @@ -227,7 +238,7 @@ static inline struct ifs_data *ifs_get_data(struct device *dev)
> return &d->data;
> }
>
> -void ifs_load_firmware(struct device *dev);
> +int ifs_load_firmware(struct device *dev);
> int do_core_test(int cpu, struct device *dev);
> const struct attribute_group **ifs_get_groups(void);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/core.c
> index 5fb7f655c291..1f040837e8eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/core.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, ifs_cpu_ids);
> static struct ifs_device ifs_device = {
> .data = {
> .integrity_cap_bit = MSR_INTEGRITY_CAPS_PERIODIC_BIST_BIT,
> + .test_num = 0,
> },
> .misc = {
> .name = "intel_ifs_0",
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/load.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/load.c
> index f361fd42a320..c6414958a691 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/load.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/load.c
> @@ -256,17 +256,18 @@ static int ifs_image_sanity_check(struct device *dev, const struct microcode_hea
>
> /*
> * Load ifs image. Before loading ifs module, the ifs image must be located
> - * in /lib/firmware/intel/ifs and named as {family/model/stepping}.{testname}.
> + * in /lib/firmware/intel/ifs_x/ and named as family-model-stepping-02x.{testname}.
> */
> -void ifs_load_firmware(struct device *dev)
> +int ifs_load_firmware(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct ifs_data *ifsd = ifs_get_data(dev);
> const struct firmware *fw;
> - char scan_path[32];
> - int ret;
> + char scan_path[64];
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> - snprintf(scan_path, sizeof(scan_path), "intel/ifs/%02x-%02x-%02x.scan",
> - boot_cpu_data.x86, boot_cpu_data.x86_model, boot_cpu_data.x86_stepping);
> + snprintf(scan_path, sizeof(scan_path), "intel/ifs_%d/%02x-%02x-%02x-%02x.scan",
> + ifsd->test_num, boot_cpu_data.x86, boot_cpu_data.x86_model,
> + boot_cpu_data.x86_stepping, ifsd->cur_batch);
>
> ret = request_firmware_direct(&fw, scan_path, dev);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -282,8 +283,13 @@ void ifs_load_firmware(struct device *dev)
> ifs_hash_ptr = (u64)(ifs_header_ptr + 1);
>
> ret = scan_chunks_sanity_check(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(dev, "Load failure for batch: %02x\n", ifsd->cur_batch);
> +
> release:
> release_firmware(fw);
> done:
> ifsd->loaded = (ret == 0);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c
> index b2ca2bb4501f..0bfd8fcdd7e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c
> @@ -78,14 +78,16 @@ static void message_not_tested(struct device *dev, int cpu, union ifs_status sta
>
> static void message_fail(struct device *dev, int cpu, union ifs_status status)
> {
> + struct ifs_data *ifsd = ifs_get_data(dev);
> +
> /*
> * control_error is set when the microcode runs into a problem
> * loading the image from the reserved BIOS memory, or it has
> * been corrupted. Reloading the image may fix this issue.
> */
> if (status.control_error) {
> - dev_err(dev, "CPU(s) %*pbl: could not execute from loaded scan image\n",
> - cpumask_pr_args(cpu_smt_mask(cpu)));
> + dev_err(dev, "CPU(s) %*pbl: could not execute from loaded scan image. Batch: %02x version: 0x%x\n",
> + cpumask_pr_args(cpu_smt_mask(cpu)), ifsd->cur_batch, ifsd->loaded_version);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -96,8 +98,8 @@ static void message_fail(struct device *dev, int cpu, union ifs_status status)
> * the core being tested.
> */
> if (status.signature_error) {
> - dev_err(dev, "CPU(s) %*pbl: test signature incorrect.\n",
> - cpumask_pr_args(cpu_smt_mask(cpu)));
> + dev_err(dev, "CPU(s) %*pbl: test signature incorrect. Batch: %02x version: 0x%x\n",
> + cpumask_pr_args(cpu_smt_mask(cpu)), ifsd->cur_batch, ifsd->loaded_version);
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/sysfs.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/sysfs.c
> index e077910c5d28..d2eeeb04d760 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/sysfs.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,43 @@ static ssize_t run_test_store(struct device *dev,
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(run_test);
>
> +static ssize_t current_batch_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct ifs_data *ifsd = ifs_get_data(dev);
> + int cur_batch;
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = kstrtouint(buf, 0, &cur_batch);
> + if (rc < 0 || cur_batch > 0xff)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (down_interruptible(&ifs_sem))
> + return -EINTR;
> +
> + ifsd->cur_batch = cur_batch;
> +
> + rc = ifs_load_firmware(dev);
> +
> + up(&ifs_sem);
> +
> + return (rc == 0) ? count : rc;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t current_batch_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct ifs_data *ifsd = ifs_get_data(dev);
> +
> + if (!ifsd->loaded)
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "none\n");
> + else
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%02x\n", ifsd->cur_batch);
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(current_batch);
> +
> /*
> * Display currently loaded IFS image version.
> */
> @@ -108,6 +145,7 @@ static struct attribute *plat_ifs_attrs[] = {
> &dev_attr_details.attr,
> &dev_attr_status.attr,
> &dev_attr_run_test.attr,
> + &dev_attr_current_batch.attr,
> &dev_attr_image_version.attr,
> NULL
> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-10 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 177+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-21 20:33 [PATCH 00/14] IFS multi test image support and misc changes Jithu Joseph
2022-10-21 20:34 ` [PATCH 01/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove unused selection Jithu Joseph
2022-10-21 20:34 ` [PATCH 02/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Propagate load failure error code Jithu Joseph
2022-10-24 22:52 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-10-24 23:17 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-10-21 20:34 ` [PATCH 03/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: return a more appropriate Error code Jithu Joseph
2022-10-24 22:57 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-10-24 23:01 ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-21 20:34 ` [PATCH 04/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove image loading during init Jithu Joseph
2022-10-24 23:50 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-10-25 0:41 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-10-25 6:06 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-10-26 23:53 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-01 7:00 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-10-21 20:34 ` [PATCH 05/14] x86/microcode/intel: Expose find_matching_signature() for IFS Jithu Joseph
2022-11-02 19:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-02 21:32 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-10-21 20:34 ` [PATCH 06/14] x86/microcode/intel: Use appropriate type in microcode_sanity_check() Jithu Joseph
2022-10-21 20:34 ` [PATCH 07/14] x86/microcode/intel: Expose microcode_sanity_check() Jithu Joseph
2022-11-01 7:28 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-01 19:06 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-03 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-03 19:25 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 23:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-04 6:15 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-04 10:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-04 22:02 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-04 22:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-21 20:34 ` [PATCH 08/14] x86/microcode/intel: Meta-data support in microcode file Jithu Joseph
2022-11-01 8:51 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-01 18:05 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-03 11:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-21 20:34 ` [PATCH 09/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Use generic microcode headers and functions Jithu Joseph
2022-11-01 18:37 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-01 21:07 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-10-21 20:34 ` [PATCH 10/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add metadata validation Jithu Joseph
2022-11-01 20:28 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-09 23:10 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-10-21 20:34 ` [PATCH 11/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove reload sysfs entry Jithu Joseph
2022-10-21 20:34 ` [PATCH 12/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add current_batch " Jithu Joseph
2022-11-01 22:26 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-01 23:27 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-03 8:03 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-10-21 20:34 ` [PATCH 13/14] Documentation/ABI: Update IFS ABI doc Jithu Joseph
2022-11-01 22:34 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-01 22:48 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-01 22:59 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-02 22:10 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-03 7:49 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-10-21 20:34 ` [PATCH 14/14] Revert "platform/x86/intel/ifs: Mark as BROKEN" Jithu Joseph
2022-11-03 8:21 ` [PATCH 00/14] IFS multi test image support and misc changes Sohil Mehta
2022-11-07 9:24 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-07 23:01 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 " Jithu Joseph
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove unused selection Jithu Joseph
2022-11-09 1:52 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-10 21:03 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: return a more appropriate Error code Jithu Joseph
2022-11-09 1:57 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-10 21:04 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove image loading during init Jithu Joseph
2022-11-09 1:59 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-10 21:06 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] x86/microcode/intel: Expose find_matching_signature() for IFS Jithu Joseph
2022-11-09 2:06 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-11 13:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] x86/microcode/intel: Use appropriate type in microcode_sanity_check() Jithu Joseph
2022-11-09 2:47 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-11 13:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] x86/microcode/intel: Expose microcode_sanity_check() Jithu Joseph
2022-11-09 3:03 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-09 3:29 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-11 14:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-11 21:39 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] x86/microcode/intel: Use a reserved field for metasize Jithu Joseph
2022-11-09 3:06 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-11 14:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add metadata support Jithu Joseph
2022-11-09 3:25 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-10 21:08 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-11 16:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Use generic microcode headers and functions Jithu Joseph
2022-11-09 3:29 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-10 21:11 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-11 16:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-11 20:41 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-16 17:26 ` Tony Luck
2022-11-16 18:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-16 19:02 ` Luck, Tony
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add metadata validation Jithu Joseph
2022-11-09 23:15 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-10 1:22 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-10 9:40 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-10 21:18 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-11 18:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-11 18:48 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-11 20:30 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-11 21:29 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove reload sysfs entry Jithu Joseph
2022-11-09 23:16 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-10 21:19 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add current_batch " Jithu Joseph
2022-11-09 23:46 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-10 21:22 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2022-11-12 16:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-12 18:21 ` Thiago Macieira
2022-11-12 19:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-12 19:58 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-13 2:06 ` Thiago Macieira
2022-11-12 18:33 ` Luck, Tony
2022-11-12 19:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-12 23:32 ` Luck, Tony
2022-11-13 2:35 ` Thiago Macieira
2022-11-13 7:37 ` gregkh
2022-11-13 11:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-13 15:15 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-13 15:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-13 17:01 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-13 18:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-13 21:40 ` Thiago Macieira
2022-11-13 22:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-14 18:13 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-14 18:25 ` Luck, Tony
2022-11-14 19:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-14 19:07 ` Luck, Tony
2022-11-14 19:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-14 19:38 ` Luck, Tony
2022-11-14 19:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-13 16:41 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-13 16:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-13 17:55 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-13 18:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-13 21:33 ` Tony Luck
2022-11-13 22:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-13 21:21 ` Thiago Macieira
2022-11-13 22:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-13 21:51 ` Thiago Macieira
2022-11-13 23:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-14 8:28 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-14 7:15 ` gregkh
2022-11-14 15:33 ` Tony Luck
2022-11-14 15:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] Documentation/ABI: Update IFS ABI doc Jithu Joseph
2022-11-09 23:55 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-10 1:16 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-10 21:33 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] Revert "platform/x86/intel/ifs: Mark as BROKEN" Jithu Joseph
2022-11-09 23:57 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-11-10 21:34 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-10 9:59 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] IFS multi test image support and misc changes Borislav Petkov
2022-11-10 21:37 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-10 21:58 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 00/16] " Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove unused selection Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Return a more appropriate Error code Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove image loading during init Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove memory allocation from load path Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 8:51 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-17 17:29 ` Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 18:01 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-17 19:59 ` Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 21:13 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-17 22:44 ` Joseph, Jithu
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] x86/microcode/intel: Reuse find_matching_signature() Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] x86/microcode/intel: Use appropriate type in microcode_sanity_check() Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] x86/microcode/intel: Reuse microcode_sanity_check() Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] x86/microcode/intel: Add hdr_type to intel_microcode_sanity_check() Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] x86/microcode/intel: Use a reserved field for metasize Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add metadata support Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Use generic microcode headers and functions Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 22:50 ` Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add metadata validation Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 23:04 ` Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove reload sysfs entry Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add current_batch " Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] Documentation/ABI: Update IFS ABI doc Jithu Joseph
2022-11-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] Revert "platform/x86/intel/ifs: Mark as BROKEN" Jithu Joseph
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6acf1f9-5441-d7b8-0eb4-3913f6f3392e@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=athenas.jimenez.gonzalez@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jithu.joseph@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thiago.macieira@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox