From: Junjie Cao <junjie.cao@intel.com>
To: Shrihari E S <shrihari.s@samsung.com>
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, fan.ni@samsung.com, mst@redhat.com,
marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
arun.george@samsung.com, dongjoo.seo1@samsung.com,
s.neeraj@samsung.com, vikash.k5@samsung.com, cpgs@samsung.com,
gost.dev@samsung.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 09/10] hw/cxl: Wire SVC and Dev3 capability to CXL Type 3 device
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 15:23:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830072305.399573-1-junjie.cao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437941060.21787732282637.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2new>
Hi Shrihari,
On Wed, 26 Aug 2026 11:04:09 +0530, Shrihari E S wrote:
> + if (ct3d->svc) {
> + /* SVC capability of the type3 device */
> + rc = pcie_svc_cap_init(pci_dev, 0x200 + PCI_ERR_SIZEOF, errp);
> + if ((rc >= 0) && ct3d->flitmode && ct3d->uio_comp_capable) {
The cover letter says x-uio depends on x-svc and x-256b-flit, but this
only gates the config space capabilities. ct3d_reset() passes
ct3d->uio_comp_capable straight to cxl_component_register_init_common(),
so those dependencies don't reach the component registers. I checked:
a type3 with x-uio=on and neither x-svc nor x-256b-flit boots silently
and its HDM Decoder Capability reads 0x00043b12 -- UIO set, UIO
decoder count filled -- with no SVC or Dev3 capability in config
space, and hdm_decoder_commit() will then latch ct3d->uio_enabled from
the guest write. Failing realize ("x-uio requires x-svc and
x-256b-flit") would keep the device consistent; alternatively deriving
one uio gate at realize and using it for both the capabilities and the
register init would do the same.
It's asymmetric the other way as well: there's no x-uio on the ports,
and x-256b-flit defaults to on for a cxl-rp, so x-svc=on alone is
enough -- a cxl-rp with just x-svc=on reads 0x00042312 -- while the
type3 has to spell it out. That assumes root ports keep the bit at
all; see my note on 5/10.
Related: ct3d->uio_enabled, the dev->exp.svc flags and the two
pcie_dev3_*_enabled() helpers are written but never read anywhere in
the series. Same as on 3/10, I'd land them with the code that consumes
them -- here that's the data-plane series.
With the full docs topology (patch 10's example) the layout itself
looks good: on the type3 device SVC lands at 0x248 behind AER and Dev3
at 0x2bc, chain intact, and Dev3 advertises UIO/14-bit-tag completer
with Segment Captured tracking flit mode.
Many thanks,
Junjie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20260826052014epcas5p11846c6a40fcec4ec4ba441ceb26e5dcc@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
[not found] ` <20260826053410.1322176-1-shrihari.s@samsung.com>
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 01/10] hw/pci: Refactor flitmode from PCIESlot to PCIEPort Shrihari E S
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 02/10] hw/pci: Move 'x-256b-flit' property from cxl_root_port to pcie_root_port Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:20 ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 03/10] hw/pci: Add SVC capability and UIO properties to PCIe ports Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:20 ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 04/10] hw/cxl: Add Streamlined Virtual Channel (SVC) property to CXL ports Shrihari E S
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 05/10] hw/cxl: Wire UIO capability into HDM decoder and DVSEC registers Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:21 ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 06/10] hw/pci: Add PCIe Streamlined Virtual Channel (SVC) capability Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:21 ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 07/10] hw/pci: hw/cxl: Wire SVC initialization into port realize functions Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:22 ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 08/10] hw/pci: Add PCIe Device3 capability support Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:22 ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 09/10] hw/cxl: Wire SVC and Dev3 capability to CXL Type 3 device Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:23 ` Junjie Cao [this message]
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 10/10] cxl: Add documentation for CXL UIO support Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:23 ` Junjie Cao
[not found] <CGME20260826051958epcas5p3db6cf2ef9115168c5d8dcec7bdb9b8c3@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 0/9] hw/pci: hw/cxl: Add UIO support in CXL and PCIe stack Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:19 ` Junjie Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830072305.399573-1-junjie.cao@intel.com \
--to=junjie.cao@intel.com \
--cc=arun.george@samsung.com \
--cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dongjoo.seo1@samsung.com \
--cc=fan.ni@samsung.com \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=s.neeraj@samsung.com \
--cc=shrihari.s@samsung.com \
--cc=vikash.k5@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox