From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Philipp Stanner" <pstanner@redhat.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Uladzislau Koshchanka" <koshchanka@gmail.com>,
"Neil Brown" <neilb@suse.de>,
"Niklas Schnelle" <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
"John Sanpe" <sanpeqf@gmail.com>,
"Kent Overstreet" <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
"Yury Norov" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
"wuqiang.matt" <wuqiang.matt@bytedance.com>,
"Jason Baron" <jbaron@akamai.com>,
"Kefeng Wang" <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
"Ben Dooks" <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] lib, pci: unify generic pci_iounmap()
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 22:59:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3627579b-66dd-42aa-92ab-3d561cdfb2f8@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c902e7e690dcdf57c2e8402e083d27ce84aee21b.camel@redhat.com>
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, at 22:56, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 22:32 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, at 20:37, Philipp Stanner wrote:
>> The best I can think of is to move the lib/iomap.c version
>> of iomem_is_ioport() to include/asm-generic/iomap.h with
>> an #ifndef iomem_is_ioport / #define iomem_is_ioport
>> check around it. This file is only included on parisc, alpha,
>> sh and when CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP is set.
>
> My implementation from lib/iomap.c basically just throws away the
> IO_COND macro and does the checks manually:
>
> #if defined(ARCH_WANTS_GENERIC_IOMEM_IS_IOPORT)
> bool iomem_is_ioport(void __iomem *addr)
> {
> unsigned long port = (unsigned long __force)addr;
>
> if (port > PIO_OFFSET && port < PIO_RESERVED)
> return true;
>
> return false;
> }
> #endif /* ARCH_WANTS_GENERIC_IOMEM_IS_IOPORT */
>
> So we'd also need PIO_OFFSET and PIO_RESERVED, which are not present in
> asm-generic/iomap.h.
>
> Sure, we could move them there or into a common header. But I'm not
> sure if that is wise, meaning: is it really better than the ugly
> WANTS_GENERIC_IOMEM... macro?
>
> Our entire goal in this series is, after all, to simplify the
> implementation.
Right, in that case it's probably better to leave it in lib/iomap.c,
just keep the ARCH_WANTS_GENERIC_IOMEM_IS_IOPORT definition
in include/asm-generic/iomap.h as well then and keep it out of
the normal asm-generic/io.h path.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-01 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-01 12:16 [PATCH v2 0/4] Regather scattered PCI-Code Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] lib: move pci_iomap.c to drivers/pci/ Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 14:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 18:56 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 22:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] lib: move pci-specific devres code " Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 14:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 19:00 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 22:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] pci: move devres code from pci.c to devres.c Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] lib, pci: unify generic pci_iounmap() Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 19:37 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 21:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 21:56 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 21:59 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2023-12-01 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Regather scattered PCI-Code Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 19:09 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 22:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3627579b-66dd-42aa-92ab-3d561cdfb2f8@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=koshchanka@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=pstanner@redhat.com \
--cc=sanpeqf@gmail.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wuqiang.matt@bytedance.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox