Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Uladzislau Koshchanka <koshchanka@gmail.com>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
	John Sanpe <sanpeqf@gmail.com>,
	 Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	"wuqiang.matt" <wuqiang.matt@bytedance.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	pstanner@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Regather scattered PCI-Code
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 20:09:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65079f6d5f512f9aff003bdfea127b214a9f9290.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3871b83a-0e80-402e-bbe6-359c17127842@app.fastmail.com>

On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 17:27 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, at 13:16, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > 
> > Arnd has suggested that architectures defining a custom inb() need
> > their
> > own iomem_is_ioport(), as well. I've grepped for inb() and found
> > the
> > following list of archs that define their own:
> >   - alpha
> >   - arm
> >   - m68k <--
> >   - parisc
> >   - powerpc
> >   - sh
> >   - sparc
> >   - x86 <--
> > 
> > All of those have their own definitons of pci_iounmap(). Therefore,
> > they
> > don't need our generic version in the first place and, thus, also
> > need
> > no iomem_is_ioport().
> 
> What I meant of course is that they should define iomem_is_ioport()
> in order to drop the custom pci_iounmap() and have only one remaining
> definition of that function left.

Ah, gotcha!
Yes, that would be neat. Would also allow for droping
ARCH_WANTS_GENERIC_PCI_IOUNMAP.

> 
> The one special case that I missed the last time is s390, which
> does not use GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP and will just require a separate
> copy of pci_iounmap() to go along with the is custom pci_iomap().
> 
> > The two exceptions are x86 and m68k. The former uses lib/iomap.c
> > through
> > CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP, as Arnd pointed out in the previous
> > discussion
> > (thus, CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP is not really generic in this regard).
> > 
> > So as I see it, only m68k WOULD need its own custom definition of
> > iomem_is_ioport(). But as I understand it it doesn't because it
> > uses the
> > one from asm-generic/pci_iomap.h ??
> 
> At the moment, m68k gets the pci_iounmap() from lib/iomap.c
> if PCI is enabled for coldfire, but that incorrectly calls
> iounmap() on PCI_IO_PA if it gets passed a PIO address.
> 
> The version from asm-generic/io.h should fix this.

So, to be sure: m68k will use the generic iomem_is_ioport() despite
defining its own inb()?

> 
> For classic m68k, there is no PCI, so nothing calls pci_iounmap().
> 
> > I wasn't entirely sure how to deal with the address ranges for the
> > generic implementation in asm-generic/io.h. It's marked with a
> > TODO.
> > Input appreciated.
> 
> I commented on the function directly. To clarify, I think we should
> be able to directly turn each pci_iounmap() definition into
> a iomem_is_ioport() definition by keeping the logic unchanged
> and just return 'true' for the PIO variant or 'false' for the MMIO
> version.
> 
> > I removed the guard around define pci_iounmap in asm-generic/io.h.
> > An
> > alternative would be to have it be guarded by CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP
> > and
> > CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP, both. Without such a guard, there is no
> > collision however, because generic pci_iounmap() from
> > drivers/pci/iomap.c will only get pulled in when
> > CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP is actually set.
> 
> The "#define pci_iomap" can be removed entirely I think.

I also think it can, because first arch/asm/io.h includes asm-
generic/io.h.
I was just wondering why many other functions in asm-generic/io.h
always define their own names..

It's obviously very hard to test which config will break, so I thought
it's better safe than sorry here

P.

> 
>      Arnd
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-01 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-01 12:16 [PATCH v2 0/4] Regather scattered PCI-Code Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] lib: move pci_iomap.c to drivers/pci/ Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 14:43   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 18:56     ` Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 22:17       ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] lib: move pci-specific devres code " Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 14:44   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 19:00     ` Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 22:31       ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] pci: move devres code from pci.c to devres.c Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] lib, pci: unify generic pci_iounmap() Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 15:26   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 19:37     ` Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 21:32       ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 21:56         ` Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 21:59           ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Regather scattered PCI-Code Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 19:09   ` Philipp Stanner [this message]
2023-12-01 22:17     ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65079f6d5f512f9aff003bdfea127b214a9f9290.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pstanner@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dakr@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=koshchanka@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=sanpeqf@gmail.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wuqiang.matt@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox