From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: "Bowman, Terry" <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
dave@stgolabs.net, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com, ming.li@zohomail.com,
Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com, rrichter@amd.com,
dan.carpenter@linaro.org, PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com,
lukas@wunner.de, Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, alucerop@amd.com, ira.weiny@intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 21/23] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL uncorrectable protocol error recovery
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 12:48:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a439ac23-2f8e-463c-a3bb-467c27b4a8b6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67d11134-8916-4ef8-ab78-06bcbb87d9cb@amd.com>
On 9/11/25 12:19 PM, Bowman, Terry wrote:
>
>
> On 9/3/2025 5:30 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
>>
>> On 8/26/25 6:35 PM, Terry Bowman wrote:
>>> Populate the cxl_do_recovery() function with uncorrectable protocol error (UCE)
>>> handling. Follow similar design as found in PCIe error driver,
>>> pcie_do_recovery(). One difference is cxl_do_recovery() will treat all UCEs
>>> as fatal with a kernel panic. This is to prevent corruption on CXL memory.
>>>
>>> Introduce cxl_walk_port(). Make this analogous to pci_walk_bridge() but walking
>>> CXL ports instead. This will iterate through the CXL topology from the
>>> erroring device through the downstream CXL Ports and Endpoints.
>>>
>>> Export pci_aer_clear_fatal_status() for CXL to use if a UCE is not found.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v10->v11:
>>> - pci_ers_merge_results() - Move to earlier patch
>>> ---
>>> drivers/cxl/core/port.c | 1 +
>>> drivers/cxl/core/ras.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/pci/pci.h | 2 -
>>> include/linux/aer.h | 2 +
>>> 4 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
>>> index 758fb73374c1..085c8620a797 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
>>> @@ -1347,6 +1347,7 @@ struct cxl_port *find_cxl_port(struct device *dport_dev,
>>> port = __find_cxl_port(&ctx);
>>> return port;
>>> }
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(find_cxl_port, "CXL");
>>>
>>> static struct cxl_port *find_cxl_port_at(struct cxl_port *parent_port,
>>> struct device *dport_dev,
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
>>> index 536ca9c815ce..3da675f72616 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
>>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>>> #include <cxl/event.h>
>>> #include <cxlmem.h>
>>> #include <cxlpci.h>
>>> +#include <cxl.h>
>>> #include "trace.h"
>>>
>>> static void cxl_cper_trace_corr_port_prot_err(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>> @@ -468,8 +469,101 @@ void cxl_endpoint_port_init_ras(struct cxl_port *ep)
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_endpoint_port_init_ras, "CXL");
>>>
>>> +static int cxl_report_error_detected(struct device *dev, void *data)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>>> + pci_ers_result_t vote, *result = data;
>>> +
>>> + guard(device)(dev);
>>> +
>>> + if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT)
>>> + vote = cxl_error_detected(dev);
>>> + else
>>> + vote = cxl_port_error_detected(dev);
>>> +
>>> + vote = cxl_error_detected(dev);
>>> + *result = pci_ers_merge_result(*result, vote);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int match_port_by_parent_dport(struct device *dev, const void *dport_dev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct cxl_port *port;
>>> +
>>> + if (!is_cxl_port(dev))
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + port = to_cxl_port(dev);
>>> +
>>> + return port->parent_dport->dport_dev == dport_dev;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void cxl_walk_port(struct device *port_dev,
>>> + int (*cb)(struct device *, void *),
>>> + void *userdata)
>>> +{
>>> + struct cxl_dport *dport = NULL;
>>> + struct cxl_port *port;
>>> + unsigned long index;
>>> +
>>> + if (!port_dev)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + port = to_cxl_port(port_dev);
>>> + if (port->uport_dev && dev_is_pci(port->uport_dev))
>>> + cb(port->uport_dev, userdata);
>>> +
>>> + xa_for_each(&port->dports, index, dport)
>>> + {
>>> + struct device *child_port_dev __free(put_device) =
>>> + bus_find_device(&cxl_bus_type, &port->dev, dport,
>>> + match_port_by_parent_dport);
>>> +
>>> + cb(dport->dport_dev, userdata);
>>> +
>>> + cxl_walk_port(child_port_dev, cxl_report_error_detected, userdata);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (is_cxl_endpoint(port))
>>> + cb(port->uport_dev->parent, userdata);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void cxl_do_recovery(struct device *dev)
>>> {
>>> + pci_ers_result_t status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER;
>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>>> + struct cxl_dport *dport;
>>> + struct cxl_port *port;
>>> +
>>> + if ((pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) ||
>>> + (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM)) {
>>> + port = find_cxl_port(&pdev->dev, &dport);
>>> + } else if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) {
>>> + struct device *port_dev = bus_find_device(&cxl_bus_type, NULL,
>>> + &pdev->dev, match_uport);
>>> + port = to_cxl_port(port_dev);
>>> + }
>> Do we not attempt recovery if the device is an endpoint? Is it because it is handled directly by AER callback of the cxl_pci driver? Should endpoint error just not be forwarded from the AER kfifo producer instead of being checked on the consumer end after going through the kfifo mechanism?
>>
>> DJ
>
> The UCE fatal case is handled in the PCIe AER handling callback which is
> what I used for testing. I need to add EP support here for use in the EP
> UCE non-fatal case.
I think that's what's missing. My point is why forward the information to just be dropped. Maybe a comment to make note of that if the support is not there yet.
DJ
>
> I don't think bypassing the kfifo for EPs is ideal. The only headache with
> the EPs is EP fatal UCE is handled in PCIe AER callbacks. We may be able to
> improve with future series by adding logic to detect the link health and then
> access if ok in the UCE fatal case.
>
> Terry
>
>>> +
>>> + if (!port)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + cxl_walk_port(&port->dev, cxl_report_error_detected, &status);
>>> + if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_PANIC)
>>> + panic("CXL cachemem error.");
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * If we have native control of AER, clear error status in the device
>>> + * that detected the error. If the platform retained control of AER,
>>> + * it is responsible for clearing this status. In that case, the
>>> + * signaling device may not even be visible to the OS.
>>> + */
>>> + if (cxl_error_is_native(pdev)) {
>>> + pcie_clear_device_status(pdev);
>>> + pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(pdev);
>>> + pci_aer_clear_fatal_status(pdev);
>>> + }
>>> + put_device(&port->dev);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void cxl_handle_cor_ras(struct device *dev, u64 serial, void __iomem *ras_base)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
>>> index 69ff7c2d214f..0c4f73dd645f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
>>> @@ -1170,13 +1170,11 @@ static inline void cxl_rch_enable_rcec(struct pci_dev *rcec) { }
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_CXL_RAS
>>> void pci_aer_unmask_internal_errors(struct pci_dev *dev);
>>> -bool cxl_error_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev);
>>> bool is_internal_error(struct aer_err_info *info);
>>> bool is_cxl_error(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct aer_err_info *info);
>>> void cxl_forward_error(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct aer_err_info *info);
>>> #else
>>> static inline void pci_aer_unmask_internal_errors(struct pci_dev *dev) { }
>>> -static inline bool cxl_error_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev) { return false; }
>>> static inline bool is_internal_error(struct aer_err_info *info) { return false; }
>>> static inline bool is_cxl_error(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct aer_err_info *info) { return false; }
>>> static inline void cxl_forward_error(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct aer_err_info *info) { }
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/aer.h b/include/linux/aer.h
>>> index 1f79f0be4bf7..751a026fea73 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/aer.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/aer.h
>>> @@ -81,10 +81,12 @@ static inline int pcie_aer_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev) { return 0; }
>>> int cxl_proto_err_kfifo_get(struct cxl_proto_err_work_data *wd);
>>> void cxl_register_proto_err_work(struct work_struct *work);
>>> void cxl_unregister_proto_err_work(void);
>>> +bool cxl_error_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev);
>>> #else
>>> static inline int cxl_proto_err_kfifo_get(struct cxl_proto_err_work_data *wd) { return 0; }
>>> static inline void cxl_register_proto_err_work(struct work_struct *work) { }
>>> static inline void cxl_unregister_proto_err_work(void) { }
>>> +static inline bool cxl_error_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev) { return false; }
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> void pci_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int aer_severity,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-11 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-27 1:35 [PATCH v11 00/23] Enable CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling and logging Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 01/23] cxl: Remove ifdef blocks of CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL from core/pci.c Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 02/23] CXL/AER: Remove CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL and replace with CONFIG_CXL_RAS Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 15:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-29 18:16 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 03/23] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL Endpoint handling helper functions Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 15:28 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 04/23] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL RCH " Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 8:35 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-08-28 17:32 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 05/23] cxl: Move CXL driver RCH error handling into CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS conditional block Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 8:57 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-09-10 16:43 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-29 15:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11 17:48 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:41 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-15 13:32 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 06/23] CXL/AER: Introduce rch_aer.c into AER driver for handling CXL RCH errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 20:53 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-29 8:39 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 17:01 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 17:26 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-12 13:59 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-12 19:09 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 16:56 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 12:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 07/23] CXL/PCI: Move CXL DVSEC definitions into uapi/linux/pci_regs.h Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 14:51 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-29 15:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-29 15:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-28 21:07 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 18:11 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 20:06 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 08/23] PCI/CXL: Introduce pcie_is_cxl() Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 8:18 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-09-10 16:24 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 3:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 13:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 09/23] PCI/AER: Report CXL or PCIe bus error type in trace logging Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 7:37 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 15:26 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 15:33 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-11 5:07 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 10/23] CXL/AER: Update PCI class code check to use FIELD_GET() Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 16:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11 18:18 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 11/23] cxl/pci: Update RAS handler interfaces to also support CXL Ports Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 12/23] cxl/pci: Log message if RAS registers are unmapped Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 13/23] cxl/pci: Unify CXL trace logging for CXL Endpoints and CXL Ports Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 11:55 ` Shiju Jose
2025-08-29 16:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 14/23] cxl/pci: Update cxl_handle_cor_ras() to return early if no RAS errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 15/23] cxl/pci: Map CXL Endpoint Port and CXL Switch Port RAS registers Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 23:05 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 18:40 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 16/23] cxl/pci: Introduce CXL Endpoint protocol error handlers Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 7:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 13:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 17/23] CXL/AER: Introduce cxl_aer.c into AER driver for forwarding CXL errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 7:56 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 18/23] PCI/AER: Dequeue forwarded CXL error Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 0:43 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-29 7:10 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-16 15:18 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 14:33 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 15:41 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-11 16:47 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:45 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 13:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 19/23] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL Port protocol error handlers Terry Bowman
2025-08-30 0:17 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 20/23] CXL/PCI: Export and rename merge_result() to pci_ers_merge_result() Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 8:04 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 15:57 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 3:44 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27 12:19 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 21/23] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL uncorrectable protocol error recovery Terry Bowman
2025-09-03 22:30 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-11 19:19 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:48 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2025-09-10 13:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 22/23] CXL/PCI: Enable CXL protocol errors during CXL Port probe Terry Bowman
2025-09-03 23:23 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 23/23] CXL/PCI: Disable CXL protocol error interrupts during CXL Port cleanup Terry Bowman
2025-09-10 15:07 ` Gregory Price
2025-09-11 20:19 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-29 0:07 ` [PATCH v11 00/23] Enable CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling and logging Dave Jiang
2025-09-23 3:29 ` Gregory Price
2025-09-23 9:21 ` Srinivasulu Thanneeru
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a439ac23-2f8e-463c-a3bb-467c27b4a8b6@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com \
--cc=PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com \
--cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=alucerop@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox