Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bowman, Terry" <terry.bowman@amd.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: dave@stgolabs.net, dave.jiang@intel.com,
	alison.schofield@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com, ming.li@zohomail.com,
	Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com, rrichter@amd.com,
	dan.carpenter@linaro.org, PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com,
	lukas@wunner.de, Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com,
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, alucerop@amd.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 05/23] cxl: Move CXL driver RCH error handling into CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS conditional block
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 12:48:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee9d1e0b-1583-4fd0-9598-753219957df1@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250829163355.00004fda@huawei.com>



On 8/29/2025 10:33 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 20:35:20 -0500
> Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com> wrote:
>
>> Restricted CXL Host (RCH) protocol error handling uses a procedure distinct
>> from the CXL Virtual Hierarchy (VH) handling. This is because of the
>> differences in the RCH and VH topologies. Improve the maintainability and
>> add ability to enable/disable RCH handling.
>>
>> Move and combine the RCH handling code into a single block conditionally
>> compiled with the CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS kernel config.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
>>
> How painful to move this to a ras_rch.c file and conditionally compile that?
>
> Would want to do that is some merged thing with patch 1 though, rather than
> moving at least some of the code twice.
>

I don't see an issue and the effort would be a simple rework of patch1 as you 
mentioned. But, it would drop the 'reviewed-by' sign-offs. Should we check with 
others about this too? 

Terry

>
>> ---
>> v10->v11:
>> - New patch
>> ---
>>  drivers/cxl/core/ras.c | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
>> index 0875ce8116ff..f42f9a255ef8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
>> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ void cxl_ras_exit(void)
>>  	cancel_work_sync(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work);
>>  }
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS
>>  static void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>>  {
>>  	resource_size_t aer_phys;
>> @@ -141,18 +142,6 @@ static void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void cxl_dport_map_ras(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>> -{
>> -	struct cxl_register_map *map = &dport->reg_map;
>> -	struct device *dev = dport->dport_dev;
>> -
>> -	if (!map->component_map.ras.valid)
>> -		dev_dbg(dev, "RAS registers not found\n");
>> -	else if (cxl_map_component_regs(map, &dport->regs.component,
>> -					BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)))
>> -		dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
>> -}
>> -
>>  static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>>  {
>>  	void __iomem *aer_base = dport->regs.dport_aer;
>> @@ -177,6 +166,95 @@ static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>>  	writel(aer_cmd, aer_base + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND);
>>  }
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * Copy the AER capability registers using 32 bit read accesses.
>> + * This is necessary because RCRB AER capability is MMIO mapped. Clear the
>> + * status after copying.
>> + *
>> + * @aer_base: base address of AER capability block in RCRB
>> + * @aer_regs: destination for copying AER capability
>> + */
>> +static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_info(void __iomem *aer_base,
>> +				 struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs)
>> +{
>> +	int read_cnt = sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs) / sizeof(u32);
>> +	u32 *aer_regs_buf = (u32 *)aer_regs;
>> +	int n;
>> +
>> +	if (!aer_base)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	/* Use readl() to guarantee 32-bit accesses */
>> +	for (n = 0; n < read_cnt; n++)
>> +		aer_regs_buf[n] = readl(aer_base + n * sizeof(u32));
>> +
>> +	writel(aer_regs->uncor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS);
>> +	writel(aer_regs->cor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS);
>> +
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Get AER severity. Return false if there is no error. */
>> +static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs,
>> +				     int *severity)
>> +{
>> +	if (aer_regs->uncor_status & ~aer_regs->uncor_mask) {
>> +		if (aer_regs->uncor_status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
>> +			*severity = AER_FATAL;
>> +		else
>> +			*severity = AER_NONFATAL;
>> +		return true;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (aer_regs->cor_status & ~aer_regs->cor_mask) {
>> +		*severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
>> +		return true;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
>> +{
>> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(cxlds->dev);
>> +	struct aer_capability_regs aer_regs;
>> +	struct cxl_dport *dport;
>> +	int severity;
>> +
>> +	struct cxl_port *port __free(put_cxl_port) =
>> +		cxl_pci_find_port(pdev, &dport);
>> +	if (!port)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_info(dport->regs.dport_aer, &aer_regs))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(&aer_regs, &severity))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	pci_print_aer(pdev, severity, &aer_regs);
>> +	if (severity == AER_CORRECTABLE)
>> +		cxl_handle_cor_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
>> +	else
>> +		cxl_handle_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static inline void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport) { }
>> +static inline void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport) { }
>> +static inline void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds) { }
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static void cxl_dport_map_ras(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>> +{
>> +	struct cxl_register_map *map = &dport->reg_map;
>> +	struct device *dev = dport->dport_dev;
>> +
>> +	if (!map->component_map.ras.valid)
>> +		dev_dbg(dev, "RAS registers not found\n");
>> +	else if (cxl_map_component_regs(map, &dport->regs.component,
>> +					BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)))
>> +		dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
>> +}
>>  
>>  /**
>>   * cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting - Setup CXL RAS report on this dport
>> @@ -270,79 +348,6 @@ static bool cxl_handle_ras(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, void __iomem *ras_base)
>>  	return true;
>>  }
>>  
>> -/*
>> - * Copy the AER capability registers using 32 bit read accesses.
>> - * This is necessary because RCRB AER capability is MMIO mapped. Clear the
>> - * status after copying.
>> - *
>> - * @aer_base: base address of AER capability block in RCRB
>> - * @aer_regs: destination for copying AER capability
>> - */
>> -static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_info(void __iomem *aer_base,
>> -				 struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs)
>> -{
>> -	int read_cnt = sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs) / sizeof(u32);
>> -	u32 *aer_regs_buf = (u32 *)aer_regs;
>> -	int n;
>> -
>> -	if (!aer_base)
>> -		return false;
>> -
>> -	/* Use readl() to guarantee 32-bit accesses */
>> -	for (n = 0; n < read_cnt; n++)
>> -		aer_regs_buf[n] = readl(aer_base + n * sizeof(u32));
>> -
>> -	writel(aer_regs->uncor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS);
>> -	writel(aer_regs->cor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS);
>> -
>> -	return true;
>> -}
>> -
>> -/* Get AER severity. Return false if there is no error. */
>> -static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs,
>> -				     int *severity)
>> -{
>> -	if (aer_regs->uncor_status & ~aer_regs->uncor_mask) {
>> -		if (aer_regs->uncor_status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
>> -			*severity = AER_FATAL;
>> -		else
>> -			*severity = AER_NONFATAL;
>> -		return true;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	if (aer_regs->cor_status & ~aer_regs->cor_mask) {
>> -		*severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
>> -		return true;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	return false;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
>> -{
>> -	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(cxlds->dev);
>> -	struct aer_capability_regs aer_regs;
>> -	struct cxl_dport *dport;
>> -	int severity;
>> -
>> -	struct cxl_port *port __free(put_cxl_port) =
>> -		cxl_pci_find_port(pdev, &dport);
>> -	if (!port)
>> -		return;
>> -
>> -	if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_info(dport->regs.dport_aer, &aer_regs))
>> -		return;
>> -
>> -	if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(&aer_regs, &severity))
>> -		return;
>> -
>> -	pci_print_aer(pdev, severity, &aer_regs);
>> -	if (severity == AER_CORRECTABLE)
>> -		cxl_handle_cor_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
>> -	else
>> -		cxl_handle_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
>> -}
>> -
>>  void cxl_cor_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>  {
>>  	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-11 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-27  1:35 [PATCH v11 00/23] Enable CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling and logging Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 01/23] cxl: Remove ifdef blocks of CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL from core/pci.c Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 02/23] CXL/AER: Remove CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL and replace with CONFIG_CXL_RAS Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 15:24   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-29 18:16   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 03/23] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL Endpoint handling helper functions Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 15:28   ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 04/23] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL RCH " Terry Bowman
2025-08-28  8:35   ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-08-28 17:32   ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 05/23] cxl: Move CXL driver RCH error handling into CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS conditional block Terry Bowman
2025-08-28  8:57   ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-09-10 16:43     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-29 15:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11 17:48     ` Bowman, Terry [this message]
2025-09-11 19:41       ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-15 13:32         ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 06/23] CXL/AER: Introduce rch_aer.c into AER driver for handling CXL RCH errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 20:53   ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-29  8:39     ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 17:01       ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 17:26         ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-12 13:59       ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-12 19:09         ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 16:56     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 12:43   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 07/23] CXL/PCI: Move CXL DVSEC definitions into uapi/linux/pci_regs.h Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 14:51   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-29 15:42     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-29 15:47     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-28 21:07   ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 18:11     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 20:06       ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 08/23] PCI/CXL: Introduce pcie_is_cxl() Terry Bowman
2025-08-28  8:18   ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-09-10 16:24     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11  3:48       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 13:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 09/23] PCI/AER: Report CXL or PCIe bus error type in trace logging Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  7:37   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 15:26     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 15:33       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-11  5:07   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 10/23] CXL/AER: Update PCI class code check to use FIELD_GET() Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 16:03   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11 18:18     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 11/23] cxl/pci: Update RAS handler interfaces to also support CXL Ports Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 12/23] cxl/pci: Log message if RAS registers are unmapped Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 13/23] cxl/pci: Unify CXL trace logging for CXL Endpoints and CXL Ports Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 11:55   ` Shiju Jose
2025-08-29 16:06     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 14/23] cxl/pci: Update cxl_handle_cor_ras() to return early if no RAS errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 15/23] cxl/pci: Map CXL Endpoint Port and CXL Switch Port RAS registers Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 23:05   ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 18:40     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 16/23] cxl/pci: Introduce CXL Endpoint protocol error handlers Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  7:48   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 13:23   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 17/23] CXL/AER: Introduce cxl_aer.c into AER driver for forwarding CXL errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  7:56   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 18/23] PCI/AER: Dequeue forwarded CXL error Terry Bowman
2025-08-29  0:43   ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-29  7:10     ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-16 15:18       ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 14:33     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 15:41       ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-11 16:47         ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:45           ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 13:29   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 19/23] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL Port protocol error handlers Terry Bowman
2025-08-30  0:17   ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 20/23] CXL/PCI: Export and rename merge_result() to pci_ers_merge_result() Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  8:04   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 15:57     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11  3:44       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27 12:19   ` kernel test robot
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 21/23] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL uncorrectable protocol error recovery Terry Bowman
2025-09-03 22:30   ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-11 19:19     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:48       ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 13:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 22/23] CXL/PCI: Enable CXL protocol errors during CXL Port probe Terry Bowman
2025-09-03 23:23   ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 23/23] CXL/PCI: Disable CXL protocol error interrupts during CXL Port cleanup Terry Bowman
2025-09-10 15:07   ` Gregory Price
2025-09-11 20:19     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-29  0:07 ` [PATCH v11 00/23] Enable CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling and logging Dave Jiang
2025-09-23  3:29 ` Gregory Price
2025-09-23  9:21   ` Srinivasulu Thanneeru

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ee9d1e0b-1583-4fd0-9598-753219957df1@amd.com \
    --to=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    --cc=Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com \
    --cc=PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=alucerop@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
    --cc=rrichter@amd.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox