From: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
To: Srirangan Madhavan <smadhavan@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vsethi@nvidia.com,
alwilliamson@nvidia.com, Dan Williams <danwilliams@nvidia.com>,
Sai Yashwanth Reddy Kancherla <skancherla@nvidia.com>,
Vishal Aslot <vaslot@nvidia.com>,
Manish Honap <mhonap@nvidia.com>, Jiandi An <jan@nvidia.com>,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/9] PCI/CXL: Add sibling function coordination for reset
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 19:15:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahgiY245F30Oc51e@MWDK4CY14F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528083154.137979-5-smadhavan@nvidia.com>
On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 08:31:49AM +0800, Srirangan Madhavan wrote:
> Add helpers to collect CXL sibling PCI functions affected by a CXL reset
> and prepare them for reset by saving and disabling them. Restore those
> siblings and drop their references when reset coordination completes.
>
> Use the Non-CXL Function Map DVSEC to exclude non-CXL functions, and
> filter remaining siblings to functions that advertise CXL.cache or
> CXL.mem capability.
>
> Use pci_dev_trylock() for sibling locking and unwind on contention or
> allocation failure, so competing reset paths fail with an errno.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srirangan Madhavan <smadhavan@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 209 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> index 318744695f62..01effbb4e7cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> @@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> /* Copyright(c) 2021 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. */
> #include <linux/units.h>
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
> #include <linux/memregion.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <linux/pci-doe.h>
> @@ -15,6 +17,10 @@
> #include "core.h"
> #include "trace.h"
>
> +#define CXL_RESET_MAX_FUNCTIONS 256
> +#define CXL_RESET_FUNCTION_MAP_REGS (CXL_RESET_MAX_FUNCTIONS / 32)
> +#define CXL_RESET_SIBLINGS_INIT 8
> +
> /**
> * DOC: cxl core pci
> *
> @@ -1096,3 +1102,204 @@ cxl_reset_flush_cpu_caches(struct cxl_reset_region_context *ctx)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +struct cxl_reset_context {
> + struct pci_dev *target;
> + struct pci_dev **siblings;
> + int nr_siblings;
> + int sibling_capacity;
> + int nr_siblings_prepared;
> +};
> +
> +struct cxl_reset_walk_ctx {
> + struct cxl_reset_context *ctx;
> + unsigned long *non_cxl_func_map;
> + int rc;
> +};
> +
> +static void
> +cxl_reset_read_non_cxl_func_map(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + unsigned long *non_cxl_func_map)
> +{
> + u32 map[CXL_RESET_FUNCTION_MAP_REGS] = {};
> + u16 dvsec;
> + int rc, i;
> +
> + bitmap_zero(non_cxl_func_map, CXL_RESET_MAX_FUNCTIONS);
> +
> + dvsec = pci_find_dvsec_capability(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
> + PCI_DVSEC_CXL_FUNCTION_MAP);
> + if (!dvsec)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < CXL_RESET_FUNCTION_MAP_REGS; i++) {
> + rc = pci_read_config_dword(pdev,
> + dvsec + PCI_DVSEC_CXL_FUNCTION_MAP_REG +
> + i * sizeof(map[i]), &map[i]);
> + if (rc) {
> + pci_warn(pdev,
> + "failed to read CXL Function Map; treating all siblings as CXL: %d\n",
> + rc);
> + bitmap_zero(non_cxl_func_map, CXL_RESET_MAX_FUNCTIONS);
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + bitmap_from_arr32(non_cxl_func_map, map, CXL_RESET_MAX_FUNCTIONS);
> +}
> +
> +static bool cxl_reset_is_cxl_sibling(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + struct pci_dev *sibling,
> + unsigned long *non_cxl_func_map)
> +{
> + if (sibling == pdev || sibling->bus != pdev->bus)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (pci_ari_enabled(pdev->bus))
> + return !test_bit(sibling->devfn, non_cxl_func_map);
> +
> + if (PCI_SLOT(sibling->devfn) != PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn))
> + return false;
> +
> + return !test_bit(PCI_FUNC(sibling->devfn) * 32 +
> + PCI_SLOT(sibling->devfn), non_cxl_func_map);
> +}
> +
Acked on sashiko-bot's finding, and even more, since the function already
does the check of whether sibling devfn is equal to the device's devfn slot or not,
PCI_SLOT(sibling->devfn) is guaranteed equal to the target's slot. It's a constant.
According to the spec, the Non-CXL Function Map is one bit per function within the same
multi-function device. I think the following change would be reasonable
"""
return !test_bit(PCI_FUNC(sibling->devfn), non_cxl_func_map);
"""
and besides the false-negative case, I think the more common case would be false positive, e.g.
F>=1 reads bits 32, 64, ... in the reserved portion of the 256-bit map, which are almost always
clear, so non-CXL siblings get pulled into the CXL reset path.
Best regards,
Richard Cheng.
> +static bool cxl_reset_has_cache_or_mem(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + u16 dvsec, cap;
> +
> + dvsec = pci_find_dvsec_capability(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
> + PCI_DVSEC_CXL_DEVICE);
> + if (!dvsec)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (pci_read_config_word(pdev, dvsec + PCI_DVSEC_CXL_CAP, &cap))
> + return false;
> +
> + return cap & (PCI_DVSEC_CXL_CACHE_CAPABLE | PCI_DVSEC_CXL_MEM_CAPABLE);
> +}
> +
> +static int cxl_reset_add_sibling(struct cxl_reset_context *ctx,
> + struct pci_dev *sibling)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev **siblings;
> + int capacity;
> +
> + if (ctx->nr_siblings < ctx->sibling_capacity)
> + goto add;
> +
> + capacity = ctx->sibling_capacity ? ctx->sibling_capacity * 2 :
> + CXL_RESET_SIBLINGS_INIT;
> + siblings = krealloc(ctx->siblings, capacity * sizeof(*siblings),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!siblings)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ctx->siblings = siblings;
> + ctx->sibling_capacity = capacity;
> +
> +add:
> + pci_dev_get(sibling);
> + ctx->siblings[ctx->nr_siblings++] = sibling;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cxl_reset_collect_sibling(struct pci_dev *sibling, void *data)
> +{
> + struct cxl_reset_walk_ctx *wctx = data;
> + struct cxl_reset_context *ctx = wctx->ctx;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = ctx->target;
> +
> + if (!cxl_reset_is_cxl_sibling(pdev, sibling, wctx->non_cxl_func_map))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!cxl_reset_has_cache_or_mem(sibling))
> + return 0;
> +
> + wctx->rc = cxl_reset_add_sibling(ctx, sibling);
> + return wctx->rc;
> +}
> +
> +static int cxl_reset_collect_siblings(struct cxl_reset_context *ctx)
> +{
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(non_cxl_func_map, CXL_RESET_MAX_FUNCTIONS);
> + struct cxl_reset_walk_ctx wctx = {
> + .ctx = ctx,
> + .non_cxl_func_map = non_cxl_func_map,
> + };
> +
> + cxl_reset_read_non_cxl_func_map(ctx->target, non_cxl_func_map);
> + pci_walk_bus(ctx->target->bus, cxl_reset_collect_sibling, &wctx);
> + return wctx.rc;
> +}
> +
> +static void cxl_pci_functions_reset_done(struct cxl_reset_context *ctx)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = ctx->nr_siblings_prepared - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> + struct pci_dev *sibling = ctx->siblings[i];
> +
> + pci_dev_reset_iommu_done(sibling);
> + pci_dev_restore(sibling);
> + pci_dev_unlock(sibling);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ctx->nr_siblings; i++)
> + pci_dev_put(ctx->siblings[i]);
> +
> + kfree(ctx->siblings);
> + ctx->siblings = NULL;
> + ctx->nr_siblings = 0;
> + ctx->sibling_capacity = 0;
> + ctx->nr_siblings_prepared = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused
> +cxl_pci_functions_reset_prepare(struct cxl_reset_context *ctx)
> +{
> + int rc, i;
> +
> + ctx->siblings = NULL;
> + ctx->nr_siblings = 0;
> + ctx->sibling_capacity = 0;
> + ctx->nr_siblings_prepared = 0;
> +
> + rc = cxl_reset_collect_siblings(ctx);
> + if (rc)
> + goto err;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ctx->nr_siblings; i++) {
> + struct pci_dev *sibling = ctx->siblings[i];
> +
> + if (!pci_dev_trylock(sibling)) {
> + rc = -EAGAIN;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + pci_dev_save_and_disable(sibling);
> + rc = pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare(sibling);
> + if (rc) {
> + pci_err(sibling,
> + "failed to block IOMMU for CXL reset: %d\n",
> + rc);
> + /*
> + * Undo save_and_disable() for this sibling. IOMMU
> + * prepare failed, so this sibling is not counted in
> + * nr_siblings_prepared and must not get iommu_done().
> + */
> + pci_dev_restore(sibling);
> + pci_dev_unlock(sibling);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + ctx->nr_siblings_prepared++;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err:
> + cxl_pci_functions_reset_done(ctx);
> + return rc;
> +}
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> index 14f634ab9350..fa1fcd26af01 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> @@ -1349,6 +1349,7 @@
> /* CXL r4.0, 8.1.3: PCIe DVSEC for CXL Device */
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_DEVICE 0
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_CAP 0xA
> +#define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_CACHE_CAPABLE _BITUL(0)
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_MEM_CAPABLE _BITUL(2)
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_HDM_COUNT __GENMASK(5, 4)
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_CTRL 0xC
> @@ -1366,6 +1367,7 @@
>
> /* CXL r4.0, 8.1.4: Non-CXL Function Map DVSEC */
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_FUNCTION_MAP 2
> +#define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_FUNCTION_MAP_REG 0x0C
>
> /* CXL r4.0, 8.1.5: Extensions DVSEC for Ports */
> #define PCI_DVSEC_CXL_PORT 3
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 8:31 [PATCH v6 0/9] cxl: Add cxl_reset sysfs attribute for memdevs Srirangan Madhavan
2026-05-28 8:31 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] cxl/hdm: Add helpers to restore and commit memdev decoders Srirangan Madhavan
2026-05-28 9:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-28 11:06 ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-02 18:12 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-02 18:31 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-02 20:34 ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2026-06-03 22:35 ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-05-28 8:31 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] PCI: Export pci_dev_save_and_disable() and pci_dev_restore() Srirangan Madhavan
2026-06-02 20:18 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-03 22:36 ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-05-28 8:31 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] cxl: Add reset-idle and cache flush helpers Srirangan Madhavan
2026-05-28 10:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-02 20:34 ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2026-06-02 20:36 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-04 2:49 ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-05-28 8:31 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] PCI/CXL: Add sibling function coordination for reset Srirangan Madhavan
2026-05-28 10:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-28 11:15 ` Richard Cheng [this message]
2026-06-02 22:10 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-04 3:13 ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-05-28 8:31 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] cxl/pci: Add CXL DVSEC reset helper Srirangan Madhavan
2026-05-28 11:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-02 20:34 ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2026-05-28 8:31 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] cxl/pci: Track memdevs affected by CXL reset Srirangan Madhavan
2026-05-28 11:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-02 20:34 ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2026-05-28 8:31 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] cxl/pci: Orchestrate CXL reset for affected memdevs Srirangan Madhavan
2026-05-28 12:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-02 20:34 ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2026-06-04 3:25 ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-05-28 8:31 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] cxl/memdev: Add cxl_reset sysfs attribute Srirangan Madhavan
2026-05-28 13:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-02 21:35 ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2026-06-02 23:50 ` Dave Jiang
2026-05-28 8:31 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] Documentation/ABI: Document CXL memdev cxl_reset Srirangan Madhavan
2026-06-03 0:11 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-02 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 0/9] cxl: Add cxl_reset sysfs attribute for memdevs Cheatham, Benjamin
2026-06-02 21:42 ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahgiY245F30Oc51e@MWDK4CY14F \
--to=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=alwilliamson@nvidia.com \
--cc=danwilliams@nvidia.com \
--cc=jan@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhonap@nvidia.com \
--cc=skancherla@nvidia.com \
--cc=smadhavan@nvidia.com \
--cc=vaslot@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox