From: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
To: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@ti.com>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<tjoseph@cadence.com>, <nm@ti.com>, <a-verma1@ti.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] PCI: j721e: Add PCIe 4x lane selection support
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 17:23:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e33dc6fd-1227-e01f-715e-947fac2fd233@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221020012911.305139-2-mranostay@ti.com>
Hi Matt,
On 20/10/22 6:59 am, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> Add support for setting of two-bit field that allows selection of 4x
> lane PCIe which was previously limited to only 2x lanes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c
> index a82f845cc4b5..d9b1527421c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ enum link_status {
> };
>
> #define J721E_MODE_RC BIT(7)
> -#define LANE_COUNT_MASK BIT(8)
> #define LANE_COUNT(n) ((n) << 8)
>
> #define GENERATION_SEL_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
> @@ -207,11 +206,15 @@ static int j721e_pcie_set_lane_count(struct j721e_pcie *pcie,
> {
> struct device *dev = pcie->cdns_pcie->dev;
> u32 lanes = pcie->num_lanes;
> + u32 mask = GENMASK(8, 8);
> u32 val = 0;
> int ret;
>
> + if (lanes == 4)
> + mask = GENMASK(9, 8);
Shouldn't we decide "mask" based on max_lanes added in 2/3 (ie how many
lanes HW can support and thus width of this bit field) instead of
num_lanes? Hypothetically, what if bootloader / other entity has set MSb
but Linux is restricted to 2 lanes in DT?
> +
> val = LANE_COUNT(lanes - 1);
> - ret = regmap_update_bits(syscon, offset, LANE_COUNT_MASK, val);
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(syscon, offset, mask, val);
> if (ret)
> dev_err(dev, "failed to set link count\n");
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-25 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-20 1:29 [PATCH v3 0/3] PCI: add 4x lane support for pci-j721e controllers Matt Ranostay
2022-10-20 1:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] PCI: j721e: Add PCIe 4x lane selection support Matt Ranostay
2022-10-25 11:53 ` Vignesh Raghavendra [this message]
2022-10-25 12:51 ` Matt Ranostay
2022-10-20 1:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] PCI: j721e: Add per platform maximum lane settings Matt Ranostay
2022-10-20 1:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: j721e: Add warnings on num-lanes misconfiguration Matt Ranostay
2022-10-20 16:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e33dc6fd-1227-e01f-715e-947fac2fd233@ti.com \
--to=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=a-verma1@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mranostay@ti.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tjoseph@cadence.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox