Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tarun Sahu" <tarunsahu@google.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	joro@8bytes.org, "Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	maz@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	"David Matlack" <dmatlack@google.com>,
	jgg@nvidia.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, loganodell@google.com,
	oupton@kernel.org, kevin.tian@intel.com, alex@shazbot.org,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com,
	will@kernel.org, "Pasha Tatashin" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	"Alexander Graf" <graf@amazon.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Cc: sagis@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, skhawaja@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] liveupdate: Select file handler by name in the preserve ioctl
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 15:26:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-181696@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021152527.375070-3-tarunsahu@google.com>

> Currently luo_preserve_file() iterates over luo_file_handler_list and
> picks the first registered handler whose .can_preserve() callback
> returns true. When a subsystem introduces a new, backwards-incompatible
> file handler alongside an existing one for the same file type, userspace
> has no way to choose which handler preserves a file descriptor, nor can
> the kernel keep the existing rollback-safe handler as the default while
> allowing callers to opt into the new handler.
> 
> Append char handler[LIVEUPDATE_HNDL_NAME_LENGTH] to struct
> liveupdate_session_preserve_fd immediately after token, keeping
> IOCTL_OP min_size at offsetofend(..., token) so callers passing the
> original 16-byte structure continue to work:
> - When handler is empty (all-zero, or zero-filled when userspace
>   passes the 16-byte structure), luo_preserve_file() selects the first
>   registered handler whose .can_preserve() callback accepts the fd.
> - When handler is non-empty, it must be null-terminated within
>   LIVEUPDATE_HNDL_NAME_LENGTH bytes (returning -EINVAL otherwise);
>   luo_preserve_file() looks up the registered handler with that exact
>   name (returning -ENOENT if unknown) and verifies that its
>   .can_preserve() callback accepts the fd (returning -EINVAL if not).
> 
> The retrieve ioctl is unchanged because the handler is identified by the
> name stored in the serialized payload from the source kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tarun Sahu <tarunsahu@google.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261021152527.375070-1-tarunsahu@google.com?part=2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-22 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-21 15:25 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] liveupdate: Feature header ABI and named handler Tarun Sahu
2026-10-21 15:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] liveupdate: Rename handler compatible to name Tarun Sahu
2026-10-21 17:11   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 18:16     ` tarunsahu
2026-10-21 19:11       ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 19:35         ` tarunsahu
2026-10-23  7:44           ` Mike Rapoport
2026-10-23 21:51             ` tarunsahu
2026-10-22 15:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 15:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] liveupdate: Select file handler by name in the preserve ioctl Tarun Sahu
2026-10-21 17:17   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 23:02     ` David Matlack
2026-10-22  1:14       ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-22 17:57         ` David Matlack
2026-10-22 12:50     ` tarunsahu
2026-10-22 13:42       ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-22 15:26   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-21 15:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] liveupdate: Replace compatibility string with a 2-bit pair feature header Tarun Sahu
2026-10-21 17:27   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 17:40     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 17:55       ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 18:40     ` tarunsahu
2026-10-21 18:46       ` David Matlack
2026-10-21 18:50         ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 23:28           ` David Matlack
2026-10-22  1:26             ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-22  2:57               ` David Matlack
2026-10-22  3:32                 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-22  3:52                   ` David Matlack
2026-10-22  4:11                     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-22 17:51                       ` David Matlack
2026-10-22 20:53                         ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-23 13:50                           ` David Matlack
2026-10-25 20:38                             ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-26 20:49                               ` David Matlack
2026-10-27 16:21                                 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-27 17:33                                   ` David Matlack
2026-10-28 17:17                                 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-10-28 17:24                                   ` David Matlack
2026-10-28 17:47                                     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-28 17:44                                   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 23:55   ` David Matlack
2026-10-22  0:04     ` David Matlack
2026-10-26 11:50       ` tarunsahu
2026-10-26 21:14         ` David Matlack
2026-10-26 23:28           ` tarunsahu
2026-10-27  0:01             ` David Matlack
2026-10-27  0:55               ` Tarun Sahu
2026-10-27  3:26                 ` David Matlack
2026-10-27 16:40           ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-27 17:37             ` David Matlack
2026-10-27 21:57               ` tarunsahu
2026-10-22 15:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 15:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] mm: memfd_luo: Add the " Tarun Sahu
2026-10-21 17:38   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 23:18     ` David Matlack
2026-10-22  0:41       ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-22  2:51         ` David Matlack
2026-10-22  3:50           ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-22 15:26   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-181696@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loganodell@google.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sagis@google.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=tarunsahu@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox