* [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term
@ 2026-05-04 15:42 Athira Rajeev
2026-05-04 15:42 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] tools/perf: Use scnprintf in buffer offset calculations Athira Rajeev
2026-05-12 8:52 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Venkat
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2026-05-04 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acme, jolsa, adrian.hunter, mpetlan, tmricht, maddy, irogers,
namhyung
Cc: linux-perf-users, linuxppc-dev, atrajeev, hbathini, Tejas.Manhas1,
Tanushree.Shah, shivani
The format_alias() function in util/pmu.c has a check to
detect whether the event has parameterized field ( =? ).
The string alias->terms contains the event and if the event
has user configurable parameter, there will be presence of
sub string "=?" in the alias->terms.
Snippet of code:
/* Paramemterized events have the parameters shown. */
if (strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
/* No parameters. */
snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
if "strstr" contains the substring, it returns a pointer
and hence enters the above check which is not the expected
check. And hence "perf list" doesn't have the parameterized
fields in the result.
Fix this check to use:
if (!strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
With this change, perf list shows the events correctly with
the strings showing parameters.
Before the fix:
# ./perf list|grep -w PM_PAU_CYC
hv_24x7/PM_PAU_CYC/ [Kernel PMU event]
With this fix:
# ./perf list|grep -w PM_PAU_CYC
hv_24x7/PM_PAU_CYC,chip=?/ [Kernel PMU event]
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
---
Changelog:
v3 -> v4:
Updated commit message to show real example
addressing review comment from Namhyung.
v2 -> v3:
Split the strstr correction in a single patch
tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
index 23337d2fa281..0b8d58543f17 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
@@ -2117,7 +2117,7 @@ static char *format_alias(char *buf, int len, const struct perf_pmu *pmu,
skip_duplicate_pmus);
/* Paramemterized events have the parameters shown. */
- if (strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
+ if (!strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
/* No parameters. */
snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
return buf;
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V4 2/2] tools/perf: Use scnprintf in buffer offset calculations
2026-05-04 15:42 [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Athira Rajeev
@ 2026-05-04 15:42 ` Athira Rajeev
2026-05-13 1:02 ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-12 8:52 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Venkat
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2026-05-04 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acme, jolsa, adrian.hunter, mpetlan, tmricht, maddy, irogers,
namhyung
Cc: linux-perf-users, linuxppc-dev, atrajeev, hbathini, Tejas.Manhas1,
Tanushree.Shah, shivani
Replace snprintf with scnprintf in buffer offset calculations to
ensure the 'used' count will not exceed the "len".
The current logic in perf_pmu__for_each_event uses an unconditional
+ 1 increment to buf_used to account for null terminators. This can
cause a a stack buffer overflow in the subsequent scnprintf call.
When the local stack buffer buf (1024 bytes) is full, buf_used can
reach 1025. This causes the subsequent remaining space calculation
sizeof(buf) - buf_used to underflow.
Use sub_non_neg() to see if space actually existed, and only
increment the offset if remaning space is present.
Changes includes:
- Use sub_non_neg to check if space exists
- Replacing snprintf with scnprintf to ensure the return value
reflects the actual bytes written into the buffer.
- Only increment buf_used by 1 if space exists
- If a parameterized event uses a built-in perf keyword for its
parameter name (eg, config=?), the lexer parses it as a predefined
term token, which sets term->config to NULL. Add check to use
parse_events__term_type_str() if term->config is NULL.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
---
Changelog:
v2 -> v3:
- Split the scnprintf related changes in separate patch
- Handle the overflow issues and unconditional increment
wrapped around sub_non_neg addressing review comment from Sashiko
tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
index 0b8d58543f17..4b9ade1a4cf9 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
@@ -2129,15 +2129,19 @@ static char *format_alias(char *buf, int len, const struct perf_pmu *pmu,
pr_err("Failure to parse '%s' terms '%s': %d\n",
alias->name, alias->terms, ret);
parse_events_terms__exit(&terms);
- snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
+ scnprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
return buf;
}
- used = snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
+ used = scnprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
list_for_each_entry(term, &terms.terms, list) {
+ const char *name = term->config;
+
+ if (!name)
+ name = parse_events__term_type_str(term->type_term);
if (term->type_val == PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_STR)
- used += snprintf(buf + used, sub_non_neg(len, used),
- ",%s=%s", term->config,
+ used += scnprintf(buf + used, sub_non_neg(len, used),
+ ",%s=%s", name,
term->val.str);
}
parse_events_terms__exit(&terms);
@@ -2201,6 +2205,7 @@ int perf_pmu__for_each_event(struct perf_pmu *pmu, bool skip_duplicate_pmus,
int ret = 0;
struct hashmap_entry *entry;
size_t bkt;
+ size_t size_rem, len;
if (perf_pmu__is_tracepoint(pmu))
return tp_pmu__for_each_event(pmu, state, cb);
@@ -2234,17 +2239,36 @@ int perf_pmu__for_each_event(struct perf_pmu *pmu, bool skip_duplicate_pmus,
}
buf_used = strlen(buf) + 1;
}
+
info.scale_unit = NULL;
if (strlen(event->unit) || event->scale != 1.0) {
- info.scale_unit = buf + buf_used;
- buf_used += snprintf(buf + buf_used, sizeof(buf) - buf_used,
- "%G%s", event->scale, event->unit) + 1;
+ /* Check the remaining space */
+ size_rem = sub_non_neg(sizeof(buf), buf_used);
+
+ if (size_rem > 0) {
+ info.scale_unit = buf + buf_used;
+ len = scnprintf(buf + buf_used, size_rem, "%G%s",
+ event->scale, event->unit);
+ /*
+ * Increment buf_used by 1 only if
+ * it fits remaining space
+ */
+ buf_used += min(len + 1, size_rem);
+ }
}
info.desc = event->desc;
info.long_desc = event->long_desc;
- info.encoding_desc = buf + buf_used;
- buf_used += snprintf(buf + buf_used, sizeof(buf) - buf_used,
- "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, info.pmu_name, event->terms) + 1;
+ info.encoding_desc = NULL;
+
+ /* Check the remaining space */
+ size_rem = sub_non_neg(sizeof(buf), buf_used);
+ if (size_rem > 0) {
+ info.encoding_desc = buf + buf_used;
+ len = scnprintf(buf + buf_used, size_rem, "%.*s/%s/",
+ (int)pmu_name_len, info.pmu_name, event->terms);
+ buf_used += min(len + 1, size_rem);
+ }
+
info.str = event->terms;
info.topic = event->topic;
info.deprecated = perf_pmu_alias__check_deprecated(pmu, event);
@@ -2254,7 +2278,7 @@ int perf_pmu__for_each_event(struct perf_pmu *pmu, bool skip_duplicate_pmus,
}
if (pmu->selectable) {
info.name = buf;
- snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s//", pmu->name);
+ scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s//", pmu->name);
info.alias = NULL;
info.scale_unit = NULL;
info.desc = NULL;
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term
2026-05-04 15:42 [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Athira Rajeev
2026-05-04 15:42 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] tools/perf: Use scnprintf in buffer offset calculations Athira Rajeev
@ 2026-05-12 8:52 ` Venkat
2026-05-13 0:57 ` Ian Rogers
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Venkat @ 2026-05-12 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: acme, jolsa, adrian.hunter, mpetlan, tmricht, maddy, irogers,
namhyung, linux-perf-users, linuxppc-dev, hbathini, Tejas.Manhas1,
Tanushree.Shah, shivani
> On 4 May 2026, at 9:12 PM, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> The format_alias() function in util/pmu.c has a check to
> detect whether the event has parameterized field ( =? ).
> The string alias->terms contains the event and if the event
> has user configurable parameter, there will be presence of
> sub string "=?" in the alias->terms.
>
> Snippet of code:
>
> /* Paramemterized events have the parameters shown. */
> if (strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
> /* No parameters. */
> snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
>
> if "strstr" contains the substring, it returns a pointer
> and hence enters the above check which is not the expected
> check. And hence "perf list" doesn't have the parameterized
> fields in the result.
>
> Fix this check to use:
>
> if (!strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
>
> With this change, perf list shows the events correctly with
> the strings showing parameters.
>
> Before the fix:
>
> # ./perf list|grep -w PM_PAU_CYC
> hv_24x7/PM_PAU_CYC/ [Kernel PMU event]
>
> With this fix:
>
> # ./perf list|grep -w PM_PAU_CYC
> hv_24x7/PM_PAU_CYC,chip=?/ [Kernel PMU event]
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v3 -> v4:
> Updated commit message to show real example
> addressing review comment from Namhyung.
>
> v2 -> v3:
> Split the strstr correction in a single patch
>
> tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> index 23337d2fa281..0b8d58543f17 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> @@ -2117,7 +2117,7 @@ static char *format_alias(char *buf, int len, const struct perf_pmu *pmu,
> skip_duplicate_pmus);
>
> /* Paramemterized events have the parameters shown. */
> - if (strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
> + if (!strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
> /* No parameters. */
> snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
> return buf;
> --
> 2.47.3
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term
2026-05-12 8:52 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Venkat
@ 2026-05-13 0:57 ` Ian Rogers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ian Rogers @ 2026-05-13 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Venkat
Cc: Athira Rajeev, acme, jolsa, adrian.hunter, mpetlan, tmricht,
maddy, namhyung, linux-perf-users, linuxppc-dev, hbathini,
Tejas.Manhas1, Tanushree.Shah, shivani
On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 1:53 AM Venkat <venkat88@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 4 May 2026, at 9:12 PM, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > The format_alias() function in util/pmu.c has a check to
> > detect whether the event has parameterized field ( =? ).
> > The string alias->terms contains the event and if the event
> > has user configurable parameter, there will be presence of
> > sub string "=?" in the alias->terms.
> >
> > Snippet of code:
> >
> > /* Paramemterized events have the parameters shown. */
> > if (strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
> > /* No parameters. */
> > snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
> >
> > if "strstr" contains the substring, it returns a pointer
> > and hence enters the above check which is not the expected
> > check. And hence "perf list" doesn't have the parameterized
> > fields in the result.
> >
> > Fix this check to use:
> >
> > if (!strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
> >
> > With this change, perf list shows the events correctly with
> > the strings showing parameters.
> >
> > Before the fix:
> >
> > # ./perf list|grep -w PM_PAU_CYC
> > hv_24x7/PM_PAU_CYC/ [Kernel PMU event]
> >
> > With this fix:
> >
> > # ./perf list|grep -w PM_PAU_CYC
> > hv_24x7/PM_PAU_CYC,chip=?/ [Kernel PMU event]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Thanks,
Ian
> > ---
> > Changelog:
> > v3 -> v4:
> > Updated commit message to show real example
> > addressing review comment from Namhyung.
> >
> > v2 -> v3:
> > Split the strstr correction in a single patch
> >
> > tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> > index 23337d2fa281..0b8d58543f17 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> > @@ -2117,7 +2117,7 @@ static char *format_alias(char *buf, int len, const struct perf_pmu *pmu,
> > skip_duplicate_pmus);
> >
> > /* Paramemterized events have the parameters shown. */
> > - if (strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
> > + if (!strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
> > /* No parameters. */
> > snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
> > return buf;
> > --
> > 2.47.3
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] tools/perf: Use scnprintf in buffer offset calculations
2026-05-04 15:42 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] tools/perf: Use scnprintf in buffer offset calculations Athira Rajeev
@ 2026-05-13 1:02 ` Ian Rogers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ian Rogers @ 2026-05-13 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: acme, jolsa, adrian.hunter, mpetlan, tmricht, maddy, namhyung,
linux-perf-users, linuxppc-dev, hbathini, Tejas.Manhas1,
Tanushree.Shah, shivani
On Mon, May 4, 2026 at 8:42 AM Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Replace snprintf with scnprintf in buffer offset calculations to
> ensure the 'used' count will not exceed the "len".
>
> The current logic in perf_pmu__for_each_event uses an unconditional
> + 1 increment to buf_used to account for null terminators. This can
> cause a a stack buffer overflow in the subsequent scnprintf call.
> When the local stack buffer buf (1024 bytes) is full, buf_used can
> reach 1025. This causes the subsequent remaining space calculation
> sizeof(buf) - buf_used to underflow.
>
> Use sub_non_neg() to see if space actually existed, and only
> increment the offset if remaning space is present.
>
> Changes includes:
> - Use sub_non_neg to check if space exists
> - Replacing snprintf with scnprintf to ensure the return value
> reflects the actual bytes written into the buffer.
> - Only increment buf_used by 1 if space exists
> - If a parameterized event uses a built-in perf keyword for its
> parameter name (eg, config=?), the lexer parses it as a predefined
> term token, which sets term->config to NULL. Add check to use
> parse_events__term_type_str() if term->config is NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Thanks,
Ian
> ---
> Changelog:
> v2 -> v3:
> - Split the scnprintf related changes in separate patch
> - Handle the overflow issues and unconditional increment
> wrapped around sub_non_neg addressing review comment from Sashiko
>
> tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> index 0b8d58543f17..4b9ade1a4cf9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> @@ -2129,15 +2129,19 @@ static char *format_alias(char *buf, int len, const struct perf_pmu *pmu,
> pr_err("Failure to parse '%s' terms '%s': %d\n",
> alias->name, alias->terms, ret);
> parse_events_terms__exit(&terms);
> - snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
> + scnprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
> return buf;
> }
> - used = snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
> + used = scnprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
>
> list_for_each_entry(term, &terms.terms, list) {
> + const char *name = term->config;
> +
> + if (!name)
> + name = parse_events__term_type_str(term->type_term);
> if (term->type_val == PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_STR)
> - used += snprintf(buf + used, sub_non_neg(len, used),
> - ",%s=%s", term->config,
> + used += scnprintf(buf + used, sub_non_neg(len, used),
> + ",%s=%s", name,
> term->val.str);
> }
> parse_events_terms__exit(&terms);
> @@ -2201,6 +2205,7 @@ int perf_pmu__for_each_event(struct perf_pmu *pmu, bool skip_duplicate_pmus,
> int ret = 0;
> struct hashmap_entry *entry;
> size_t bkt;
> + size_t size_rem, len;
>
> if (perf_pmu__is_tracepoint(pmu))
> return tp_pmu__for_each_event(pmu, state, cb);
> @@ -2234,17 +2239,36 @@ int perf_pmu__for_each_event(struct perf_pmu *pmu, bool skip_duplicate_pmus,
> }
> buf_used = strlen(buf) + 1;
> }
> +
> info.scale_unit = NULL;
> if (strlen(event->unit) || event->scale != 1.0) {
> - info.scale_unit = buf + buf_used;
> - buf_used += snprintf(buf + buf_used, sizeof(buf) - buf_used,
> - "%G%s", event->scale, event->unit) + 1;
> + /* Check the remaining space */
> + size_rem = sub_non_neg(sizeof(buf), buf_used);
> +
> + if (size_rem > 0) {
> + info.scale_unit = buf + buf_used;
> + len = scnprintf(buf + buf_used, size_rem, "%G%s",
> + event->scale, event->unit);
> + /*
> + * Increment buf_used by 1 only if
> + * it fits remaining space
> + */
> + buf_used += min(len + 1, size_rem);
> + }
> }
> info.desc = event->desc;
> info.long_desc = event->long_desc;
> - info.encoding_desc = buf + buf_used;
> - buf_used += snprintf(buf + buf_used, sizeof(buf) - buf_used,
> - "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, info.pmu_name, event->terms) + 1;
> + info.encoding_desc = NULL;
> +
> + /* Check the remaining space */
> + size_rem = sub_non_neg(sizeof(buf), buf_used);
> + if (size_rem > 0) {
> + info.encoding_desc = buf + buf_used;
> + len = scnprintf(buf + buf_used, size_rem, "%.*s/%s/",
> + (int)pmu_name_len, info.pmu_name, event->terms);
> + buf_used += min(len + 1, size_rem);
> + }
> +
> info.str = event->terms;
> info.topic = event->topic;
> info.deprecated = perf_pmu_alias__check_deprecated(pmu, event);
> @@ -2254,7 +2278,7 @@ int perf_pmu__for_each_event(struct perf_pmu *pmu, bool skip_duplicate_pmus,
> }
> if (pmu->selectable) {
> info.name = buf;
> - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s//", pmu->name);
> + scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s//", pmu->name);
> info.alias = NULL;
> info.scale_unit = NULL;
> info.desc = NULL;
> --
> 2.47.3
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-13 1:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-04 15:42 [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Athira Rajeev
2026-05-04 15:42 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] tools/perf: Use scnprintf in buffer offset calculations Athira Rajeev
2026-05-13 1:02 ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-12 8:52 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Venkat
2026-05-13 0:57 ` Ian Rogers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox