* [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term
@ 2026-05-04 15:42 Athira Rajeev
2026-05-04 15:42 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] tools/perf: Use scnprintf in buffer offset calculations Athira Rajeev
2026-05-12 8:52 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Venkat
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2026-05-04 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acme, jolsa, adrian.hunter, mpetlan, tmricht, maddy, irogers,
namhyung
Cc: linux-perf-users, linuxppc-dev, atrajeev, hbathini, Tejas.Manhas1,
Tanushree.Shah, shivani
The format_alias() function in util/pmu.c has a check to
detect whether the event has parameterized field ( =? ).
The string alias->terms contains the event and if the event
has user configurable parameter, there will be presence of
sub string "=?" in the alias->terms.
Snippet of code:
/* Paramemterized events have the parameters shown. */
if (strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
/* No parameters. */
snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
if "strstr" contains the substring, it returns a pointer
and hence enters the above check which is not the expected
check. And hence "perf list" doesn't have the parameterized
fields in the result.
Fix this check to use:
if (!strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
With this change, perf list shows the events correctly with
the strings showing parameters.
Before the fix:
# ./perf list|grep -w PM_PAU_CYC
hv_24x7/PM_PAU_CYC/ [Kernel PMU event]
With this fix:
# ./perf list|grep -w PM_PAU_CYC
hv_24x7/PM_PAU_CYC,chip=?/ [Kernel PMU event]
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
---
Changelog:
v3 -> v4:
Updated commit message to show real example
addressing review comment from Namhyung.
v2 -> v3:
Split the strstr correction in a single patch
tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
index 23337d2fa281..0b8d58543f17 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
@@ -2117,7 +2117,7 @@ static char *format_alias(char *buf, int len, const struct perf_pmu *pmu,
skip_duplicate_pmus);
/* Paramemterized events have the parameters shown. */
- if (strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
+ if (!strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
/* No parameters. */
snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
return buf;
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH V4 2/2] tools/perf: Use scnprintf in buffer offset calculations 2026-05-04 15:42 [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Athira Rajeev @ 2026-05-04 15:42 ` Athira Rajeev 2026-05-13 1:02 ` Ian Rogers 2026-05-12 8:52 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Venkat 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Athira Rajeev @ 2026-05-04 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: acme, jolsa, adrian.hunter, mpetlan, tmricht, maddy, irogers, namhyung Cc: linux-perf-users, linuxppc-dev, atrajeev, hbathini, Tejas.Manhas1, Tanushree.Shah, shivani Replace snprintf with scnprintf in buffer offset calculations to ensure the 'used' count will not exceed the "len". The current logic in perf_pmu__for_each_event uses an unconditional + 1 increment to buf_used to account for null terminators. This can cause a a stack buffer overflow in the subsequent scnprintf call. When the local stack buffer buf (1024 bytes) is full, buf_used can reach 1025. This causes the subsequent remaining space calculation sizeof(buf) - buf_used to underflow. Use sub_non_neg() to see if space actually existed, and only increment the offset if remaning space is present. Changes includes: - Use sub_non_neg to check if space exists - Replacing snprintf with scnprintf to ensure the return value reflects the actual bytes written into the buffer. - Only increment buf_used by 1 if space exists - If a parameterized event uses a built-in perf keyword for its parameter name (eg, config=?), the lexer parses it as a predefined term token, which sets term->config to NULL. Add check to use parse_events__term_type_str() if term->config is NULL. Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com> --- Changelog: v2 -> v3: - Split the scnprintf related changes in separate patch - Handle the overflow issues and unconditional increment wrapped around sub_non_neg addressing review comment from Sashiko tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c index 0b8d58543f17..4b9ade1a4cf9 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c @@ -2129,15 +2129,19 @@ static char *format_alias(char *buf, int len, const struct perf_pmu *pmu, pr_err("Failure to parse '%s' terms '%s': %d\n", alias->name, alias->terms, ret); parse_events_terms__exit(&terms); - snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name); + scnprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name); return buf; } - used = snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name); + used = scnprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name); list_for_each_entry(term, &terms.terms, list) { + const char *name = term->config; + + if (!name) + name = parse_events__term_type_str(term->type_term); if (term->type_val == PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_STR) - used += snprintf(buf + used, sub_non_neg(len, used), - ",%s=%s", term->config, + used += scnprintf(buf + used, sub_non_neg(len, used), + ",%s=%s", name, term->val.str); } parse_events_terms__exit(&terms); @@ -2201,6 +2205,7 @@ int perf_pmu__for_each_event(struct perf_pmu *pmu, bool skip_duplicate_pmus, int ret = 0; struct hashmap_entry *entry; size_t bkt; + size_t size_rem, len; if (perf_pmu__is_tracepoint(pmu)) return tp_pmu__for_each_event(pmu, state, cb); @@ -2234,17 +2239,36 @@ int perf_pmu__for_each_event(struct perf_pmu *pmu, bool skip_duplicate_pmus, } buf_used = strlen(buf) + 1; } + info.scale_unit = NULL; if (strlen(event->unit) || event->scale != 1.0) { - info.scale_unit = buf + buf_used; - buf_used += snprintf(buf + buf_used, sizeof(buf) - buf_used, - "%G%s", event->scale, event->unit) + 1; + /* Check the remaining space */ + size_rem = sub_non_neg(sizeof(buf), buf_used); + + if (size_rem > 0) { + info.scale_unit = buf + buf_used; + len = scnprintf(buf + buf_used, size_rem, "%G%s", + event->scale, event->unit); + /* + * Increment buf_used by 1 only if + * it fits remaining space + */ + buf_used += min(len + 1, size_rem); + } } info.desc = event->desc; info.long_desc = event->long_desc; - info.encoding_desc = buf + buf_used; - buf_used += snprintf(buf + buf_used, sizeof(buf) - buf_used, - "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, info.pmu_name, event->terms) + 1; + info.encoding_desc = NULL; + + /* Check the remaining space */ + size_rem = sub_non_neg(sizeof(buf), buf_used); + if (size_rem > 0) { + info.encoding_desc = buf + buf_used; + len = scnprintf(buf + buf_used, size_rem, "%.*s/%s/", + (int)pmu_name_len, info.pmu_name, event->terms); + buf_used += min(len + 1, size_rem); + } + info.str = event->terms; info.topic = event->topic; info.deprecated = perf_pmu_alias__check_deprecated(pmu, event); @@ -2254,7 +2278,7 @@ int perf_pmu__for_each_event(struct perf_pmu *pmu, bool skip_duplicate_pmus, } if (pmu->selectable) { info.name = buf; - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s//", pmu->name); + scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s//", pmu->name); info.alias = NULL; info.scale_unit = NULL; info.desc = NULL; -- 2.47.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] tools/perf: Use scnprintf in buffer offset calculations 2026-05-04 15:42 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] tools/perf: Use scnprintf in buffer offset calculations Athira Rajeev @ 2026-05-13 1:02 ` Ian Rogers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Ian Rogers @ 2026-05-13 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Athira Rajeev Cc: acme, jolsa, adrian.hunter, mpetlan, tmricht, maddy, namhyung, linux-perf-users, linuxppc-dev, hbathini, Tejas.Manhas1, Tanushree.Shah, shivani On Mon, May 4, 2026 at 8:42 AM Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > Replace snprintf with scnprintf in buffer offset calculations to > ensure the 'used' count will not exceed the "len". > > The current logic in perf_pmu__for_each_event uses an unconditional > + 1 increment to buf_used to account for null terminators. This can > cause a a stack buffer overflow in the subsequent scnprintf call. > When the local stack buffer buf (1024 bytes) is full, buf_used can > reach 1025. This causes the subsequent remaining space calculation > sizeof(buf) - buf_used to underflow. > > Use sub_non_neg() to see if space actually existed, and only > increment the offset if remaning space is present. > > Changes includes: > - Use sub_non_neg to check if space exists > - Replacing snprintf with scnprintf to ensure the return value > reflects the actual bytes written into the buffer. > - Only increment buf_used by 1 if space exists > - If a parameterized event uses a built-in perf keyword for its > parameter name (eg, config=?), the lexer parses it as a predefined > term token, which sets term->config to NULL. Add check to use > parse_events__term_type_str() if term->config is NULL. > > Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Thanks, Ian > --- > Changelog: > v2 -> v3: > - Split the scnprintf related changes in separate patch > - Handle the overflow issues and unconditional increment > wrapped around sub_non_neg addressing review comment from Sashiko > > tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c > index 0b8d58543f17..4b9ade1a4cf9 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c > @@ -2129,15 +2129,19 @@ static char *format_alias(char *buf, int len, const struct perf_pmu *pmu, > pr_err("Failure to parse '%s' terms '%s': %d\n", > alias->name, alias->terms, ret); > parse_events_terms__exit(&terms); > - snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name); > + scnprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name); > return buf; > } > - used = snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name); > + used = scnprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name); > > list_for_each_entry(term, &terms.terms, list) { > + const char *name = term->config; > + > + if (!name) > + name = parse_events__term_type_str(term->type_term); > if (term->type_val == PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_STR) > - used += snprintf(buf + used, sub_non_neg(len, used), > - ",%s=%s", term->config, > + used += scnprintf(buf + used, sub_non_neg(len, used), > + ",%s=%s", name, > term->val.str); > } > parse_events_terms__exit(&terms); > @@ -2201,6 +2205,7 @@ int perf_pmu__for_each_event(struct perf_pmu *pmu, bool skip_duplicate_pmus, > int ret = 0; > struct hashmap_entry *entry; > size_t bkt; > + size_t size_rem, len; > > if (perf_pmu__is_tracepoint(pmu)) > return tp_pmu__for_each_event(pmu, state, cb); > @@ -2234,17 +2239,36 @@ int perf_pmu__for_each_event(struct perf_pmu *pmu, bool skip_duplicate_pmus, > } > buf_used = strlen(buf) + 1; > } > + > info.scale_unit = NULL; > if (strlen(event->unit) || event->scale != 1.0) { > - info.scale_unit = buf + buf_used; > - buf_used += snprintf(buf + buf_used, sizeof(buf) - buf_used, > - "%G%s", event->scale, event->unit) + 1; > + /* Check the remaining space */ > + size_rem = sub_non_neg(sizeof(buf), buf_used); > + > + if (size_rem > 0) { > + info.scale_unit = buf + buf_used; > + len = scnprintf(buf + buf_used, size_rem, "%G%s", > + event->scale, event->unit); > + /* > + * Increment buf_used by 1 only if > + * it fits remaining space > + */ > + buf_used += min(len + 1, size_rem); > + } > } > info.desc = event->desc; > info.long_desc = event->long_desc; > - info.encoding_desc = buf + buf_used; > - buf_used += snprintf(buf + buf_used, sizeof(buf) - buf_used, > - "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, info.pmu_name, event->terms) + 1; > + info.encoding_desc = NULL; > + > + /* Check the remaining space */ > + size_rem = sub_non_neg(sizeof(buf), buf_used); > + if (size_rem > 0) { > + info.encoding_desc = buf + buf_used; > + len = scnprintf(buf + buf_used, size_rem, "%.*s/%s/", > + (int)pmu_name_len, info.pmu_name, event->terms); > + buf_used += min(len + 1, size_rem); > + } > + > info.str = event->terms; > info.topic = event->topic; > info.deprecated = perf_pmu_alias__check_deprecated(pmu, event); > @@ -2254,7 +2278,7 @@ int perf_pmu__for_each_event(struct perf_pmu *pmu, bool skip_duplicate_pmus, > } > if (pmu->selectable) { > info.name = buf; > - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s//", pmu->name); > + scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s//", pmu->name); > info.alias = NULL; > info.scale_unit = NULL; > info.desc = NULL; > -- > 2.47.3 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term 2026-05-04 15:42 [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Athira Rajeev 2026-05-04 15:42 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] tools/perf: Use scnprintf in buffer offset calculations Athira Rajeev @ 2026-05-12 8:52 ` Venkat 2026-05-13 0:57 ` Ian Rogers 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Venkat @ 2026-05-12 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Athira Rajeev Cc: acme, jolsa, adrian.hunter, mpetlan, tmricht, maddy, irogers, namhyung, linux-perf-users, linuxppc-dev, hbathini, Tejas.Manhas1, Tanushree.Shah, shivani > On 4 May 2026, at 9:12 PM, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > The format_alias() function in util/pmu.c has a check to > detect whether the event has parameterized field ( =? ). > The string alias->terms contains the event and if the event > has user configurable parameter, there will be presence of > sub string "=?" in the alias->terms. > > Snippet of code: > > /* Paramemterized events have the parameters shown. */ > if (strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) { > /* No parameters. */ > snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name); > > if "strstr" contains the substring, it returns a pointer > and hence enters the above check which is not the expected > check. And hence "perf list" doesn't have the parameterized > fields in the result. > > Fix this check to use: > > if (!strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) { > > With this change, perf list shows the events correctly with > the strings showing parameters. > > Before the fix: > > # ./perf list|grep -w PM_PAU_CYC > hv_24x7/PM_PAU_CYC/ [Kernel PMU event] > > With this fix: > > # ./perf list|grep -w PM_PAU_CYC > hv_24x7/PM_PAU_CYC,chip=?/ [Kernel PMU event] > > Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com> > --- > Changelog: > v3 -> v4: > Updated commit message to show real example > addressing review comment from Namhyung. > > v2 -> v3: > Split the strstr correction in a single patch > > tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c > index 23337d2fa281..0b8d58543f17 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c > @@ -2117,7 +2117,7 @@ static char *format_alias(char *buf, int len, const struct perf_pmu *pmu, > skip_duplicate_pmus); > > /* Paramemterized events have the parameters shown. */ > - if (strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) { > + if (!strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) { > /* No parameters. */ > snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name); > return buf; > -- > 2.47.3 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term 2026-05-12 8:52 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Venkat @ 2026-05-13 0:57 ` Ian Rogers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Ian Rogers @ 2026-05-13 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Venkat Cc: Athira Rajeev, acme, jolsa, adrian.hunter, mpetlan, tmricht, maddy, namhyung, linux-perf-users, linuxppc-dev, hbathini, Tejas.Manhas1, Tanushree.Shah, shivani On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 1:53 AM Venkat <venkat88@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > On 4 May 2026, at 9:12 PM, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > The format_alias() function in util/pmu.c has a check to > > detect whether the event has parameterized field ( =? ). > > The string alias->terms contains the event and if the event > > has user configurable parameter, there will be presence of > > sub string "=?" in the alias->terms. > > > > Snippet of code: > > > > /* Paramemterized events have the parameters shown. */ > > if (strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) { > > /* No parameters. */ > > snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name); > > > > if "strstr" contains the substring, it returns a pointer > > and hence enters the above check which is not the expected > > check. And hence "perf list" doesn't have the parameterized > > fields in the result. > > > > Fix this check to use: > > > > if (!strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) { > > > > With this change, perf list shows the events correctly with > > the strings showing parameters. > > > > Before the fix: > > > > # ./perf list|grep -w PM_PAU_CYC > > hv_24x7/PM_PAU_CYC/ [Kernel PMU event] > > > > With this fix: > > > > # ./perf list|grep -w PM_PAU_CYC > > hv_24x7/PM_PAU_CYC,chip=?/ [Kernel PMU event] > > > > Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com> > > Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Thanks, Ian > > --- > > Changelog: > > v3 -> v4: > > Updated commit message to show real example > > addressing review comment from Namhyung. > > > > v2 -> v3: > > Split the strstr correction in a single patch > > > > tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c > > index 23337d2fa281..0b8d58543f17 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c > > @@ -2117,7 +2117,7 @@ static char *format_alias(char *buf, int len, const struct perf_pmu *pmu, > > skip_duplicate_pmus); > > > > /* Paramemterized events have the parameters shown. */ > > - if (strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) { > > + if (!strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) { > > /* No parameters. */ > > snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name); > > return buf; > > -- > > 2.47.3 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-13 1:03 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-05-04 15:42 [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Athira Rajeev 2026-05-04 15:42 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] tools/perf: Use scnprintf in buffer offset calculations Athira Rajeev 2026-05-13 1:02 ` Ian Rogers 2026-05-12 8:52 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Venkat 2026-05-13 0:57 ` Ian Rogers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox