Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term
@ 2026-05-04 15:42 Athira Rajeev
  2026-05-04 15:42 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] tools/perf: Use scnprintf in buffer offset calculations Athira Rajeev
  2026-05-12  8:52 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Venkat
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2026-05-04 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: acme, jolsa, adrian.hunter, mpetlan, tmricht, maddy, irogers,
	namhyung
  Cc: linux-perf-users, linuxppc-dev, atrajeev, hbathini, Tejas.Manhas1,
	Tanushree.Shah, shivani

The format_alias() function in util/pmu.c has a check to
detect whether the event has parameterized field ( =? ).
The string alias->terms contains the event and if the event
has user configurable parameter, there will be presence of
sub string "=?" in the alias->terms.

Snippet of code:

 /* Paramemterized events have the parameters shown. */
       if (strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
               /* No parameters. */
               snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);

if "strstr" contains the substring, it returns a pointer
and hence enters the above check which is not the expected
check. And hence "perf list" doesn't have the parameterized
fields in the result.

Fix this check to use:

if (!strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {

With this change, perf list shows the events correctly with
the strings showing parameters.

Before the fix:

 # ./perf list|grep -w PM_PAU_CYC
  hv_24x7/PM_PAU_CYC/                                [Kernel PMU event]

With this fix:

 # ./perf list|grep -w PM_PAU_CYC
  hv_24x7/PM_PAU_CYC,chip=?/                         [Kernel PMU event]

Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
---
Changelog:
v3 -> v4:
Updated commit message to show real example
addressing review comment from Namhyung.

v2 -> v3:
Split the strstr correction in a single patch

 tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
index 23337d2fa281..0b8d58543f17 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
@@ -2117,7 +2117,7 @@ static char *format_alias(char *buf, int len, const struct perf_pmu *pmu,
 						   skip_duplicate_pmus);
 
 	/* Paramemterized events have the parameters shown. */
-	if (strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
+	if (!strstr(alias->terms, "=?")) {
 		/* No parameters. */
 		snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s/", (int)pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
 		return buf;
-- 
2.47.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-13  1:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-04 15:42 [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Athira Rajeev
2026-05-04 15:42 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] tools/perf: Use scnprintf in buffer offset calculations Athira Rajeev
2026-05-13  1:02   ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-12  8:52 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] tools/perf: Fix the check for parameterized field in event term Venkat
2026-05-13  0:57   ` Ian Rogers

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox