From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf build: Add make check-headers target
Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 19:33:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260504193335.81BD0C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260503193137.27465-6-namhyung@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `tools/include/uapi/README` documentation was not updated to reflect the removal of the automated header synchronization check.
- [Low] The new `check-headers` target in `tools/perf/Makefile` is missing a `.PHONY` declaration.
--
commit dd1cd2c298920f9790f61d618060d62047bed876
Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
perf build: Add make check-headers target
This commit removes the automated check-headers.sh script execution from
the default perf build and adds a dedicated check-headers Make target to
be called manually instead.
> As it's to improve perf trace beautifier to catch up new changes mostly
> in UAPIs, we can make it a separate build target and call it
> occasionally.
Does this change require an update to tools/include/uapi/README?
The README currently documents a "software-enforced copy-on-write mechanism"
that is "driven by non-fatal warnings on the tooling side build."
Since this is no longer automated during routine builds, developers might miss
UAPI changes if they rely on the currently documented behavior.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile b/tools/perf/Makefile
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
[ ... ]
> @@ -111,6 +111,9 @@ build-test:
> build-test-tarball:
> @$(MAKE) -f tests/make REUSE_FEATURES_DUMP=1 MK=Makefile SET_PARALLEL=1 --no-print-directory out
>
> +check-headers:
> + @./check-headers.sh
> +
Should check-headers be added to the .PHONY declarations?
Since check-headers is a command target and does not produce an artifact by
that name, if a file or directory named check-headers is ever created in
tools/perf/, Make will consider the target up to date and silently skip
executing the script.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260503193137.27465-1-namhyung@kernel.org?part=5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-03 19:31 [PATCH 0/5] perf build: Update kernel headers Namhyung Kim
2026-05-03 19:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf trace: Sync linux/socket.h with the kernel source Namhyung Kim
2026-05-03 19:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf trace: Sync uapi/linux/fs.h " Namhyung Kim
2026-05-03 19:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf trace: Sync uapi/linux/mount.h " Namhyung Kim
2026-05-04 19:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 19:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf trace: Sync uapi/linux/sched.h " Namhyung Kim
2026-05-04 19:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 19:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf build: Add make check-headers target Namhyung Kim
2026-05-04 19:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260504193335.81BD0C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox