From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>, Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 1/8] perf/x86/intel: Remove anythread_deprecated bit from perf_capabilities
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:43:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630094312.GA751831@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27d77639-a948-4f0f-8cb5-1d06966bac0f@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 05:14:41PM +0800, Mi, Dapeng wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Could you please queue above latest v4 patchset
> (https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260616044654.3468742-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com/)
> which fixes a defect in patch 5/8 "perf/x86/intel: Validate the return
> value of intel_pmu_init_hybrid()"?
>
Damn, I knew I was forgetting something :-(
Let me go fix that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 9:01 [Patch v3 0/8] perf/x86: Miscellaneous PMU bug fixes Dapeng Mi
2026-06-12 9:01 ` [Patch v3 1/8] perf/x86/intel: Remove anythread_deprecated bit from perf_capabilities Dapeng Mi
2026-06-12 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-15 0:59 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-15 3:28 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-16 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-17 0:14 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-30 9:14 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-30 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-06-30 9:44 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-12 9:01 ` [Patch v3 2/8] perf/x86/intel: Keep cap_user_rdpmc in sync with RDPMC user-disable state Dapeng Mi
2026-06-12 9:01 ` [Patch v3 3/8] perf/x86/intel: Fallback to sw branch type decoding if no hw decoding Dapeng Mi
2026-06-12 9:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 1:00 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-15 1:03 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-12 9:01 ` [Patch v3 4/8] perf/x86/intel: Fix kernel address leakages in LBR stack Dapeng Mi
2026-06-12 9:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 1:01 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-12 9:01 ` [Patch v3 5/8] perf/x86/intel: Validate the return value of intel_pmu_init_hybrid() Dapeng Mi
2026-06-12 9:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 1:08 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-12 9:01 ` [Patch v3 6/8] perf/x86/intel: Drop fixed-counter PEBS constraints for baseline PEBS Dapeng Mi
2026-06-12 9:01 ` [Patch v3 7/8] perf/core: Fix kernel register info leak via hardware skid Dapeng Mi
2026-06-12 9:01 ` [Patch v3 8/8] perf/core: Check kernel access when kernel callchains are requested Dapeng Mi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260630094312.GA751831@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox