From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 09/19] ptwrite uprobes: Factor file-backed instruction reads
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 19:45:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831194547.906771F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831150651.1134594-10-ak@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] copy_insn() unconditionally returns -EIO for partial reads, breaking uprobes placed near the end of an executable.
--
commit 357913ae591e42b1fd264a2ff741868c174c2724
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@kernel.org>
ptwrite uprobes: Factor file-backed instruction reads
This commit refactors copy_insn() into a more generic uprobe_copy_from_file()
function. The existing copy_insn() is updated to use this generic version,
which is intended to be used by later patches.
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 23202df2b51ae..20fa16ed85198 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
[ ... ]
> +int uprobe_copy_from_file(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
> + loff_t offset, void *buf, int size)
> {
[ ... ]
> + while (copied < size) {
> + file_size = i_size_read(inode);
> + if (offset >= file_size)
> break;
>
> - len = min_t(int, size, PAGE_SIZE - (offs & ~PAGE_MASK));
> - err = __copy_insn(mapping, filp, insn, len, offs);
> + len = min_t(loff_t, size - copied, file_size - offset);
[ ... ]
> +static int copy_insn(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct file *filp)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = uprobe_copy_from_file(uprobe->inode, filp, uprobe->offset,
> + &uprobe->arch.insn,
> + sizeof(uprobe->arch.insn));
> + return ret < 0 ? ret : ret == sizeof(uprobe->arch.insn) ? 0 : -EIO;
[Severity: High]
Does this unconditionally return -EIO for partial reads near the end of the
file?
When registering a uprobe on a target file where the instruction offset is
close to the end of the file (where file_size - offset is smaller than
sizeof(uprobe->arch.insn)), uprobe_copy_from_file() will stop at the file
boundary and return a byte count strictly less than the requested size.
The original copy_insn() loop stopped reading at EOF but still returned 0 as
long as no explicit error occurred, allowing partial reads to succeed.
By enforcing a strict ret == sizeof(...) check here, will this fail uprobe
registration for valid instructions that happen to reside near the end of small
binaries or scripts?
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831150651.1134594-1-ak@kernel.org?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 15:04 [RFC] ptwrite uprobes Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 01/19] uprobes: guard trace cleanup against error pointers Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 18:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 0:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 02/19] uprobes: Correctly reject anonymous VMAs for breakpoint installation Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 18:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 03/19] uprobes: Print warning for missing breakpoint install Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 18:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 04/19] ptwrite uprobes: Add infrastructure for ptwrite uprobes Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 18:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 05/19] ptwrite uprobes: Add minimal low level support for x86 Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 19:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 16:35 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 06/19] ptwrite uprobes: Add a sample module to exercise interface Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 19:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 07/19] ptwrite uprobes: Add support to tracing infrastructure Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 19:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 08/19] ptwrite uprobes / x86: Add a user fault notifier chain Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 19:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 09/19] ptwrite uprobes: Factor file-backed instruction reads Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 19:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 10/19] ptwrite uprobes: Minimal memory references and fault handling Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 19:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 11/19] ptwrite uprobes: Add multinop support Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 20:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 12/19] ptwrite uprobes: Add pacing to the probes Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 20:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 13/19] ptwrite uprobes: Support instruction puning Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 20:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 14/19] ptwrite uprobes: Use atomic patching for multinop sites Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 21:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 15/19] ptwrite uprobes: Add a tutorial and overview documentation Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 21:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 16/19] ptwrite uprobes / perf tools pt: Improve FUP error handling for ptwrite Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 21:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 17/19] ptwrite uprobes / perf tools probe: Add support of ptwrite probes Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 21:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 18/19] ptwrite uprobes / perf tools script: Add ptwrite uprobes decoder Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 21:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 15:04 ` [RFC v1 19/19] ptwrite uprobes: Add self tests Andi Kleen
2026-08-31 21:47 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831194547.906771F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox