Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/9] perf mutex: Add DEFINE_MUTEX() static initializer
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 10:26:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261004102636.4FC701F0089A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261004102133.26392-4-acme@kernel.org>

> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> 
> For file scope mutexes, so that they don't need a constructor function
> to initialize them at startup, mirroring PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER
> while keeping the clang -Wthread-safety annotations of struct mutex.
> 
> DEBUG=1 builds have mutex_init() set PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK, making
> the CHECK_ERR() paths in mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() report relocking a
> held mutex and unlocking one that isn't held.  PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER
> gives a default type mutex, so statically initialized ones would silently
> lose that: use PTHREAD_ERRORCHECK_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP, a glibc
> extension, falling back to the default type in libcs that lack it.
> 
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261004102133.26392-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-04 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-04 10:21 [PATCH v10 0/9] perf tools: Add progress diagnostics and a false-sharing workload Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 1/9] perf config: Move perf_config__set_variable() to util/config.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 2/9] perf config: Make perf_etc_perfconfig() never return NULL Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 3/9] perf mutex: Add DEFINE_MUTEX() static initializer Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:26   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 4/9] perf mutex: Add DO_ONCE() for one-time initialization Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 5/9] perf config: Serialize config file access with a mutex Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 6/9] perf report: Add --progress option Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 7/9] perf report: Add --no-progress option Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 8/9] perf scripts: Add perf-stuck, to tell where a running perf is stuck Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 9/9] perf test: Add false_sharing workload exhibiting cross-CPU false sharing Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:27   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261004102636.4FC701F0089A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox