From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: "Falcon, Thomas" <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
"alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"namhyung@kernel.org" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"Rogers, Ian" <irogers@google.com>,
"Eranian, Stephane" <eranian@google.com>
Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"Chen, Zide" <zide.chen@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mi, Dapeng1" <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
"Hao, Xudong" <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf/x86/intel: Remove anythread_deprecated bit from perf_capabilities
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 09:37:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a2bdb92-11b5-46ab-83a4-9b58e71ca581@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fdb17e042719f77c382cbc47be2def2cda1bf51.camel@intel.com>
On 6/6/2026 1:04 AM, Falcon, Thomas wrote:
> On Fri, 2026-06-05 at 09:11 +0800, Dapeng Mi wrote:
>> AnyThread mode deprecation is enumerated by CPUID.0AH:EDX[15] instead
>> of
>> PERF_CAPABILITIES MSR. It's not a good practice to define a bit to
>> represent "anythread deprecation" in perf_capabilities. It leads to
>> the
>> anythread_deprecated bit could be overwritten by the real value of
>> PERF_CAPABILITIES MSR, just like the below code in update_pmu_cap()
>> does.
>>
>> ```
>> if (!intel_pmu_broken_perf_cap()) {
>> /* Perf Metric (Bit 15) and PEBS via PT (Bit 16) are hybrid
>> enumeration */
>> rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, hybrid(pmu,
>> intel_cap).capabilities);
>> }
>> ```
>>
>> It leads to the anythread_deprecated bit is cleared to 0 and the
>> "any"
>> attribute is incorrectly shown in the /sys/devices/cpu/format/ folder
>> on
>> these support Perfmon v6 platforms, like Clearwater Forest.
>>
>> ```
>> $grep . /sys/devices/cpu/format/*
>> /sys/devices/cpu/format/acr_mask:config2:0-63
>> /sys/devices/cpu/format/any:config:21
>> /sys/devices/cpu/format/cmask:config:24-31
>> ```
>>
>> So remove the anythread_deprecated bit from perf_capabilities
>> structure
>> and directly depends on CPUID.0AH:EDX[15] to judge if anythread is
>> deprecated.
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Reported-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>> Fixes: cadbaa039b99 ("perf/x86/intel: Make anythread filter support
>> conditional")
>> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Original patch link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260423053306.3033331-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com/
>>
>> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 10 +++-------
>> arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> index 0217e701aeeb..ea3ab3050a3b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> @@ -7946,12 +7946,6 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>>
>> x86_add_quirk(intel_arch_events_quirk); /* Install first, so
>> it runs last */
>>
>> - if (version >= 5) {
>> - x86_pmu.intel_cap.anythread_deprecated =
>> edx.split.anythread_deprecated;
>> - if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.anythread_deprecated)
>> - pr_cont(" AnyThread deprecated, ");
>> - }
>> -
>> /* The perf side of core PMU is ready to support the
>> mediated vPMU. */
>> x86_get_pmu(smp_processor_id())->capabilities |=
>> PERF_PMU_CAP_MEDIATED_VPMU;
>>
>> @@ -8828,8 +8822,10 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>> &x86_pmu.intel_ctrl);
>>
>> /* AnyThread may be deprecated on arch perfmon v5 or later
>> */
>> - if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.anythread_deprecated)
>> + if (version >= 5 && edx.split.anythread_deprecated) {
>> x86_pmu.format_attrs = intel_arch_formats_attr;
>> + pr_cont("AnyThread deprecated, ");
> Is there a reason the leading space is missing here? Other than that,
> LGTM.
It's removed intentionally. The leading space is unnecessary and seems to
be long-term typo.
Thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com>
>
>> + }
>>
>> intel_pmu_check_event_constraints_all(NULL);
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
>> b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
>> index eae24bb35dc1..5902a297daa1 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
>> @@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ union perf_capabilities {
>> u64 perf_metrics:1;
>> u64 pebs_output_pt_available:1;
>> u64 pebs_timing_info:1;
>> - u64 anythread_deprecated:1;
>> + u64 __reserved:1;
>> u64 rdpmc_metrics_clear:1;
>> };
>> u64 capabilities;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 1:11 [PATCH 0/8] perf/x86: Miscellaneous PMU bug fixes Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf/x86/intel: Remove anythread_deprecated bit from perf_capabilities Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 17:04 ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-06-08 1:37 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf/x86: Introduce is_x86_pmu() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 17:08 ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf/x86: Update cap_user_rdpmc base on rdpmc user disable state Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 17:15 ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf/x86/intel: Fix redundant branch type check in intel_pmu_lbr_filter() Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 18:28 ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-06-08 1:56 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-08 6:15 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf/x86/intel: Fix kernel address leakages in LBR stack Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 1:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 3:20 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf/x86/intel: Validate return value of intel_pmu_init_hybrid() Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 1:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 3:29 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-05 16:17 ` Chen, Zide
2026-06-08 2:48 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-05 18:47 ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf/x86/intel: Drop fixed-counter PEBS constraints for baseline PEBS Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 20:32 ` Chen, Zide
2026-06-08 2:46 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-05 1:11 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf/core: Fix kernel register info leak via hardware skid Dapeng Mi
2026-06-05 1:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 3:42 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-05 19:08 ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-06-08 2:47 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a2bdb92-11b5-46ab-83a4-9b58e71ca581@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox