From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: sashiko@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf test: fix sys_enter_openat event test for musl
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 15:32:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae_kClvu1mDBE218@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427094939.4FB8EC19425@smtp.kernel.org>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 09:49:37AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
> - [Medium] The updated bitwise check `(tp_flags & flags) != flags` fails to verify the `O_RDONLY` access mode and permits arbitrary unrelated flags, severely weakening the test.
> --
>
> commit 0700122c98ba7f263a329cd8f9fbeef95b67603e
> Author: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
>
> perf test: fix sys_enter_openat event test for musl
>
> This commit updates the sys_enter_openat test to allow additional flags in the
> captured event. It replaces the strict equality check with a bitwise mask check
> to accommodate the O_LARGEFILE flag implicitly added by musl libc.
>
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-tp-fields.c b/tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-tp-fields.c
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-tp-fields.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-tp-fields.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -120,7 +120,8 @@ static int test__syscall_openat_tp_fields(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused
> >
> > tp_flags = evsel__intval(evsel, &sample, "flags");
> > perf_sample__exit(&sample);
> > - if (flags != tp_flags) {
> > + /* C library wrapper may set additional flags */
> > + if ((tp_flags & flags) != flags) {
>
> Does this check still verify the O_RDONLY access mode?
>
> Since O_RDONLY is defined as 0, the flags variable evaluates to exactly
> O_DIRECTORY. This means the condition functionally becomes
> (tp_flags & O_DIRECTORY) != O_DIRECTORY.
>
> Does this unintentionally permit other access modes like O_WRONLY or O_RDWR,
> and ignore other unrelated flags as long as O_DIRECTORY is set?
I think it's ok for tp_flags to have more flags.
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> > pr_debug("%s: Expected flags=%#x, got %#x\n",
> > __func__, flags, tp_flags);
> > goto out_delete_evlist;
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260427090225.794482-1-martin@kaiser.cx?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 9:01 [PATCH 0/3] perf: fix some tests for musl Martin Kaiser
2026-04-27 9:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf test: fix nanosleep check in the ftrace test Martin Kaiser
2026-04-27 22:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-27 9:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf test: fix sys_enter_openat event test for musl Martin Kaiser
2026-04-27 9:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-27 22:32 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-04-27 9:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf test: fix "trace summary" test for musl-based systems Martin Kaiser
2026-04-27 9:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-27 22:37 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae_kClvu1mDBE218@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin@kaiser.cx \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox