From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: sashiko@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf test: fix "trace summary" test for musl-based systems
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 15:37:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae_lGcA28pUIfczJ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427095745.D6D11C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 09:57:44AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
> - [Medium] The `ps --help` test workload is brittle and will continue to fail on many musl-based systems that use BusyBox.
> --
>
> commit 41e18297314ee059526c7fb6d14d02d61ba92d64
> Author: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
>
> perf test: fix "trace summary" test for musl-based systems
>
> This commit updates the trace summary test to use ps --help instead
> of true. The goal is to ensure the test workload triggers open, read,
> and close events from dynamic library loading on musl-based systems.
>
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_summary.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_summary.sh
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_summary.sh
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_summary.sh
> > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ OUTPUT=$(mktemp /tmp/perf_trace_test.XXXXX)
> >
> > test_perf_trace() {
> > args=$1
> > - workload="true"
> > + workload="ps --help"
>
> Will this workload still fail on musl-based systems that use BusyBox?
>
> Many musl-based distributions, such as Alpine Linux or OpenWrt, frequently
> use BusyBox to provide standard utilities. BusyBox's ps is typically
> statically linked or links only to libc, without depending on libprocps.
>
> Furthermore, running ps --help in BusyBox generally prints the usage string
> and exits without performing file I/O, which means no open, read, or close
> events will be generated.
>
> Would a command that natively performs file I/O, such as cat /dev/null or
> dd if=/dev/null of=/dev/null, be more robust here?
Sounds right, it'd be nice if the workload doesn't print anything like
above.
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> > search="^\s*(open|read|close).*[0-9]+%$"
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260427090225.794482-1-martin@kaiser.cx?part=3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 9:01 [PATCH 0/3] perf: fix some tests for musl Martin Kaiser
2026-04-27 9:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf test: fix nanosleep check in the ftrace test Martin Kaiser
2026-04-27 22:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-27 9:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf test: fix sys_enter_openat event test for musl Martin Kaiser
2026-04-27 9:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-27 22:32 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-27 9:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf test: fix "trace summary" test for musl-based systems Martin Kaiser
2026-04-27 9:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-27 22:37 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae_lGcA28pUIfczJ@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin@kaiser.cx \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox