From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: olteanv@gmail.com, vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 04/11] spmi: Remove unneeded goto in spmi_device_add() error path
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:48:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707084824.6B80C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707083730.33977-5-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] If `ida_alloc()` fails in `spmi_controller_alloc()`, the error path incorrectly frees ID 0.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v10 04/11] spmi: Remove unneeded goto in spmi_device_add() error path ---
commit 46c20d4429e15ea3e907f6068ddedd7ed9c940f8
Author: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
spmi: Remove unneeded goto in spmi_device_add() error path
This commit simplifies the error handling in spmi_device_add() by removing an
unnecessary goto statement and returning directly on failure. It also explicitly
returns 0 on success to improve code readability.
> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
> index fa3323521f1a2..cae89dd915d4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
[ ... ]
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the spmi_controller_alloc() error path
incorrectly free ID 0 if ida_alloc() fails?
Looking at spmi_controller_alloc():
ctrl = kzalloc_flex(*ctrl, priv, size);
/* ctrl->nr is implicitly 0 */
/* ... */
id = ida_alloc(&ctrl_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
if (id < 0) {
dev_err(parent,
"unable to allocate SPMI controller identifier.\n");
spmi_controller_put(ctrl);
return ERR_PTR(id);
}
If ida_alloc() returns an error code, spmi_controller_put(ctrl) is called
while ctrl->nr is still 0. This drops the reference and triggers the release
function:
drivers/spmi/spmi.c:spmi_ctrl_release() {
struct spmi_controller *ctrl = to_spmi_controller(dev);
ida_free(&ctrl_ida, ctrl->nr);
kfree(ctrl);
}
Could this cause ida_free() to unconditionally free ID 0, potentially
corrupting the global IDA state if another SPMI controller is actively using
that identifier?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260707083730.33977-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com?part=4
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 8:37 [PATCH v10 00/11] SPMI: Implement sub-devices and migrate drivers AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 01/11] spmi: Fix potential use-after-free by grabbing of_node reference AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 9:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 02/11] spmi: Remove redundant dev_name() print in spmi_device_add() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 03/11] spmi: Print error status with %pe format AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 04/11] spmi: Remove unneeded goto in spmi_device_add() error path AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 05/11] spmi: Implement spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() and devm variant AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 06/11] nvmem: qcom-spmi-sdam: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 07/11] power: reset: qcom-pon: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 08/11] phy: qualcomm: eusb2-repeater: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 09/11] misc: qcom-coincell: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 10/11] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 9:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v10 11/11] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: Remove regmap R/W wrapper functions AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 8:55 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260707084824.6B80C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox